I would
simply dismiss it out of hand.
Frankly I think historians of this social mania are going to wonder why Trenberth was not
simply dismissed out of hand by all serious people after what he did.
Trolls / true beleivers
simply dismiss out of hand things they do not like.
Everyone's been saying that, I just wanted to explore a different facet of that premise without
simply dismissing it out of hand.
Did you even bother to look at the list I linked to, or did
you simply dismiss it out of hand?
Not exact matches
«I don't know if what the Archbishop said is true or not, but as a mere observer, it is frustrating to learn from Mr. Mills that certain ideas are
dismissed out of hand simply because they might cause offence.»
Athiests and many scientists
simply expect people to
dismiss religion and creationism
out of hand, and take a scientific I.O.U. for all
of the assumptions that they make.
Dalahäst If people actually questioned evolution it would be one thing, but almost everyone on here who criticizes it
simply dismisses all the evidence supporting it
out of hand, which is probably why you see that reaction.
Deniers, as both Lipstadt and Vidal - Naquet show, seem to have an endless supply
of polemical tricks and dodges: they
simply discount Jewish testimony
out of hand as lie or fantasy; inculpatory testimony from the Nazis themselves is said to have been coerced by the triumphant Allies; documents confirming such testimony are said to be forgeries; Nazi statements and memoranda about the Final Solution are taken at face value if they are euphemistically phrased, but are interpreted as hyperbolic or figurative if they are blunt and explicit; photographs and films
of executions are
dismissed as fakes.
By adroitly combining valid information with culturally affirming meanings, these communications succeed in getting people to reflectively assess evidence that they might otherwise
dismiss out of hand (btw, if your goal is not
simply to get people to open - mindedly consider evidence using their own powers
of reason — if you just want to make them believe something, who cares how — you are not a science communicator; you are a propagandist).
I don't
dismiss out of hand the choice to
simply deal with whatever consequences climate change brings, but rather it is my considered opinion that this would be the most foolish decision ever seen in history.