so it's not as
simplistic as the conclusion of this article suggests.
Not exact matches
what investigations have you done that have lead you to this
conclusion (I «m sure it isnt something
as simplistic as «you just know none of the bible is true») 2.
Regrettably, the rushed
conclusion seems not merely abrupt, but, because the movie was in the process of weaving a relatively sophisticated tapestry of loss,
simplistic and asinine
as well.
Consequently, it would be
simplistic and misleading to draw firm
conclusions and make a singular assessment of academies
as a whole.
I know people are impatient and good at leaping to
conclusions using
simplistic black or white views of the world but I think the responses to this original paper, such
as Gavin's post above, are part of the process.
I drew the very
simplistic conclusion a) that GCMs can not really determine ECS, and b) that an ECS value of 1.3 C hindcasts
as well
as any other value.
Although defenders of charcoal tout its claim to be «carbon neutral,»
as much of the material used to create it comes from trees which can be replanted, we know this to be an overly
simplistic conclusion to a complex set of options and considerations.
Indeed,
simplistic hand waving dismissal of something
as being «negligible» is usually a good way to get to one's preconceived
conclusion.