Sentences with phrase «simply know they exist»

It's not enough to simply know they exist and to know strategies to minimize them.

Not exact matches

I literally stumble across a new product or service, one that I would have bought ages ago if I knew it existed, but the business owner simply didn't think to mention it.

Without question, many reps will simply sign another one — either with their existing complex or with another wirehouse that's been recruiting them (colloquially known as a «prisoner exchange» within the biz).

The banks will argue hey are existing loans simply rolling over so we may not know the answer for a while on this point.

I know even some believers are offended by some of the things I write, but to them I'll simply say this: the Word of God is the most powerful thing that exists - both the written word and the Living word; and it's time to start believing God and to take hold of the ident.ity that He has given you and live and use that ident.ity Lance Wallnau calls it the «believers edge» which unfortunately only 8 % of the body of Christ ever gets into - that rare realm that individuals mature to the place where they have the power to co-create with God and bring the future into the present.

If you simply believe that there is no evidence that God exists, but know that it is not (and never will be) provable scientifically one way or the other, then you are an Agnostic.

you also know that deep down you don't want to simply die and cease to exist, you feel a longing for a connection, i believe we are all connected with the universe and i believe God created it.

And if existence simply allows for the possibility of god, then yes, one might exist, but we do not have any known, verifiable methods for discovering that god's nature and will.

They can not exist in the substance of bread since the bread is no longer present and they can not have their existence in the substance of Christ's body because the substance of a human body is not the proper substance for the accidents of bread: human bodies simply do not have the texture, colour, and so on, of bread.

I don't know for sure there is no god, simply because I can't prove a negative and can't prove that he does not exist.

No doubt there have been and are many people who have come to America simply to transplant their existing culture onto new soil — in fact, you can make the argument that that was how America was founded in the first place.

I simply think it's dishonest of Christians to claim they «know» a god exists when they don't.

Science and natural history as we know them simply did not exist, even though they owe a debt to the positive value given to space, time, matter and history by the biblical affirmation of creation.

Why are so many people so terrified of their own mortality that they continue believing childish myths well into adulthood simply to comfort themselves when in reality they know they don't really believe what the bible says, they just like the idea of never having to stop existing?

What existed before the Big - Bang What exists outside of our universe's «Bubble»... And lastly, why do you suffer from the delusion that you know everything, or maybe, more properly put, why do you believe that if you don't understand something, or don't like it, well then, it simply doesn't exist.

«And lastly, why do you suffer from the delusion that you know everything, or maybe more properly put, if you don't understand it or don't like it, well then, it simply doesn't exist.»

At least according to YOUR definition of «god» perhaps.By placing your «god» outside of the known universe, you then protect your flawed idea of a god from scrutiny, simply saying god doesn't have to play by the rules, is pure speculation in a) the existance of a «god» and b) where or how this «god» exists if not in our existance.

Satan and the demons know of Christ and they tremble, i would say that is them professing Jesus Christ exist... being born again is God taking «Possession» of your heart and mind... if we simply say «just believe» we also run the risk of a head confession without the heart, and we know only God brings repentance unto salvation and not Man or any form of Man doctrine!

They dislike the god they know so much they simply choose not to believe he exists... Which, of course, is the best lie that the Enemy has gotten folks to believe, that he doesn't exist.

Why is it not acceptable to simply concede that I don't know whether a god exists or not, when I've seen no evidence to show there is one nor have I seen any proof there isn't one?

Rights that are purchased at relatively low cost stand a fair chance of being abused, simply because there is no history behind them, and thus little pressure to use them responsibly — in short, because nobody knows why the right exists.

It just an admission that since it's impossible to prove or disprove the existence of god (s) you admit that you can not know for certain they do not exist, but you simply do not believe in them.

To him they don't exist and are simply a myth, fantasy, but some of us know they are real.

The pictures of him too, those are funny, because he's standing there claiming God isn't there, trying to rally people, and when it comes right down to it, he's simply ignorant of God existing, and doesn't know it.

Without the church, science as is known today simply wouldn't exist, simple as that.

If there is no eternal hell, they'll simply no longer exist — so if they never accept Christ, it's no big deal.

No, says Hartshorne; before Shakespeare actually existed, there was simply no entity Shakespeare to which «possible» or «impossible» (or any other predicate) could attach, the definiteness of Shakespeare being a creation added to antecedent reality and not present in it.

One can not claim the universe simply exists (i.e. no outside, creative initiator) but then claim somehow that the universe has rules.

Now, if you reach that point where you need to know or desire to God simply confess» I do not believe, if you exist please help me to find your truth»

No, you believe that God simply Existed, and had certain properties including the ability to make our universe.

As the nature of money and loans changed, the Church's teaching applied less and less frequently, and the Church simply stopped prohibiting a usury that no longer existed in modern circumstances.

Jefferson in his many words is todays paul by basically testifying to a lost society by preaching «The heart «that is what God wants not the shell which will rott away.I can stand with this truth until the day I die because I also have had disagreements in my church about this same topic.I dispise religion and encourage salvation which come from having a relationship with Jesus.Many may ask how do i have a relationship with him?by simply asking God through prayer, not what we know as pray but simply given up and telling God he win.That is what being righteous means saying «lord your're right and i will believe and obey that.Last i will like to thank jefferson for this clip, becuase for so long I have been feeling like todays churches in not like the first churches.They are stuck into their four cornered walls preaching to those who already obtain the word and people who already think they are perfect, but what about the weak and the sinners who we are suppose to love, go after, preach to, help and deliver the same way as Christ camed for the sinners so do we also be like him.Jefferson basically telling all us young people and old no matter who have suffered in the world, the church, or no matter what party or the past that there is hope and «God wants that person» not the sin but the person.Jefferson wants us to know that God can become personal with us and we do exist or can exist in the christian world not because we are perfect but because «he is perfect and he saw our broken spirits and rescued us!

The Christianity I knew said that what I was coming to see so clearly simply did not exist, had not existed since Jesus Christ.

Or did he simply not care about the millions of people who never even knew he existed, who worshiped pantheons of their own gods that reflected their own cultures?

If you are correct, then this ent!ty simply existed with nothing anywhere for who knows how long, and then one day, decided to make everything out of nothing.

Life, the patterns of life, and the force behind life, the life force or God, what creates life are observable but Physicists and Mathematicians can not measure them or apply their mathematics to it due to their limitations or scientific limitations and therefor this life force and God does not exist according to Atheists but the gravity force exists simply because Physicists and Mathematicians can measure this force, speed, acceleration, mass, but still do not know what it is or what creates gravity, it is also based on observation.

It would be far better to accept that there could be a heaven and they would see those they loved again than to believe that they would simply no longer exist.

2 We don't know if any «timeless ent.ities» exist or not — they are simply a philosophical idea.

Or, if we knew that the description in Exodus 19 has no external (archaeological) relationship to place, time, and event and that it is simply and intentionally metaphorical, we would be afforded the luxury of shedding at least for the moment the responsibilities of geographer - topographer - historian; we could then read the passage in the knowledge that here at least no clues exist to aid in the possible reconstruction of an actual event.

======== @Moby: «We don't know if any «timeless ent.ities» exist or not — they are simply a philosophical idea.

The are happy to know they will go to Heaven, but in a worse case senario, (by the Athiest belief) they would simply cease to exist at death.

The atheist simply looks at the event and concludes it looks like something one would expect if an all - powerful, all - knowing and all - loving god didn't exist.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

We simply do not know what creatures may exist elsewhere, and therefore we can not begin even to guess at other kinds of revelation which the Creator may have given, or may plan to give, in other parts of his apparently limitless creation.

But we are hopeless romanticists about this imaginary Big Woods — it simply no longer exists in any faintly viable form.

The club are spending no more money this window - unless an unknown no hoper, Sanogo style, from the French lower division comes for loose change — and this Scrooge club are simply trying to recoup the Lacazette fee from existing deadwood, reduce the wagebill and con us poor mug fans once again with lies about this or that big player being on the radar, when the truth is — as we cynics know very well, who have learned better from bitter experiience of the clubs constant lies — that no one of note is coming in and this dishonourable, shifty club continue to drag our former great name in the mud, with their corrupt misrunning of our once great and glorious club.

He also knows that he works with all the existing players, and there is no risk as in both personality and playing he will simply slot into the existing team, also the fans will see that Wenger and the board are working for the fans and the club, not themselves and their wallets, and they will become united behind Wenger and the club again, whilst the team will receive that much needed boost.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Surely, we thought, once the transmission of information accelerates to light speed, and everyone knows everything the moment it happens, gossip will simply cease to exist.

In the Lyme disease system, the researchers got around this confounding factor by looking at diversity in the unexpressed cassettes, which would not have been the object of direct selection because they have no known function on their own; they simply exist as a way of increasing the potential diversity of the VlsE protein.