Sentences with phrase «simply meant i wanted»

But then I realized my envy simply meant I wanted more freedom for myself.

Relevance might simply mean wanting to understand why so many young people have said that attending U2's Elevation Tour and hearing Bono close the show with choruses of «Hallelujah» was like being in worship (but a whole lot better).

That does not equate to a «reduction in government», it simply means they want to restrain federal fiscal policy.

This doesn't mean that you have been doing something «wrong;» it simply means she wants you to be comfortable.

Not exact matches

While in the past, these «Alexa skills» would have to be enabled — meaning a user would have to go into their Amazon Alexa app, search for the skill they wanted and turn it on — now, a user can bypass this step and simply ask Alexa anything.

This is a console aimed at folks who already have those problems solved and simply want a means to play Nintendo's biggest games.

Still, it's a depressing indictment of American society that she felt that simply going to a powerful man's hotel suite meant she had to have sex with him if he wanted to.

Most simply this means that they want to be able to buy in secret, so that they can capture as much of the benefit of their activism as possible.

Although token issuers do not want their projects labelled as securities, this designation wouldn't be the end of the world — it would simply mean the digital asset must follow existing rules and regulations.

The pin bar is simply a bar with a long tail and a very small body, preferably the bar should close in the direction opposite to the tail, meaning if you are going long you want the close higher than the open and if you are shorting you want the close lower than the open.

But even if they have what's called «inertia loyalty» to your competitor, meaning that they're sticking around simply because they don't want to deal with the nuisance of switching, you're still going to need to win them over before you can effectively pitch.

It is so sad that Islam is marked today by terrorists that I can tell you for sure they are NOT Muslims by any means; any one who harms any person or thinks of destruction to others is simply not a Muslim — Islam = Peace and not hate and those who practice islam as God want to be practiced know that God sai «Love for your brother what your love for thy self».

It is for each individual who is wanting to «follow Jesus» (whatever it means for them) to find out if they simply face a milestone of being unable to go any further because of understanding, decisions, weakness, confusion, woundedness, etc..

Freedom could mean simply «release», but more often it means that I / we / they can be or do whatever we want.

If one really wants to help, and not simply indulge the feelings of «commitment to racial justice» associated with yesteryear's liberalism, waking up will not mean walking away.

My education is fine... Nothing is wrong with my writing sense you were able to simply reply... Look how far this country has fallen without God... We took God out of schools and now school shootings are a common thing... I mean your insults are flattering because all it tells me is that deep down you know I am right but don't want to admit it..

Some people, who don't understand what a human society means, and simply want one that is efficient and scientific, see it the other way round.

If you are simply following some preacher's opinion on what the Bible secretly means without researching whether these aren't just things you want to hear, then you are being led blindly.

Posner even indicates some sympathy for those who want to prohibit those other abortions: «I do not mean to criticize anyone who believes, whether because of religious conviction, nonsectarian moral conviction, or simply a prudential belief that upholding the sacredness of human life whatever the circumstances is necessary to prevent us from sliding into barbarism, that abortion is always wrong and perhaps particularly so in late pregnancy, since all methods of late - term abortion are gruesome....

The word has this rich and varied meaning, not because one wants it to have it, or believes that it ought to have it, but simply because on can not talk about the Christian life without using the term «Christ» in this manifold way.

because you want us to fixate on one definition of supernatural that implies a god, without having any proof to make the connection, when there are other definitions that do not involve a god or magic, that simply mean we don't know.

Christ's willingness to offer his life simply means a conception of the world as being so evil that the Holy One unconditionally had to die — unless he wanted to become a sinner or a mediocrity in order to become a success in the world.

i simply want to know how the «newer» muslim phrophet (don't even know his name) taught his followers how to change the concept of violence as a means for jihad and / or self - defense into something that isn't violent (if that is what he did — i do not know except for this conversation).

Now I agree to stay within these bounds of meaning as long as we are simply trying to understand Bultmann, or to interpret him; but the moment we get beyond these tasks to the larger constructive task of a postliberal theology, I want to take issue with this way of dealing with myth.

Your difficulty is that you want to try to live in history without sinning... our effort to set up the Kingdom of God on earth ends in a perverse preference for tyranny, simply because the peace of tyranny means, at least, the absence of war (Love and Justice [Westminster, 1957]-RRB-.

The meaning of Malachi's phrase, then, is simply that God preferred Israel over Edom to be the people he wanted to work with to reach out to the world (See «How do you respond to Romans 9?

Jefferson in his many words is todays paul by basically testifying to a lost society by preaching «The heart «that is what God wants not the shell which will rott away.I can stand with this truth until the day I die because I also have had disagreements in my church about this same topic.I dispise religion and encourage salvation which come from having a relationship with Jesus.Many may ask how do i have a relationship with him?by simply asking God through prayer, not what we know as pray but simply given up and telling God he win.That is what being righteous means saying «lord your're right and i will believe and obey that.Last i will like to thank jefferson for this clip, becuase for so long I have been feeling like todays churches in not like the first churches.They are stuck into their four cornered walls preaching to those who already obtain the word and people who already think they are perfect, but what about the weak and the sinners who we are suppose to love, go after, preach to, help and deliver the same way as Christ camed for the sinners so do we also be like him.Jefferson basically telling all us young people and old no matter who have suffered in the world, the church, or no matter what party or the past that there is hope and «God wants that person» not the sin but the person.Jefferson wants us to know that God can become personal with us and we do exist or can exist in the christian world not because we are perfect but because «he is perfect and he saw our broken spirits and rescued us!

But I might mean by «I love you» simply that I want and need your help, your blessings, the benefits of having you on my side.

By «postmodern» I do not simply mean the period succeeding modernity, however one wants to date that.

By asking the question about begetting I simply wanted to show how a word may mean one thing to one person, but a different thing to someone else.

Otherwise, as Paul Ramsey has suggested in a neat rendering of the meaning of eros,» «I love you» may simply mean, in all sorts of subtle ways, «I love me, and want you.»»

When one deeply loves another, he wants sometimes simply to be with the other, while sometimes he wants to tell the other how much he loves him, how much the other means to him, to praise or adore the other (although doubtless we do not normally use just those words to say what we wish to do).

There are long passages in the beautiful book by Ramon Lull called The Lover and His Beloved (which for Lull meant God the Lover and man the beloved), in which the beloved simply adores the Lover, asking for nothing, wanting nothing, only loving.

Faith is not a means to truth, it is simply the end result of wanting to believe in something so bad regardless of the fact no evidence can substantiate your claim.

They don't want to believe it's true, as they're afraid they'll have to «give up» something, or «change» their ways, so simply going along with the rest of the «cool,» «intellectual,» horned - rim glasses wearing, hangin» out in coffee shops crowd is the route they choose (that was a bit mean - spirited, and stereotypical, but I couldn't resist).

Being busy simply means that I have less time for my family and for me than I should, and I didn't want to let...

Adding additional (or different) wet ingredients may mean you need to adjust your dry ingredients accordingly, so unless you're simply shaking a bit of cinnamon into your batter, you'll want to follow a recipe to make sure your flavored pancakes turn out perfectly.

I in no way mean to be negative about this, but simply want to point out the facts.

Simply means that he wanted to sell the Ox, as he is not world class.

As simple as that.All these young players will never develop under Wenger and to be honest i don't want him to spend any further monies, it will simply be a waste.I want this man out of Arsenal Fc and if that means we fall to mid table so be it.Achieving 4th place just keeps him his job and whats the point of that.The club needs CHANGE and with him in charge this will never happen.So we need to take some more pain before we get the gain

When a manager is sacked it doesn't mean he's useless, it simply means the club wants to try a different way of doing things.

I really don't understand the seeming assumption by some reporters / analyst that is Catalonian independence is fully realized (there's still a long way to go after a positive vote) that this means Barca (and perhaps Espanyol & Girona) can not simply continue in La Liga or would want to leave.

This doesn't mean that bettors who want to follow the action should wager 23.5 units on the game, but is simply a way to rank games receiving the most attention from sharp players.

and not to forget that although MMA is a sport, what UFC is doing is not sport - related, it is simply an entertainment show which they are trying to «sportify» and legitmise via various means (e.g. stupid rankings, reebok etc.) so they have created this double standards, whenever they want they talk about rankings and merits etc. and when the agenda is something else, they talk about «big fights» and money fights...

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I included this simply because I don't understand it, but it obviously means something to you and I wanted to be reasonable in replying to you.

Whether or not this is worth unbalancing the team is for Rodgers to decide but what is clear is that it simply doesn't work when they come up against a capable team, which means he must find a way of making it work if he wants any success.

Meaning, don't stress about trying to be more crafty than you want to be — simply pick something that feels fun and run with it.

The breastfeeding advocates I know aren't «mean», but they are honest and have a tough, tough job working in this bottlefeeding culture, trying to share information that many, many people simply don't want to hear.

For one it's stupid costly to rent car seats, in my experience rental places want upwards of $ 15 / day or more to rent a single car seat (I have been quoted $ 25 a day) after a few days you can exceed the cost of simply purchasing new... Meaning you could have purchased a brand new in the box car seat and checked that at the luggage counter complete with all it's factory packing that should allow it to arrive undamaged and you now have a backup or travel car seat complete with packaging... Second you have no idea about the condition of that rented car seat, as you imply, unseen damage is well unseen regardless of claims of «inspection» by the rental company, there is no way they can't tell if it's damaged if the damage is unseen, they are only doing visual checks nothing more... In the end there is nothing to assure you that your «rented» car seat will be in any better condition then one you brought with you or that it wasn't in an unreported «accident» from the previous renters or mishandled by the previous renters... If safety is you end goal, renting a car seat at your destination is not inline with that goal...