Not exact matches
Gavin told me years ago at RC that whenever Triana was in place, we'd still need a corresponding instrument on the night side to get a
simple answer to the
radiation balance question.
It comes down to
simple physics, the fact that greenhouse gases absorb outgoing long wave
radiation and that according to the Stephan Boltzmann equation the change in temperature is proportional to the
radiation balance.
That claim is too
simple to be useful, ignoring a) the complex interaction of Boltzmann
radiation with the surface, the clouds, the GHGs, and the like, and b) the various regimes in the tropics, each of which modifies and changes the overall energy
balance by things like convection and latent heat transfer.
Now Chilingar and his colleagues bring out the
simple equation
balancing the effective
radiation temperature of the earth with the solar
radiation absorbed.
-- only energy
balance matters (here comes the school of people saying that the system is trivially
simple because it exchanges energy only by
radiation)-- only «equilibrium» matters (here comes the school of people who compare the system to a small ball slightly moved away from its equilibrium position inside a spherical bowl)-- space doesn't matter (this is a tautology because if a 3D system can be reduced to 1D and still predicted, then the «neglected» 2 D obviously didn't matter)-- from the above follows also necessarily that everything that happens in the real 3D world can only be noise (here comes the school of people who say that everything averages out)
Axel Kleidon and Maik Renner of the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena, Germany, used a
simple energy
balance model to determine how sensitive the water cycle is to an increase in surface temperature due to a stronger greenhouse effect and to an increase in solar
radiation.
They combined
simple energy
balance considerations with a physical assumption for the way water vapour is transported, and separated the contributions of surface heating from solar
radiation and from increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to obtain the two sensitivities.
Re-reading the very informative 2009 Ramanathan and Feng article I came across this relatively
simple explanation of the earth's
radiation balance: