Sentences with phrase «simply believing in the resurrection»

Some have tried, but the explanations get more outlandish and illogical than simply believing in the resurrection of Jesus.

Not exact matches

As a historian, Marxsen rejects the physical resurrection not because he does not believe in miracles, but because the earliest tradition simply doesn't identify resurrection with a resuscitated body.

Among evangelicals, so much emphasis has been placed on the doctrine of substiutionary atonement that the focus has shifted away from FOLLOWING the life and teachings of Jesus (in order to be saved from sin) to simply BELIEVING in the death and resurrection of Jesus (in order to be saved from judgment).

Anyone who believes in the resurrection when there is no other place in recorded history of such a thing happening is simply not worthy of debating with.

If a person must believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus, do they have to believe that it was by the shedding of blood of Jesus on the cross that sins are forgiven, or can they just believe that it was simply His death that was sufficient?

If one were trying to be objective, one could simply write the factual statement, «Christians believe that Christ's Resurrection took place in Jerusalem,» and leave it at that.

So when I say, I experience revelation, or simply, I believe in the resurrection, talking about sin does not nullify my belief.