Sentences with phrase «simple no chance of»

There was simple no chance of getting him back.

Not exact matches

If you end up among the many who decide to begin a job search in 2018 in pursuit of your next big thing, here are two important but simple things you should make sure you do that will not only significantly increase your chances of finding a great new job but will also help you land one that you can feel good about long after the «new company halo effect» has worn off.
Here are a few simple financial moves he says can bolster your chances of success.
«Many successful people I know have a routine of starting their morning with a simple chuckle — whether it's from a «joke of the day» email they subscribe to or some tradition they've created to give themselves a chance to laugh each morning,» says Kerr.
But there's a simple way to increase your chances of being able to upgrade to first - class with miles, New York Times best - selling author Tilly Bagshawe told Bloomberg.
Families can participate by thinking up a fun invention idea, creating a simple drawing and short explanation of it and uploading both to MyDreamvention.com by April 24 for a chance to win.
Anyone looking to boost their chances of really connecting with a valuable new contact can give themselves a leg up but adopting this simple trick — before you walk into the meeting spend some time considering what you and your new connection have in common, no matter how different you might seem at first blush.
Maybe you just want a simple low - interest credit card that minimizes the chances of falling too far in debt.
But we can take some relatively simple steps to massively increase our chances of getting there before we're too old, sick, or tired to try.
Binary options trading is a high risk endeavor, and giving yourself every advantage you can is one of the simplest ways to improve your chances of being profitable.
To increase your chances of getting credit at an affordable rate, it pays to take steps to improve your business credit — and it's simpler than you might think.
One of the simple joys of the ReleBlog, the Music Blog Guest post, gives us the chance to take heed of some of our favorite artists» thoughts.
If humans were not designed by a higher authority, how can each individual's DNA be uniquely different among the human species, especially different than the other animals; how can the life sustaining elements be constantly available and exist in exact formulations: O, H, C etc. water is always 2 atoms of Hydrogen and one atom of Oxygen; sugar, fats, grains, and any bio-chemical products can be broken down to their simplest forms of elements, but can be re-constructed with specific (not by chance) formula.
If your scientists can't make the simplest form of life, and your neo-Darwinian evolution theory is seriously flawed, it would seem that your faith in blind chance should be much weaker than it is.
I am a well educated person, and happen to know that the principles of biochemistry totally militate against even a simple cell arising by blind chance.
If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by scientific training into the conviction that life originated spontaneously on the Earth, this simple calculation (of the 2,000 proteins coming about chance) wipes the idea entirely out of court.»
Dreams, for example, were given a high place as media of divine revelation; (Genesis 20:3; 26:24 - 25; 28:10 - 16; 31:24; 37:5; 41:1; 46:1 - 4; Judges 7:13 - 15; I Kings 3:5 - 15 etc.) omens were trusted, such as the first word to be uttered at an expected meeting, (I Samuel 14:8 - 15) or a chance action regarded as a sign, (Genesis 24:12 - 14) or wind in the mulberry - trees taken as Yahweh's command to join battle; (II Samuel 5:22 - 24) and, in general, dealing with the superhuman world suggested nothing so simple and spiritual as private communion in prayer, but rather a whole array of magical techniques and, from the modern point of view, incredible superstitions.
The point about all these pontifications, I thought at the time, whether over the airwaves or in the print media, either by secular commentators or by the kind of Catholics the liberal media like to give a platform to because their views on the Catholic tradition are so similar to their own (it seemed by the beginning of the conclave that it had all been going on for ever) was — or so I reflected then in my simple way — that this wonderful free - for - all was the only chance for many of them to be heard at all on this subject.
Some scientists have so struggled with the extreme improbability of the conditions for life resulting from randomness that they go so far as to dream up theories of parallel universes to explain the problems presented by simple math on the likelihood of random chance.
Unfortunately, they don't have the sense of autonomy that would lead them to refuse sex if their own life - chances (as well as those of their as - yet - unborn children) are in danger of being damaged by male reluctance to use the simple means of contraception readily available.
The question then is whether it actually makes more sense that something so complicated and intelligent really has a better chance than a simple, unintelligent universe of surviving infinite timelessness and being a «first cause»?
Even a simple protein molecule is so rich in information that the entire history of the universe since the Big Bang wouldn't give you the time you would need to generate that molecule by chance.
A cheap and readily available supply of simple modern contraceptives can allow parents who wish to make use of them to improve their own level of comfort, and may also (by facilitating the spacing of births) improve family health chances — even if their adoption has no ultimate effect on the size of the family.
When all allowance has been made for these limiting factors — the chances of oral transmission, the effect of translation, the interest of teachers in making the sayings «contemporary,» and simple human fallibility — it remains that the first three gospels offer a body of sayings on the whole so consistent, so coherent, and withal so distinctive in manner, style content, that no reasonable critic should doubt, whatever reservations he may have about individual sayings, that we find reflected here the thought of a single, unique teacher.
Modern attempts to offer a rational account of the relationship between mind (its rational unity) and nature (understood as the realm of finitude, chance, contingency, and decay) have fallen prey to a seemingly simple yet extremely stubborn dualistic dilemma.
For a summary of some of the scientific research which supports the view that the fetus is not a prepackaged human being (e.g., even something so relatively simple as a fingerprint arises at least in part due to chance events not present in a fertilized egg) see Charles Gardner, «Is an Embryo a Person?
Since Darwin, this process of evolutionary growth, whereby levels of Increasing complexity are seen to emerge from simpler ones, has been explained in terms of the double mechanism of natural selection and chance variation.
He goes on to comment: «if we wish to explain the observed world in terms of Matter without reference to Mind, then it must be explained by things material, ultimate and simple all at the same time — by indivisible, notional «atoms» and a chance «swerve» that sets them in random motion.
I am more of a realist — it is highly unlikely that the universe with all its irreducible complexity and ultra precise design, not to mention our ever increasing plunge towards entropy, came to being by simple chance.
If you grew up in church, there's a good chance you were taught a pretty simple message about the afterlife: When you die, you either go to heaven, or you go to hell — both of which will last forever and never change.
He should have seen that this was not just the result of chance or of simple political calculation.
Take a real good look at the simplest of life forms and tell me that happened by random chance!
The increasing number of scientific discoveries involving hyper - complex systems, even among the smallest of life forms, point away from the idea of these systems forming by simple «chance» and more toward an intelligent creator.
Scroll to the bottom of this post for your chance to win One Simple Change.
There was no breading, just sprouts and oil, which seemed almost too simple, but of course I had to try it at home as soon as I got the chance.
This simple quinoa pilaf is a nice chance of pace when you want something different from the usual rice pilaf.
Of course I don't always go all out and have some simple and less colourful foods, but whenever given the chance I will fill my plate with as many colours as possible.
And for all of you who haven't tried cassava yet, this recipe is simple enough to give it a chance.
By signing up for the challenge (which is completely free) you'll get a new coupon each week, simple tips on how to make dairy - free swaps, a dairy - free shopping list and a chance to win a years supply of So Delicious Dairy - Free products.
Having babies gave their family a desire to return to the old paths — to nourish their family with traditional, homegrown foods; rid their home of toxic chemicals and petroleum products; and give their boys a chance to know a simple, sustainable way of life.
Heart - shaped cookies are essential for Valentine's Day — but instead of buying processed cookies, now is the chance to make easy heart cookies using just simple, natural ingredients.
We have enough clock - in clock - out and same - old - same - old in our daily lives to not take the chance to experience something new and exciting, even if it is something as simple as buying a mystery bottle of wine.
Whether it got you through some lean times or was a simple meal gathering family around the table, the first bite will always remind you of the past, giving you a chance to relive it again and again.
So we blame him when welbeck fails to score two simple tap ins after bn fed on a plate... Or when Sanchez forgets he is a wing forward not an central midfielder or when walcoot fails to score when ozil has just offered him the easiest of chances.
Nothing you could ever do to Giroud would ever make him come good just nothing.Its not a formation set up that gets a player to dribble, score, be world class, be dependable, wow the crowd and the like.Its the players» own ability that makes him do that.Once you don't have it ya ain't gat it brother.Read my lips!!!!! Once ya don't have it ya ain't gat it.As simple as ABC.So I expect this to be another de ja vu case and waste of time if Giroud and Alexis are paired.I'm even shocked it's coming from Henry.He should rather be giving us more reasons why we need a new striker and why we would fail if we don't get the new striker.Forget Giroud's stats for a moment and judge him by how he plays when you are watching him.You would realize that given the same chances at Arsenal strikers who are not even world class can do better.I want a new striker even if not world class and to be honest its not necessarily a world class striker that wins you a league but just increases the chances of winning it.Peace!!!!
If we as Arsenal fans and especially Arsene Wenger believe in how we as a club should play the game then we should have nothing to do with this man and his support of what effectively is the simple murder of animals who have no chance of defending themselves.
Giroud's presence affords him the chance to be involved more in games creating and scoring some himself as it was seen with the rapid breakout in attack where Giroud feed Sanchez in the box for a simple tap in to make it 3 - 1 with the Chile forward racing to Giroud to celebrate as they were spotted in some kind of brotherhood celebration in tandem with the Chief distributor Mesut Ozil.
the only thing our strikers (whoever it will be) need to do is to convert created chances which we had plenty last season and we are going to have them this season too... So, I'll put it simple: we need a striker that doesn't s ** t his pants when he get in front of the goal and hit the g ** d ** n target and score goals!!!!!!!!
There's a simple reason why Tom Kite, 55 and a Hall of Famer, traded the sure - thing senior circuit for a long - shot return to the PGA Tour: He might not get another chance
The solution is simple give yourself a chance of not loosing the game against MU
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z