One
simple phrase though pushes all that happiness, all that relaxation back into oblivion.
Not exact matches
Astonishingly enough, the
simple phrase «none greater» involves two major equivocations, not indeed as Anselm used the
phrase, but as it might reasonably be used, even
though the possibility of such usage seems not to have been clearly seen by Anselm or anyone else.
But the
phrase «
simple lifestyle choices» is not a headline - maker... so a common sense approach to this subject is not always easy to find,
though it is very real!
In Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Sandwell BC, reported with the conjoined case of Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC at [1994] 4 All ER 890, Hobhouse J reasoned that (seemingly on balance) he would follow the «weak» «expression of an opinion» in re Diplock at p 514 that the
phrase in s 2 (1)(a) of the 1939 Act, now s 5 of the 1980 Act, «actions founded on
simple contract» «must be taken to cover actions for money had and received... [t] he assumption must, we think, be made
though the words used can not be regarded as felicitous», the alternative being no time - bar at all.
I've tried a few tricks to make it feel bigger
though: light and airy cabinets on some of the walls and leaving others empty,
simple sleek cabinets without lots of handle / drawer details, built - in appliances to reduce visual clutter (such a pretenious design blog
phrase sorry but I can't think of a different one).