Sentences with phrase «simple questions as»

We are happy to help with simple questions as needed.

Our relationship questionnaire is the first stop and with this we will ask some simple questions as well as soon «interesting» ones to get you thinking.

She's likely asking questions in an attempt to keep a conversation going and loves to answer simple questions as well.

Your toddler's likely asking questions in an attempt to keep a conversation going and loves to answer simple questions as well.

That's not as simple a question as we might think.

So we asked ourselves a very simple question as a teacher / game - design team: «Why can't our classes be fun and compelling like a learning game every single school day all year long?»

Whether or not mortgage interest will have an impact on your tax bill is not as simple a question as you might think, or as it should be.

Answer: Not a simple question as every tumor is different.

You were kind enough to provide a link to old stations for me when I asked the simple question as to what stations had been used in the BEST reconstruction to 1750, as I wanted to try and see if the data used was original or had been «adjusted.»

Not exact matches

You can ask it a simple conversion question such as, «Alexa, how many cups are in a quart?»

The front end's as light as a feather and just as simple - you answer a few questions and you're good to go.

As one of our key employees, I want to informally pose some simple questions that can help me to understand the factors that cause you to enjoy and stay in your current role,» writes Sullivan.

If you work in an industry where you share the same suppliers as your competitors, it could pay to ask them some simple questions.

In economics, as in life, the simplest questions are often the most difficult to answer.

Your survey can be as simple as a postcard or as elaborate as a cover letter, questionnaire and reply envelope Keep questionnaires to a maximum of one page, and ask no more than 20 questions.

As Hemingway wrote in the Sun Also Rises, there's a very simple answer to the question, «How did you go bankrupt?»

That simple question is often lost among the many controversies facing the ride - services company as it tries to hire a new chief executive and resolve a bitter dispute with the old one, Travis Kalanick.

As a recent meeting of some of Canada and Asia's most influential business leaders revealed, the simple question has a not - so - simple answer.

For Graseck, the key question is: «Will the benefits exceed the costs and risks of implementation, particularly relative to simpler alternatives, such as updating legacy infrastructure?»

Information consumption could be as simple as reading a comment in a forum, asking a question online, or listening to a case study at a live event.

As simple as the question sounds, it is still the hardest question for businesses to answeAs simple as the question sounds, it is still the hardest question for businesses to answeas the question sounds, it is still the hardest question for businesses to answer.

As you know, we ask our customers this simple question regularly upon receipt of their Fab order: How likely are you to recommend Fab to your friends?

SEO ramifications were not entirely flushed out, even as moderator Danny Sullivan and the eager audience asked penetrating questions to delve deeper, but just consider a simple brand preference scenario.

If any of the questions above catches your interest; then read on as I share with you 10 simple but powerful customer retention strategies that will keep your customers happy and loyal.

Had Ron and Shamir done even rudimentary research into the identities of said addresses, such as a search on the Bitcoin - OTC site, Bitcoin Talk forums, or even via a simple Google search, they could have easily found that the original very early source address in question (12higD) is, very publicly, one of mine and not one of Satoshi's as they insinuate in their paper.

Good questions, but I don't think there are simple clear answers as the book describes different metrics for measuring the different stages.

The problem is simple: Central bankers don't know the answer to either question and as a result are unprepared for the consequences, or even to recognize them while they are occurring.

Alliance Virtual Offices uses a live chat facility, as does Clarendon Business Centres — which they say handles everything from simple questions to meeting room bookings.

There is, actually, as simple, obvious answer to your question.

I offer a few simple questions: — How can we possibly believe the words written in a book 2000 years ago; or 200 hundred years ago; should be taken with so absolute faith as to be blind to the inconsistencies.

The Cult is related to the phenomenon described as «scientism»; both have a tendency to treat the body of scientific knowledge as a holy book or an a-religious revelation that offers simple and decisive resolutions to deep questions.

Not all Jews believe this, BTW, but in Judaism I have yet to run across someone who believe that G - d would punish anyone for their «beliefs» and not their «deeds» (take a good look at the Tanach... the contract with the Jews (known as the «teachings of G - d», not «the law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to view «the teachings of G - d» (the law) as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the simple question..

However this discussion develops, the way to get the moral questions into clear focus begins with a careful reading of John Coons» «School Choice as Simple Justice.»

If you are a member of the faith, read 1 Cor 14:33, and question whether God would have his words recorded in such a confusing, disorderly manner, or if, as we are reminded through Occam's razor, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.

In response to your question as to what my reasons were I have a very simple answer.

Questioning and tossing out old, obsolete ideas is what led to desegregation, women's right to vote, gay marriage (albeit as slow as molasses), and even many simple everyday things.

The simple act of raising questions about these doctrines will probably cause some to brand me as a heretic.

«So, returning to the question as to why I am single, there is no simple, easy answer; but I do believe that, in part, it is because I am a woman and a leader and didn't marry before it became apparent that I was not a behind - the - scenes leader but an up - front, out - loud, follow - me one.»

However we approach the question, it remains true as a matter of simple history that Christianity in its development represents what we might describe as the marriage of Jewish realism and of cultural forms which are not Jewish at all.

The question is not as simple as the religious right.

Why won't you answer the simple question of what definition of religion you are using that could possibly put NOT believing as a religion?

What you are describing sounds like a simple word flip by someone being inundated with questions about what religion he practices and if he is, or ever was a Muslim, NOT the President saying he is a Muslim as you and SugarKube are insinuating.

I don't really expect you to answer these questions, I'm just trying to show that it's not as simple as you imply.

This question is just as simple, and just as difficult, as yours.

It's a simple issue of categorization — it's a question of FACT: Can the Pope's policy administrations be categorized as Marxist or not?

This explains why a man who is acknowledged as brilliant stammers like a high school student who didn't read last night's homework assignment, no matter how simple the question.

The simple fact that these feelings exist demonstrates that the idea of love can not be dismissed as irrelevant to the abortion question.

1) We're highly evolved primates 2) We have overactive imaginations 3) Our greatest evolutionary asset, our large and highly-folded brains, are also responsible for an insatiable curiosity 4) As a species, and a survival tactic, we make things up to comfort ourselves in difficult times 5) As a complex societal species, we create commonalities and «traditions» with others in our clan / tribe / community 6) These «traditions» result in security, trust, and strong relationships that make the collective more able to survive than the individual 7) These common beliefs also act as a means of numbing the brain to questions and concerns without legitimate or tangible answers 8) Religion is simply a survival mechanism 9) When we die, we simple «are not alive» anymorAs a species, and a survival tactic, we make things up to comfort ourselves in difficult times 5) As a complex societal species, we create commonalities and «traditions» with others in our clan / tribe / community 6) These «traditions» result in security, trust, and strong relationships that make the collective more able to survive than the individual 7) These common beliefs also act as a means of numbing the brain to questions and concerns without legitimate or tangible answers 8) Religion is simply a survival mechanism 9) When we die, we simple «are not alive» anymorAs a complex societal species, we create commonalities and «traditions» with others in our clan / tribe / community 6) These «traditions» result in security, trust, and strong relationships that make the collective more able to survive than the individual 7) These common beliefs also act as a means of numbing the brain to questions and concerns without legitimate or tangible answers 8) Religion is simply a survival mechanism 9) When we die, we simple «are not alive» anymoras a means of numbing the brain to questions and concerns without legitimate or tangible answers 8) Religion is simply a survival mechanism 9) When we die, we simple «are not alive» anymore.

I have also found myself looking into the faces of that diversified company of informal students embracing, for example, my colleagues teaching in other fields, as well as those other friends from all walks with whom I spend sustaining nonworking hours and who, ever and again even in the midst of play, put me back to work with «simple» innocent questions about the Bible.

In any event, in a closely parallel discussion of the very same question, of how problematic terms like «know» or «love» as applied to God are to be classified, he in no way appeals to psychicalism, but argues instead that, although they are «in such application not literal in the simple sense in which «relative» can be,» they nevertheless «may be literal if or in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155).