Sentences with phrase «simply dishonest»

This is simply a dishonest statement.

It is simply dishonest and untrue to state that «thousands of Buyers deposits are sent to RECO each year».

I'd be very interested to know what your opinion is of scientists being what is, in my opinion, simply dishonest.

They are simply dishonest.

When a fellow denialist tells you you've misrepresented him, and you don't even bother to reply, let alone correct your error, what becomes crystal clear is that you're simply dishonest.

But to pretend he was not out in the public arena, taking full advantage of the publicity he got from being the Mann with the Mann Hockey Stick, riding the «stick portion of the coat - tails, as it were, is simply dishonest.

One can discuss the real difference between the gas age and ice age, but there is no doubt that there is a difference, thus alluding to some dirty trick or «arbitrary» shift of data, as Jaworowski says is simply dishonest.

Because it is simply dishonest.

Anything short of that is simply dishonest.

Although it could be said that a film like this challenges audience preconceptions and encourages discussion and debate, this will be greatly diminished by the dramatic and rather - too - fantastic denouement that allows the characters an easy escape that is simply dishonest and unhelpful.

This is a horrible thing to see out there as it is simply dishonest, but make no mistake: this is part of the online dating service industry.

Changing the tune the minute you get what you want is simply dishonest.

The notion that euthanasia is always «freely chosen» is simply dishonest.

The proposal describes this as some sort of discounted rate for small business owners, but that is simply dishonest.

Not exact matches

However, since there are also dishonest people in the world, a lot of these systems turn out to be cons, designed to simply take your money and run.

Neither early Christian nor modern scholar (nor modern publisher) will necessarily be actively dishonest, but simply bending to the pressures their world presents them and reading the evidence through the biases their situation provides them.

Noahs Ark has been proven false; virgin birth has been proven false; the creation story; the age of the earth... oh so many things and for you to deny the ACTUAL evidence is simply you being a narrow - minded, intellectually dishonest person.

I do not think that people are inherently dishonest, I simply know the mind plays many tricks, and people will often draw conclusions that are false, and then build on those false conclusions to create all new false conclusions.

I simply think it's dishonest of Christians to claim they «know» a god exists when they don't.

Simply asking for forgiveness for something one intends to do again seems dishonest.

To do that would be almost dishonest with New Yorkers because we simply, in this recession, don't have the resources to meet every need,» she said.

Real Salt vs. Himalayan and Celtic We're not trying to throw other companies under the bus and we don't believe they're trying to be dishonest; they simply might not know how to read their own analyses or we may have different approaches to interpreting them for the purposes of marketing.

We know that when it comes to «natural treatments» for hair loss, there are a lot dishonest people selling products that simply don't work.

This is the same dishonest gesture offered by standard Miramax period «art - movie» fluff such as Shakespeare in Love, an attempt to flatter us that we're somehow getting something serious and educational, not simply consumerist and sensational.

Put simply, Pondiscio and company are being ahistorical and intellectually dishonest to boot.

Clover neither sensationalizes nor heckles, he simply lays out the facts, and is merciless at pointing the finger at the guilty parties - from the trawlers with vast nets that destroy everything in their paths, to incompetent and / or dishonest scientists; to celebrity chefs who proudly display the «marine equivalent of panda, rhino and great apes» on their menus; to sports fisherman (23 % of endangered species caught in North American waters are caught by sports fisherman) and to the general public for whom eating fish has become «a kind of dietary talisman».

It is those whose claim to be self - publishers is simply a ruse to attract the unwary author and to mask their dishonest intentions who make it necessary to police the way all vanity publishers refer to themselves.

now taking place and Chase instead simply going for higher minimum payments (where it may have a stronger right to do so), this is like deja vu to me and the story is really the same to me... my advice remains the same as it was before: don't call Chase's operators complaining about the change, and don't accept any calls from them either, as some found that Chase operators can be outright dishonest and may make changes to your account saying you agreed to them orally on the call even though you clearly did not accept.

It's simply not true, and it's intellectually dishonest.

It seems dishonest to simply point out the sensational potential negative consequences to promote hysteria on the subject and to try to encourage political action.

On the whole, big fossil is indeed to blame, with their wholly self - referential and dishonest promotion of an alternate universe that they must know is simply not true.

Regardless, it is dishonest for the media to portray the Paris agreement as a binding treaty for the U.S. because that's simply not the case.

Pielke Sr's and others claims that Trenberth, Abraham and / or Gleick have committed any «personal attack» against Spencer, et al are simply frivolous and dishonest.

When SteveM makes his clearly stated, several times, argument that Parker was disputing the existence of UHIs (what else is SteveM saying, when he argues taht Parker's paper does nt disprove the existence of UHIs) he was simply being dishonest.

They were perfectly legitimate questions giving you a chance to explain this issue from your side rather than letting folks like myself simply take O'Donnell at his word that you acted in an unprofessional and potentially dishonest manner.

Although even there I am somewhat troubled by the phrase «the lawyer considers to be dishonest;» I would have thought in the context of advocacy a lawyer ought to have some objective basis for knowing that the client is being dishonest, rather than simply making a subjective assessment about whether she «considers» her client to be dishonest.

No one wants to hire a dishonest employee, and the truth will simply be exposed after the background check.