But generally speaking it was hard to see why a court should need expert evidence that was
simply expert opinion evidence, when it came to applying the standard laid down by the courts to the facts.
Generally speaking, it is hard to see why a court should need expert evidence in directors» disqualification proceedings that is
simply expert opinion evidence, when it comes to determining whether the conduct of a particular director has fallen short of the standard laid down by previous authority.
Not exact matches
The latter might
simply be described as scientific
evidence; the former as
expert evidence of
opinion.
Historically,
expert opinion evidence was given
simply by a notice, as described in Abell v. British Columbia (Greater Nanaimo Water District), 1979 CanLII 657 (BC SC), but now there are strict requirements.