Pentecostals also are more Eastern than Western in that, as it was for John Wesley, there is an emphasis on
sin as a sickness that needs to be healed, as opposed to just a legal problem to be dealt with in judicial terms.
Not exact matches
Looking at addiction
as «
sin» hasn't done mankind very much good for almost two thousand years; treating addiction — and other mental illnesses —
as sickness rather than
as moral failings or demonic possession has a much better track record, and it took less than 150 years to get there.
It is possible to believe in Jesus for eternal life (and of course, receive eternal life
as a result), but still not be «saved» from many of the temporal and physical consequences of
sin, or from
sickness, or from enemies, or from many of the other negative things that can happen in life.
After a short introduction there are five chapters: 1) Baptism
as Cleansing from
Sin and
Sickness; 2) Incorporation into the Community; 3) Baptism
as Sanctifying and Illuminative; 4) Baptism
as Dying and Rising; 5) Baptism
as the Beginning of the New Creation.
Is it less «monstrous and repulsive» [
as Dilthey had stigmatized the doctrine of original
sin] that
sickness and misery are inherited from generation to generation?
I'll focus on your problem with the word evil (
as for the eastern stuff, I'm aware that try see it
as a
sickness, but there is also an acknowledgement of human
sin and evil.
Alcoholism begins
as a personal
sin and ends
as a
sickness.
In Jesus» day (
as in ours, though to a lesser degree), people associated
sickness with
sin.
Jesus practiced the genuine spiritual life according all matter and material sense with all its
sin,
sickness and death
as nothing in contradistinction to the Life, Truth and Love, of Spirit.
Long ago we carried up to our mental attic
as outworn the notion that
sin is responsible for
sickness.
We should not toss away
as outgrown the belief that
sickness is retribution for
sin.
Then, in an extremely useful review of «
sin,
sickness, alcoholism, and drug addictions,» Clinebell mentions several of a «confusing variety of usages,» applied,
as he says, now and again to alcoholism and other substance addictions — several of which are not mutually exclusive: 1.
I myself will never adopt an understanding that the power to overcome «disease» or
sin or «
sickness» or whatever alcoholism is, can be received from, or operated with, «something» or «somebody» or a «power greater than myself» or a «higher power» or a «group» or a light bulb, chair, bulldozer, goddess, doorknob, radiator or any of the other «absurd names for God» (
as Rev. Sam Shoemaker, our «cofounder» described them).
At no point are they
sickness» [«substance addiction begins
as the
sin of drinking or using drugs, progresses to the greater
sin of excessive use (abuse), and ends
as a sinful habit» — a view Clinebell attributes to rescue missions].
What mattered to Jesus was his mission to speak to men in their
sin and call them to repentance, to set before them the mercy and goodness of God, to heal men's
sickness of body and soul through the power of God, to call all who would listen to love God supremely and their fellow men
as their own selves.
Because this was a rescue, this was redemption, this was the death that made death die, this was the moment when all of creation was redeemed
as Jesus swept into the domain of death and hell, suffering and
sickness,
sin and horror, to cure us and then rise again victorious, Christus Victor.
Regarding the man with the bedroll:
Sickness often does come
as a result of
sin.
What he says about the forms of human despair and the
sickness of the spirit is not intended
as objective description of
sin.
As Christians, we believe this side of heaven all disease,
sickness and pain is rooted in a world broken by
sin.
In fact, we are told
as Christians, when, not if, but when we
sin [issues /
sickness] we are to repent and we will be forgiven.