Indeed, models do
simulate similar warming for different reasons as discussed in e.g., Knutti, 2008.
Not exact matches
This study was the first to
simulate whole ecosystem
warming in the arctic, including permafrost degradation,
similar to what is projected to happen as a result of climate change.
Similar to climate manipulation plots near the Colorado River, half of these plots are
warmed with infrared lamps to
simulate the future.
Figure 3 is a
similar graphic to that presented in Meehl et al. (2004), comparing the average global surface
warming simulated by the model using natural forcings only (blue), anthropogenic forcings only (red), and the combination of the two (gray).
The
simulated MAT is very
similar to the PI, whereas the LIG - 130 and LIG - 125 MAT simulations resulted in significantly
warmer temperatures.
Wynant et al. showed a
similar negative overall feedback with
warming over all latitudes, based on model simulations using superparameterization to better
simulate cloud behavior.
Before ∼ 1980, the
simulated probability of a
warm — dry year is approximately half that of a dry year (Fig. 4B),
similar to observations (Figs. 1B and 2).
The magnitude and inter-model range of
simulated warming over high northern latitudes are very
similar in the high - end and non-high-end models, which indicates that the biases among the models are larger than the climate change signal.