That's a really
simplistic model of the climate in equilibrium.
Not exact matches
Bill, your view on the validation and applicability
of regional
climate modelling over Greenland is a bit too
simplistic.
The
model simulates most
of the main physical processes in the
climate system in a very
simplistic way and therefore allows very fast and simple
climate model simulations on a normal PC computer.
My impression from outside is that the statistical analyses are weak, the
climate models are
simplistic and overinfluenced by selection and publication biases, the theoretic underpinning is extraordinarily shakey and the belief engine is overrevved with the popularity
of certain «star performers» and the Romantic desire for a Paradise Lost that never existed.
Critics
of the
models had suggested that this indicated the
models were still too
simplistic for accurately describing the current
climate, let alone being used for predicting future
climate trends.
The bases for his claims relied on 3
simplistic assumptions that a) bleaching is evidence that coral have reached their limit
of maximum thermal tolerance, b) bleaching will increase due to global warming, and c) coral can not adapt quickly enough to temperatures projected by
climate models.
In fact that was what I initially thought
climate models were, only when I started doing a lot
of reading did I discover how
simplistic they were.
In 2007, for my first
climate video, I created an admittedly
simplistic model of global temperatures.
Further, as Reason Foundation Vice President Julian Morris «finds the administration's estimates
of the social cost
of carbon are «biased upwards» due to their reliance on three «
simplistic models, all
of which use estimates
of climate sensitivity that are likely too high and two
of which likely overestimate the economic impact
of climate change.»