Sentences with phrase «simply says this change»

Nope... you simply say He changed the rules you don't like but that He still enforces the rules you do like.

«Having established a deep base of evidence in support of these rules, the EPA can't simply say it changed its mind.

Not exact matches

Think about going into the gym with purpose and to make a change, rather than going out of habit, or simply to say that you did so.

«If Apple thinks the lawsuit is a waste of resources it could simply end the matter by complying with existing law and filing a new proxy that unbundles the proposed changes to the charter so that shareholders can express their views on each matter separately,» a Greenlight spokesperson said in a statement Tuesday.

«Simply tell them that you plan for gifts in December of each year and you will consider making changes at that time,» Kramer said.

Still others are just blind to how life circumstances can change radically, with more than half saying they simply have no plan of retiring in the near future.

-LSB-...] «We're not changing physics here, some small businesses simply don't work,» Finkelstein said.

«The changing structure of global finance operations and the changing demands placed on the role will simply necessitate different types of experiences and skills,» said a joint report from the Institute of Management Accountants and the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.

«But simply poaching a business or an event from over the border does nothing for the national economy and short changes taxpayers,» he said.

Jennifer Hyman, Rent the Runway's chief executive, says that the changes are simply a natural step in the life of a fast - growing startup.

Fumbling for an answer, she simply said: «I changed careers.»

According to the New York Times, he said that Black Lives Matter activists need to be willing to sit down and actually discuss the issues with those who have the power to enact social change, instead of simply shouting at them from a distance.

«As cliché as it may sound, I simply decided to be the change I wanted to see,» Theodotou says.

Quite simply, Dutton says that empathizing with someone else's point of view is one of the most effective ways to change their mind.

If he had simply said AOL was changing how matching funds were applied, people would have groaned and then gotten over it, even though they were the ones taking the financial hit.

From «talking» cars to self - driving cars, what it means to build, own or simply drive a car will fundamentally change in the next 25 years, says Ford Chairman Bill Ford.

«It comes down to this engagement issue,» says Mizgala, emphasizing that the wealth industry simply hasn't kept up with the changing social realities surrounding women and wealth.

As Sonia said, your prospect is the hero of their own journey, so sometimes you're literally telling helpful stories (like case studies) and other times the story is simply the change in the prospect's life thanks to your content and eventually product or service.

The company describes its decision simply, saying the company «chose to manage employees in line with our values and beliefs and to engage governments, communities and other corporations in our effort to change, even if our efforts were unpopular or disruptive to normal business relationships.»

Advisors are simply going to change what they say and what they sell.

Ms. Kennedy - Glans infamously left the PC caucus days before Ms. Redford's resignation, saying that she was «increasingly convinced that elements of this 43 - year old government are simply unable to make the changes needed to achieve that dream of a better Alberta.»

Evolution says NOTHING about the origin of life, simply how it has changed over time.

Further, given the constantly changing goal - posts of a politics immersed in the emotivist chaos of competing psychological identities and subjective personal rights, why on earth would anyone now want to pursue a career that in five, ten, or fifteen years might be torn from them simply because somebody somewhere finds a right to goodness - knows - what in the Constitution — even, as in this case, when their job does not actually require them to be involved in said goodness - knows - what?

People that say they know the bible well are simply regurgitating information that has been translated; thus, changed repeatedly until the true meaning is lost.

Every activity of the organism, as Mead has observed, «altered the form of itself, and the form then handed on the change to the next generation.21 The effort of the organism to adapt itself to these circumstances may, as Bergson has said, be simply mechanical and external; but it may also involve consciousness and will.

but simply changing of words.for example «Jesus said...» changed to «He said..»

I will say this however; a truly just and beneficent God would also consider the separation of knowledge and understanding between this life, and the life before and after (that being the energy or spiritual existence as energy is not destroyed) and in so knowing this a just God or «father» would simply have the ending of the material life be a moment of coming home, learning, and changing over into understanding of all that occurred while we were away.

«We do not support those who are calling for the fall of the regime, simply because we are [for] the process of reform and changes,» said Yohanna Ibrahim, Syrian Orthodox Metropolitan of Aleppo, at a religious summit in France.

Taylor would say that in a secular age, where plausibility conditions have changed and our neighbors believe otherwise, our faith is «fragilized» simply because it is no longer axiomatic.

7 - If we defined growth as adding new material to our bodies, then DNA is living, because in the process of replication it add new sequences to its structure, but even in this case we have say it is non-living because DNA is not showing development which is the second part of growth, and simply development is the changes in structure living things undergo as it grow and age.

But changing the saying, we are saying that these commandments are simply too hard to follow, and because we are weak, because we are sinners, because we love to hate and to judge, we just need to stop saying «Hate the sin, love the sinner.»

If it is said of a «thing» that it «doesn't feel anything» and «has no life,» then the child denies the «thing» its own movement and spontaneity; a «thing» is something that is simply there and that, without any initiative from itself, endures movements and changes.

The lack of life change in the lives of many people is simply because they are not applying the words of Jesus seriously in their lives Change is definitely not automatic, as yochange in the lives of many people is simply because they are not applying the words of Jesus seriously in their lives Change is definitely not automatic, as yoChange is definitely not automatic, as you say.

Whey else would you say we may find ourselves changing, and there is a sacred quality in simply being who we are today?

Charles Hartshorne says that the notion that God is more perfect the more completely he is removed from change, time, and risk, is a prejudice which simply contradicts our experience of human love.13 What we have to look for is some explanation of why the tradition that perfect love is beyond suffering has such a powerful hold.

John Richardson Agreed, I am not arguing against evolution simply saying it does not change or impact the Bible story of creation.

Simply to say that you can have a woman - plus - woman marriage or a man - plus - man marriage is radically to change that because of the givenness of maleness and femaleness.

You correctly point out that if turning from sin is a requirement for salvation then our works are a necessary part of salvation; but I would go further and say that an unbeliever simply can not change their minds about sin.

«Many CPG teams tell us they are simply repurposing shelf packaging for ecommerce channels with little change, and that's a huge risk,» said Becky Donner, senior vice president of marketing, design and engineering at TricorBraun and the white paper author.

«There are so many things about her that can simply change a game,» Stone said.

what they have to do is be professional about their line of work but they can simply view it as their work and if you do nt like their performance as employee of the brand, you can demand change and criticise but just being disappointed with the results do nt give the fans the right to insult on such a low level like some guys on here and in this kind of view insulting a man who worked 20 years absolutely professionally for a club is just downright wrong, i never said you shouldnt criticise him

Secondly if, say for example, it worked and Vidal decided he would change his game slightly to a more sitting defensive role, it would quite simply be the end of Coquelin's budding career.

Now, some would say that Patterson simply changed shirts because he is a notably sweaty man.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

I'm not desperate for anyone's approval or agreement, I say what I think needs changed and simply react to the responses that come my way.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The answer is NO, the difference is these kind of players know when to.and.when not, so in that case like Wilshire himself keep saying hw will never change and will continue to get injured, not that he does not want to but simply because he does not possess the intelligence to..

Speaking of positive comments, sometimes simply stating that your daughter is wrong when she says, «I'm too fat» or «I can't do this» is not enough to change her mind.

Though I suppose, in fairness, there's an argument to be made for saying that facebook posts should simply be off limits given that facebook does sometimes change privacy settings without the users» permission.