Not exact matches
It
really comes down to
simple physics: a smaller mass allows you to adapt, change directions and surmount unforeseen obstacles (three things that you often need to do during the business's infancy).
Despite the physicist's fondness for the phrase, the «two - body problem» is
really pretty
simple, in
physics and in life.
The strength of classical
physics was that calculations were
simple and could be used to model
really large molecules.
If you are anything like me and never
really understood
Physics in school, I will make it as
simple as possible here.
Our son was born there and Liam's dad is from Barnsley so I was
really pleased Liam chose to buy my ring there as I love sentimental things like this.Liam has a
simple cobalt band, he is a
physics teacher so he has to wear something hard wearing as he's always coming home having burnt his tie or some such accident so his ring is bound to be in danger at some point!
Its crazy
physics,
simple controls, stylish look, and cleverly - designed levels are all big reasons why we
really dug Badland in our review from back in April.
I do not
really think MS is ahead of this game, wonder how Frostbite 3 does it... (BF4, PvZ GW, NFS Rivals,...) Possibly
simpler to move off
physics calculations to the server - you shoot at something, it breaks, all players (within view) gets updated.
I can't
really put my finger on it for sure as to why but I will hazard a guess it is due to a
simpler physics.
If that is not happening, then everything I am saying is complete BS:) If it is happening, then you might just want to dust off your old thermodynamics books, blow off GHG theory and look at what
really controls our climate,
simple physics..
It's
really very well understood
physics with ample direct empirical confirmation, and actually one of the
simplest and best solved problems in climate.
I think the reason «atmospheric scientists», I'm putting this in quotation marks because I think this refers to «climate scientists» whose basic
physics I dispute, are resisting this is
really quite
simple, it includes condensation and as I've gone to some effort to explain, the Water Cycle is missing from the energy budgets and I give the following as examples of their narrative:
Really, I had no idea so many people around here actually disputed the basic mechanism itself, given that it's based on pretty
simple physics.
Tom Murphy from «Do The Math» blog has a great little video titled «Growth Has An Expiration Date» the math and the basic
physics behind it are
really simple, it doesn't take a PhD in advanced mathematics or
physics to understand it.