Sentences with phrase «simply warm thoughts»

Not exact matches

@bloody: i thought it was not global warming but more simply explained as god is angry at us, maybe more specifically god is angrier at the east coast of the U.S. most recently.

I don't know if it's simply because of consumer demand and that people only think to buy cranberries in the fall, or if they don't grow well in the warmer climes of Florida or California and thus truly are only seasonally available.

My version is very similar to the original, except that I've added a bit more of certain ingredients, added some warm, African spices that I thought simply must be included, and I've slightly changed the cooking process.

When Elneny joined he was full of confidence and that's how you assess a player when he's at his very best otherwise a guy like Ozil will be considered trash taking by his last performances yet everyone goes back to his memory books to assess Ozil and the same should happen with Elneny who won back to back player of the month when he first joined and scored that screamer against Barcelona yet his all round contribution that made the headlines then came Xhaka on board and that is exactly when Elneny's form started slightly dipping because simply his confidence was shaken by finding himself a regular bench warmer instead of a regular like he was before Xhaka joining and I don't think Wenger addressed this psychological issue with Elneny or even noticed it probably because he had enough issues of his own.

SINGAPORE: Think that simply giving your baby a relaxing warm bath, then swaddling him and placing him in his cot will give him (and you) a full night's sleep?

As I argued here, I think this is meaningful and is a result, as shown by a myriad of polling questions, of people not warming to Gordon Brown — as much as they respect him they simply don't like him.

«In the past, astronomers thought that comets die when they are warmed by sunlight, causing their ices to simply vaporize away,» Jewitt said.

«I ate perfectly,» said the sound egotistical little voice in my head... «I don't need to do a multiple day cleanse, I am healthy, I cleanse every day via oil pulling, body brushing, bikram yoga, and warm lemon water upon waking» And I'd think... how can one simply just not eat when hours are spent in the kitchen with food?

To put the matter simply, the science of Dendrochronology uses tree ring Rings in fossilised pine trees have proven that the world was much warmer than previously thought - with measurements dating back to 138BC

To think of Abdellatif Kechiche's Blue Is the Warmest Color as simply a lesbian love story is border - line insulting.

But don't think of the new four - door performance saloon simply as a warmed - over version of BMW's midrange model.

Whether it is one of winter's coldest days or you are simply thinking ahead, it is literally vital to know how to keep puppies warm.

I think the best explanation as to why the «politics of fear» isn't working is simply because nobody has taken the time to map out and publicize the worst case scenario of global warming (perhaps it would be better put as «global heating»?)

QUOTE: «I think the best explanation as to why the «politics of fear» isn't working is simply because nobody has taken the time to map out and publicize the worst case scenario of global warming (perhaps it would be better put as «global heating»?)

Now, in the discussion of earthquakes, I think John Nissen was simply mentioning mechanisms for abrupt methane release, and thus wrote «e.g. as from an earthquake,» and Gavin pointed out that this would have little to do with warming.

I think the main reason it is often difficult to convince a lot of people of global warming science is because it is simply harder to present a tangible and irrefutable example of the science at work.

(My thinking is that even if part of the warming on Earth has been caused by increasing solar output, that simply means we must redouble our efforts to do what we can to reduce GHGs, esp.

I often think what would happen if we could simply point to a group of dark, scary men from another culture who talk funny and hate us and «prove» that they are causing global warming.

What simply amazes me (TonyB seems to agree) is that U.K. and other jurisdictions have enacted laws to mandate greenhouse gas reductions with HUGE impact on the taxpayers» lives without any evidence that they have even thought about the effectiveness of their programs in actually reducing global warming.

Henry@Willis I think to explain the phenomena of why the oceans do not get warmer than 30 - 33C When the top layer of molecules of the water in the reservoir reaches a certain temp., namely the boiling point at ruling pressure, it simply evaporates and thereby it cools the remaining liquid in the reservoir.

CH, if you have some idea of what is going to happen with the extra 5 W / m2 forcing in the 21st century, you need to say it, because otherwise people will just think it will simply get warmer like the last time the earth had so much CO2 which was in the Eocene epoch (a pre-Antarctic ice shelf period).

The IPCC consider that CO2 caused and drove the late 1970s to late 1990s warming simply because they could not think of any other explanation that could explain that warming.

NASA thought this to be erroneous, so they simply removed from the data set those buoys that were showing the greatest amount of cooling, and hey presto ARGO suggested ocean warming.

It seems obvious that some form of adaptation will be necessary (unless you think climate change isn't happening) and it seems clear that reducing the risk of the most severe impacts will require reductions in GHG emissions (unless you think GHGs don't produce warming, or you think that the higher climate sensitivity values are simply impossible).

is somewhat different from «we all agree CO2 is a GHG and it is simply a matter of how much warming it will cause» or words to that effect which I think is where Richard used to be.

However, given that the CAGW position doesn't rest on specific numbers, but is instead an unorganized collection of anecdotal evidence, coupled with heavily - tweaked computer models, unfounded assumptions about positive feedbacks, and a healthy imagination about possible future disasters, a lower warming number for the 20th century will simply be brushed over with claims about aerosols being stronger than previously thought, more warming still waiting in the «pipeline» or similar ad hoc «explanations» that keep the overall story alive.

«I think one unintended outcome of the Paris Agreement was that it made the public think limiting warming to 1.5 C is possible with only marginally stronger policy from government on reducing emissions and this is simply not the case.»

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

If fact it's probably a better idea to think of La Nina simply being more efficient heat uptake by the ocean, and El Nino being less efficient heat uptake, with a consequence of less or more heat being available to transfer to the atmosphere, than to think of El Nino as warming and La Nina as cooling.

I am thinking that is a little simplistic, but the whole exercise is doomed anyway because we simply do not have data going far enough back to know whether the current warming is exceptional.

If that is the measure then it could be simply that the public accepts that 97 percent of climate scientists meme that the earth's most recent spat of warming is human caused, but they don't think it really matters.

But if you are going to simply be thunderstruck that some people don't trust climate scientists, then don't post a chart that is a great example of why people think that a lot of global warming science is garbage.

This is perfect for keeping your favorite certain someone warm and cozy even on the coldest of evenings, and the message will warm their heart at the same time.Finally, put your thinking cap on and simply get them something you know they'll love or use.

I have a big test swatch of Simply White on my wall now, but I think I need something warmer.