Sentences with phrase «simply money game»

Not exact matches

«I have to suspect they are getting some type of functionality beyond simply a game that is really popular and makes money,» he says.

If you're late to the retirement savings game, or simply don't think you have enough money saved up to live your American Dream comfortably after you stop working, it may be time to revisit some of your beliefs about saving money and investing.

A company with $ 10m of sales and something unique can double its profits in a year, a company with $ 1b in sales is simply too big to double it's profits in a year, it takes time and energy and capital for each incremental increase, and none of these factors is infinite» Adam Smith, The Money Game 1968

You get to begin with playing free Rummy games on - line, so that you simply only invest your hard - earned money when you get the dangle of taking part in basic indian Rummy card games within the virtual world.

«They simply can't stand that one or two of their rivals are playing the game and making a lot of money and making them look bad.»

Part of the reason for the inflated losses was simply the amount of money that was bet on the game, as $ 119.4 million was wagered in Nevada.

or simply trying to prove us all wrong again by showing that he could play just about anybody anywhere and win a game on the road against a top opponent; something he hasn't done in quite some time... regardless of the reasons, there is simply no excuse for the goings - on at this club... unfortunately it's unlikely that any real change will come without a dedicated effort on the part of those that feed the beast... our absentee landlord doesn't invest his own money into this club, so in order to force out Kroenke, Wenger and whatever other vermin currently haunt our hallowed halls we need to hit him where it really hurts... continually filling «his» stadium and the constant buying of endless merchandise, like one of the 58 different jerseys available over the last few years, makes us the greatest enablers of all time... have we no self - respect?

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

However, and this is where it gets complicated, while those values are dependent on how far the teams got in this season's competition, they are not considered prize money — the increased money is simply given for playing more games.

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

BUT unfortunately those qualities rarely win you things in the modern game so whoever we are linked with, let's just hope and pray they share the same romantic views of the beautiful game as Wenger does because once managers like Pep, Moanhino, Conte signals interest in any player we want, chances are they, the players will choose these 3 over us, simply because these teams have more money than us and most tellingly these managers are recently more successful and k knows how to win whilst Wenger seems lost and bereft of ideas in the last 10 years...

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

By simply fading every team receiving at least three - fourths of the money, $ 100 / game bettors would have earned $ 4,717 this season!

While comparing line movement with public betting trends can be useful in determining which teams are being pounded by sharp money, betting a game simply because of line movement is an easy way to blow through your bankroll.

Virtual reality is also becoming a tool to experience sports games and concerts, which could be good for children whose parents simply don't have the time or money to pay for real - life experiences of that nature.

Or if you need a quick version to study tonight's spelling list, simply use one of the game boards you already have and make up a quick game by replacing the game's money with spelling words, such as spelling «castle» or «shadow» to buy property in Monopoly.

That rhetoric simply isn't backed up in planning law, which regards even long established pubs as fair game for unaccountable owners to make money from by bulldozing or selling them, with no regard for local people who use them.

It «s pointless, it simply sucks.Don «t buy it, guys, «cause it «s a waste of money and time... I just did the mistake of buying it and i want to sell my retail copy to a friend that really (do n`t know why) wants the game.

It's a substandard but largely competent «AAA» game in a sea full of them, and those who do value the idea of content above all else will find more than their money's worth here... There's simply no reason to pick it up, however, if you've yet to try The Witcher 3, Shadow of Mordor or Batman: Arkham City.

I wont go into speculative reasons of their wrong behavior such as, premium shells rolling higher, matchmaking being rigged, or releasing overpowered pay to win content (then nerfing it when they release new pay to win content, aka planned obsolescence), or anything else which cant be verified but is widely thought as true, I will simply state the facts which are more than enough to show you this game is not worth your time or money.

This game feels like it was rushed simply so that it would make money quicker and it wouldn't coincide with Godseekers.

Hardcore fans of the genre who simply can't get enough of hacking and slashing through fantasy worlds will probably get their money's worth, but the rest should wait for the game to appear under Games for Gold program like the first part.

Animal Crossing: Switch will still outsell any home Animal Crossing, but it's going to fall way short of the handheld games simply for the reasons I mentioned, I'll stake any amount of money bet on that!

1 - 2 games which are — i bet my ass on it - only be medrioce, as japanese developers which are left for PS4 — simply wo n`t get the money in them - wo n`T change that.

So you have to spend a lot more money - even for the memory - cards of PS Vita — Games are lacking - its not that there are no games - no - there are simply no or nearly no GOOD GGames are lacking - its not that there are no games - no - there are simply no or nearly no GOOD Ggames - no - there are simply no or nearly no GOOD GAMESGAMES.

Some people simply don't have a ton of money, and piracy gives them a risk - free way to try games.

And then there are the many directors who won't even get a mention in the Oscar race because it is simply too crowded — Somewhere's Sofia Coppola, Toy Story 3's Lee Unkrich, Peter Weir for The Way Back, Oliver Stone for Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps, Doug Liman for Fair Game, the late George Hickenlooper for Casino Jack — it's just been a hell of a year for film.

Everything added to the game that impacts gameplay will be a free update — and if it isn't entirely free, you'll be able to purchase it with Fight Money, in - game currency that you earn simply by playing.

One might think if these testing companies were smart they would simply start making their test easier... Well here the catch 22 for them, while testing is lucrative, it not the big money in the game.

Some of the most popular freemium mobile games right now are Candy Crush, Clash of Clans, and The Simpsons, and it might surprise you to know that the average amount of money those companies make per user exceeds the $ 0.99 they would make if they simply charged for the game in the first place.

They don't reach out to other writers, they don't make connections in any meaningful way with the community, and simply buy into these vanity motivated «services» that stroke their egos, take their money, and teach them how to game the system.

For those not offering ebooks, the reasons range from capacity issues (simply not any money to get into the ebook game, or lack of tech support) to strategic caution about when to start spending dollars on ebooks (waiting to see what the best platform will be), and more.

I risk 2 % of my trading account on every trade so as my account goes up or down that determines how much is actually risked per trade so as my account goes up more money per trade is risked and when my account is going down less money per trade is at risk — simply put I would have to lose 50 trades in a row for my account to be wiped out completely so its simple mathematics that though not impossible, its highly unlikely that I would lose all my money before hitting a big trend and staying in the game.

He or she is simply playing the game because they want to win at it, not because they are «trying» to make money.

Yet I believe that in this case it was simply a failure to react properly to overshooting deadlines, rather than a malicious attempt to release a mess of a game and demand money for it, so I would still recommend that Phoenix Wright and Professor Layton fans in particular give this a try — just not yet.

Simply amassing a fortune and then bribing the Senate members proves to be a slightly more useful tactic as that way you can throw money at them just before you ask for a vote, but going through the entire game this way feels almost like cheating.

This Online Pass «scheme» is so successful that it would go on to appear on other EA franchises such as Battlefield, Mass Effect, Dead Space, Need for Speed and a variety of other games just to simply milk more money out of their consumer and products.

They claim their choice was so that users didn't end up with completely different versions of the game, but the cynical side of believes its far more likely that they simply didn't want to pour the money required into the project, and to be fair I can understand that as the install base on the Xbox One isn't nearly as large.

Gamers aren't simply going to continue cough up hard earned money just because EA wants more money.

Game writers start off exactly the same as Youtubers: people who love games that probably spend years writing about their hobby for free, struggling to make any money and simply doing it for the love.

Especially those that uses the West as a cash grab, giving little to no support, simply to get as much money off the Whales as possible to fund development for their own home Korean version of the game.

Simply put, when a game, TV show, or type of music attains status as a pop - culture icon, it makes a ton of money, then everyone in the industry tries to create their own version of it to capitalize on the craze.

Word quickly began to spread that WB Games cancelled the HD Mortal Kombat Arcade Collection with excuses ranging from that it simply wasn't worth the time and money being spent on it and that it would «confuse» consumers with the new MK game being on the shelves.

Dead alliance is a basic first person shooter with zombies elements in the gameplay for no other reason than to call it a zombie game, the survival mode contradicts itself and the multiplayer constantly has lag, you don't get a campaign even though they sell a single player expansion and at a price of # 20 / # 30 / # 35 depending how you buy it, I think it's a complete waste of your money and time, take a look around the internet to see what other think before you take my advice but quite simply put, if you're a fan of first person shooters then don't waste your time with this one.

You can level up by simply participating in any of the epic battles, but be prepared to spend a bit of money if you want the very best gear the game has to offer.

The sport - like aesthetic in no way suggests that this would in fact be a game that features shopping, albeit a stripped - down, abstract form of shopping that essentially consists in trading money earned in previous rounds for firearms and equipment while standing in a designated square known simply as a «Buy Zone» (the menu for which is pictured above).

They simply hit the point where the game has been «safe» for the initial few months where they particularly care about revenue, and so are now unlocking it to try and squeeze some more money with false sympathy for the anti-DRM crowd who buy into it and buckle under and get it.

It could be simply that the money for development has run out and plans for a multi-console launch have to be put on the backburner while the game is launched to recoup costs.

It seems odd, since Blizzard typically only hosts its own games via their launcher, but it seems it simply boiled down to a wise business decision for both sides: more money for Bungie, free marketing for Blizzard.