Sentences with phrase «simple rules do»

These few simple rules don't just protect a landlord from potential conflict, they help attract the good tenants to your property.

Granted, simple rules do not always lead to optimal decisions.

But when we take into consideration the different types of training, goals and diets of different athletes, that simple rule doesn't apply so neatly for every case.

Become a Better Writer by Following This One Simple Rule Do you want to be a better writer?

Not exact matches

Here's a simple rule of thumb for when to keep your own mouth shut: don't say a thing unless it's going to help someone else in the meeting do their job better.

I wrote a separate article on the topic of delegation where the simple rule is that if someone can do a job 70 % as good as you can, you should delegate it because you get 70 % of the output using almost none of your time.

Exploding expectations doesn't come from following the conventional wisdom, so it's no shock that Prince ascribed his company's success to these eight simple but utterly counter-intuitive rules:

Having done more deals in more businesses than I can count, I've got a few simple rules that have saved me tons of money, helped me dodge more than a few bullets, and added a few years to my life.

Almost everyone can name a simple rule — one of the most famous is Warren Buffett's mantra that he won't invest in anything he doesn't understand — but such rules can be difficult to uncover and learn, even though, in retrospect, they can seem blindingly obvious.

But how, exactly, do you discover simple rules, and how can you know they'll work for your business?

The most useful mental models and rules of thumb, in other words, are often dead simple, which is why an interview Adam Bryant of The New York Times did with Dropbox co-founder and CEO Drew Houston earlier this year is so helpful (hat tip to Business Insider for the pointer).

Then follow these simple rules: Don't use your personal credit card for business purchases unless you file an expense report, and go through proper channels to get reimbursed.

The rules get more complex from there, but the theme is simple: Don't fake it.

Don't waste time, don't procrastinate, focus on your sales mission — all simple rules to ensure you achieve your goals... but so often overlooked.

Employees do better when the rules, policies and procedures are short and simple.

As you consider building your own minimum viable product, let this simple rule suffice — remove any feature, process or effort that does not contribute directly to the learning you seek.»

Do whatever it takes to get your head above water, whether it's adopting a no - spending rule for a week or even a month or something as simple as dedicating yourself to packing a lunch each day.

Evans rings off some simple rules: don't buy anything you're pressured to buy or don't understand; ask the seller for their qualifications and track record, and if they don't give satisfactory answers, don't buy; don't invest more money than you can stand to lose, and never invest it all in one deal; avoid anything with an offshore element to it («That means your money's never coming back»); and seek out an unbiased second opinion, say, from your accountant or bank manager.

Dividends made sense 40 years ago as a relatively simple rule of thumb, but after all the work done by John Bogle with index investing, and academics with Monte Carlo sims and the 4 % rule, dividend investing just isn't the simplest, cleanest way to invest or receive passive income anymore.

China's plan involves very different strings than the postwar American checks did: no interest in promoting the rule of law, free markets, and (US - led) global standards, but a rather simple «buy from Chinese state owned corporations, accept Chinese currency, employ Chinese standards.»

We love sharing objective walk - throughs of past stock trades because doing so reinforces the rules of our simple trading system.

The now - endangered fiduciary rule is based on a simple — and seemingly unarguable — principle: that in giving advice to clients with retirement funds, stockbrokers, registered investment advisers and insurance agents must act in the best interests of their clients... It simply doesn't seem like a good business practice for Wall Street to tell its client - investors, «We put your interests second, after our firm's, but it's close.»

This rule is simple Do Not OVERTRADE EVER for this is an easy way to lose all your capital quickly.

But do simple rules of thumb such as this, which are particularly alluring to fall back on during political and policy uncertainty, really work?

It doesn't help that 10 - year bond yields are still lower than the prospective operating earnings yield on the S&P 500 (the «Fed Model»), not only because the model is built on an omitted variables bias (see the August 22 2005 comment), but also because the model statistically underperforms a simpler rule that says «get in when stock yields are high and interest rates are falling, and get out when the reverse is true.»

Discover does let you ask for a credit limit increase and in most cases it will result in a soft pull, as long as you follow some simple rules.

Does adding a position stop - loss rule improve the performance of the «Simple Asset Class ETF Momentum Strategy» (SACEMS) by avoiding some downside volatility?

He is one of the co-authors of «The 3 Simple Rules of Investing: Why Everything You've Heard about Investing Is Wrong — and What to Do Instead» and author of «The Big Investment Lie.»

All these rules and regulations would not be needed if only simple investing was done.

Does adding a position take - profit (stop - gain) rule improve the performance of the «Simple Asset Class ETF Momentum Strategy» (SACEMS) by harvesting some upside volatility?

So personally, I think they got exactly what they deserved for opening their mouths and complaining over 4 busses having a simple basic add that is not offensive at all except to those who believe they have the right to DICTATE (derived from Dictator) to others what they can and can not do and who SCREAM bloody murder if they are subject to the same rules they themselves wish to espouse.

It is simple when you die... you go to this other side and this other side has rules BAD you do to a place called HELL, Good you go to where HE went after he was crucified and then resurrected.

Recognizing the flaws, follies and frauds in the foundations of Islam, Judaism and Christianity, the «bowers», kneelers» and «pew peasants» are converging these religions into some simple rules of life (e.g. Do No Harm).

I'd rather follow the simple rules of the commandments and have a good life then realize later that I didn't need to, as opposed to not following them and spending the rest of eternity in Hell.

If a basic rule of hermeneutics is that the simpler and clearer texts should override the more difficult and troubling texts, and if Jesus Christ is the image of the invisible God so that He can say «if you have seen Me, you have seen the Father,» why do we choose to let the more troubling, difficult, and violent texts override and trump the loving, merciful, and Christlike texts?

I come to wonder, if what we read out of scripture needs a proper interpretation of it following some basic principals to be in the proper context and we don't follow those simple rules, then what we interpret creates in our minds a false will of God and we follow this so called «Gods will» are we going down the wrong path?

Another pejorative term is «reductionistic» — again, said by people that do not understand the complex beauty of systems defined by a minimal of simple rules.

How do you not get this simple, obvious rule of logic?

As long as you follow this simple rule, you will live forever and whatever you do, think or believe doesn't really matter.»

Recognizing the flaws, follies and frauds in the foundations of Islam, Judaism and Christianity, the «bowers», kneelers» and «pew peasants» are converging these religions into some simple rules of life e.g. Do No Harm.

If you refuse to follow the rules which are pretty dang simple you do nt get to play in the Lords house you go somewhere else.

Recognizing the flaws, follies and frauds in the foundations of Islam, Judaism and Christianity by the «bowers», kneelers» and «pew peasants» will quickly converge these religions into some simple rules of life e.g. Do No Harm.

Recognizing the flaws, follies and frauds in the foundations of Islam, Judaism and Christianity by the «bowers», kneelers» and «pew peasants» will converge these religions into some simple rules of life, e.g. DO NO HARM.

I live by a simple rule, a slightly modified «Golden Rule»: «Do onto others as you would have done to everyone.&rarule, a slightly modified «Golden Rule»: «Do onto others as you would have done to everyone.&raRule»: «Do onto others as you would have done to everyone.»

Neville there were times when dominionism worked for Israel which were the exceptions rather than the rule but generally it did nt sadly because of the wickedness of peoples hearts.Power tends to corrupt people ie in the case of nebbucanezzar especially when they succeed.Like you i think Gods people have more impact by just letting Christ work through them could be me but i find politics tends to involve power money and compromise.Regardless of what political state we find ourselves Gods sovereign and his will be done on earth as it is in heaven.My focus is real simple just follow Jesus with all my heart mind soul and strength and love others as myself and that is just following Jesus daily and trusting him in everything.regards brentnz

Do you see the benefits of following a simple rule?

In a world where Reichian quackery rules, we do not debate the limits of modesty for the simple reason that the very concept of modesty itself is illegitimate, a fundamentally oppressive notion.

Jesus had simple rules love God and your neighbor, do no harm.

Recognizing the flaws, follies and frauds in the foundations of Islam, Judaism, Baha'ism, Christianity et al, the «bowers», kneelers» and «pew peasants» are converging these religions into some simple rules of life (e.g. «Do no Harm»).

Do you mean to say that simple rules like «Don't steal — coz you won't like it if it happens to you», «Don't kill — coz you won't like it if it happens to you», can only be followed if there is fear of religion and repercussions after death?