It's based on
simple principles too.
Not exact matches
Stop beating yourself up for the drastic changes you can't make, and stop settling for living without the
simple upgrades you can (that's a happiness
principle that's validated by research
too).
You are making it needlessly hard, or are perhaps just plain
too stupid to understand such a
simple fact as: there's no point debunking myths that virtually no one and no one at all with any real clout believes in anyway, but MUCH point in debunking myths that large numbers of people, including powerful politicians, believe should be the guiding
principles for the country's entire political culture and laws.
But I
too long for a world «in which modernity would have its full place» and in «the technological deployment of virtual realities» is possible without denying the truth of the «elementary
principles» and «the
simplest words» that correspond to who we really are.
Some chemistry kits are
too simple to be of much value but if you research what is available locally, you may find one with a good guide that leads your children through discovery about acids and alkalis, chemical structure and other
principles.
I'm really not
too sure how much food combining
principles applies here with dextrose (
simple carbs) and protein supplements.
Rather than teach
simple fundamentals and
principles that never change (because they're
too boring and un-marketable), the diet industry is driven by perpetually promoting the next big thing, spinning a story around around it, and all
too often, making it complicated.
You may remember learning about compound interest in math class, but the
principle is
simple: the returns that you earn on money can be compounded, and then they start to earn returns
too.
I
too have seen the arguments and critics of Dave Ramsey's plan but it boils down to the KISS
principle (keep it
simple stupid).
It is caused by at least three other factors: (i) almost every problem law students encounter in law school comes labelled either by the course or by the assigned moot topic; few students ever have to deal with a
simple cry for help from a client; (ii) in my experience at law schools — and it may be different now — almost all research was done in the context of litigation or moots and, while that's obviously an important focus, it's not the only one; and, perhaps the most important factor, (iii) the lawyers who give the students work far
too often ask the student to «find a case» — this is almost universal focus of litigators — and are uninterested in either context or
principle.
It sounds
too good to be true, but the
principle at work in a reverse mortgage is actually relatively
simple.