Environmentalism has always sought to protect not
simply human safety and health, but also the natural world itself.
Not exact matches
An allegation can concern embezzlement, pouring out of toxic waste /
human waste into public waters, building
safety code violations, stating that those with AIDS should accept «god's punishment and
simply die», and on and on.
The real problem here isn't a lack of empirical evidence, it's
simply human psychology... For many investors, clinging to large - cap stocks provides an illusion of
safety.
Abandoned by their
human families or
simply lost, house cats eventually band together for
safety in groups called colonies.
Those of us who put our feet where our mouths are, and visa - versa, have been living
simply for decades, and, in my case have realised that very few are following, in fact things are going in the other direction, so the question is, how do we minimise the damage whilst we lack the influence to significantly change the growth / consumption philosophy (which is natural, but in
humans has too much power behind it for
safety) of society at large.
Sorry, everyone else who disagrees with Don's assessment of his actual experience (and mine as well), but the reality is
simply this...
humans look out for themselves first, then maybe others... if it does not endanger their own tenured positions of systemic
safety.