Responding to the kind of theology that suggests hurricanes and earthquakes and school shootings happen because an angry God has lost his temper and is unleashing his wrath and discipline on people whose
sin nature makes them incapable of understanding such actions as loving, Kat R. writes:
Not exact matches
God
made me gay... it would be a
sin for me to try to go against my God - given
nature!
Sin against God and
nature continues to beget misery upon the human family until we each
make a concerted effort to lead lives worthy of a human being
made in the image and likeness of their Creator.
Sin has
made it so very, very hard for us, but no other law of truth can be given to our
nature simply because it is fallen.
Even though the two scholars represent opposite ends of the evangelical spectrum on salvation, both
made essentially the same allegation: the wording seems, at best, theologically careless and, at worst, represents a heretical understanding of
sin, human
nature, and the human will.
Oh, the Calvinists could
make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in
sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our
sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my
sin nature I can not trust it.
we are born with a
nature of
sin, that which is unlike God, hence, Jesus tells Nicodemus, «You must be born again», even going so far as to
make a distinction between that which is flesh and that which is spirit.
«Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, when he was about to offer himself once on the altar of the Cross to God the Father,
making intercession by means of his death, so that he might gain there an eternal redemption, since his priesthood was not to be extinguished by death, at the last Supper, «on the night that he was handed over», left to his beloved Spouse the Church a visible sacrifice, such as the
nature of man requires, by which the bloody sacrifice achieved once upon the Cross might be represented and its memory endure until the end of the age, and its saving power be applied to the remission of those
sins which are daily committed by us.»
They had inculcated a deep sense of
sin and a conscious need of personal salvation; they had overpassed national and racial lines and had
made religious faith a matter of individual conviction; they had emphasized faith in immortality and the need of assurance concerning it; they had bound their devotees together in mystical societies of brethren fired with propagandist zeal; and they had accentuated the interior
nature of religious experience in terms of an, indwelling Presence, through whom human life could be «deicized.»
No attributing to
nature, survival of the fittest or any other rationalization will
make this reality of
sin go away.
There were choices in my life that I chose to
make, and there were circumstances that helped my
sin nature to divulge into partcipating in the
sin.
Also there is such a thing as the flesh which is our own sinful
nature that
makes us
sin.
It could still be argued that these roles impose strain on womanly
nature; that they are not what women are
made for; that they show a certain lack of respect for God's work of creation; that in fulfilling them a woman is likely to treat men maternally, which will impose undue strain on masculine
nature; and that the woman's womanly dignity and worth are to some extent at risk while she does these jobs; but it could not be maintained that she and those who gave her her role have
sinned by disobeying God's command.
He rang the changes on
sin more eloquently than anyone of our time, but that dissection, set forth with particularly telling power in the first volume of his Gifford Lectures, was followed by a second volume in which his acknowledgment of the power of the gospel as grace
made it possible for him to speak of «the agape of the Kingdom of God [as] a resource for the infinite development towards a more perfect brotherhood in history» (The
Nature and Destiny of Man, II [Scribner's, 1943], p. 85)
Despite the popular notion that the church identifies sex with
sin, the genuinely Christian view of human
nature makes no such statement.
Tommy God has already forgiven you for your
sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your
sin in full past present future.It is not
sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like
sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our
nature only Christ can do that our old
nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a
made a real mess of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your
sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the
sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will
make you a new man and
sin will not have dominion over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to
sin i know what it is like to have been set free by the power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz
John Cobb, too, has discussed aspects of the
nature of man, such as freedom, responsibility, and
sin, from a Whiteheadian point of view.151 Like existentialism, he writes, process thought
makes subjective categories central to the analysis of man, and it understands subjectivity to be «in a very important sense causa sui,» that is, self - determinative.
Although this is not the place to discuss at greater length the
nature of evil, human
sin, suffering, death and the relationship between them, they must find mention here for they constitute the chief problems which continually confront man and
make him question whether there is any justice or meaning to be found in life.
Liberal theology has always tended to obscure the
nature of
sin while Neo-orthodoxy has not
made clear how redemption actually
makes any difference in this life in this world.
But I think I would prefer to say that our
nature, but not his, is stained by
sin; it is not destroyed, just
made ugly, irreversably — except of course by that best of all stain removers, the blood of Jesus.
Just as God, who is ever and by
nature sinless and can not
sin, comes to the sinful world because he loves it, so the saint goes into the world because the holiness of God has
made him real and overflows his humanity into human fellowship.
From another perspective if satan was his father it is to easy to apportion the blame to him i couldnt help it as my father is satan the truth is every one of us has
sinned and fallen short and so we are responsible for our actions just the same as Cain.The devil did nt
make him do it he influenced his evil thoughts no doubt but the decision to kill his brother was his alone.Its the same arguement because of my parents because of my upbringing i couldnt help myself we all need to take responsibility for our own actions.If we are honest we choose to
sin because we like to
sin that is our
nature our hearts are deceitfully wicked.Whats the answer repent and submit yourselves to God so that he can give us new hearts that do nt want to
sin but want to please God.brentnz
The effects of the first human
sin would actually be analogous to a terrible earthquake, devastating human
nature and making man's place in Nature ins
nature and
making man's place in
Nature ins
Nature insecure.
They will know that whatever may be the real and ultimate truth of God's being and purpose (and it must be, in the
nature of the case, far beyond our knowing), we never approach so near to that truth as when we say with Paul, «God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us,» or with the author of the Fourth Gospel, «God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son,» or with still another of those upon whom the light first shone,» Because of the great love wherewith he hath loved us, God hath
made us, who were dead in
sins, to live again with Christ.»
That is a claim that I've never heard anyone
make: «My New
nature is incapable of
making mistakes and
sinning».
My New
nature is incapable of
making mistakes and
sinning (Romans 7 & 8) So ultimately God Living in me does not
sin or
make mistakes.
My emotional
nature was stirred to its depths; confessions of depravity and pleading with God for salvation from
sin made me oblivious of all surroundings.
Christ is
sinned against, I believe, when anything less than this universal, complete love is
made central, either to God's
nature and purpose, or to man's
nature and destiny.
Here Niebuhr
makes full use of Kierkegaard's analysis of the
nature of
sin, and then brilliantly examines the actual way in which men estimate their own good and power and that of others.
This is
made apparent during a scene in which the patriarch's son questions
sin nature, only to be harshly silenced by his father for daring to doubt his father's beliefs.
Knowing I have a
sin nature and that
nature is as capable as anyone with that
nature to do evil
makes us equals - the only difference between me and anyone not a Christian is the bold of Christ - on that principle we meet learn the Word and doctrine and if need be share our pain and temptations and learn to trust God and each other.
All Christians know, of course, that it is through God's self - outpouring upon the cross that we are saved, and that we are
made able by grace to participate in Christ's suffering; but this should not obscure that other truth revealed at Easter: that the incarnate God enters «this cosmos» not simply to disclose its immanent rationality, but to break the boundaries of fallen
nature asunder, and to refashion creation after its ancient beauty» wherein neither
sin nor death had any place.
Though it is popular to say that God can do whatever He wants, God can not do what is logically impossible (such as
make a round square), do anything that violates His own
nature (such a
sin), or do anything that goes against something He has already decided and determined (such as give humans free will).
We seek to love and be loved but original and actual
sin has
made it much more difficult to follow the promptings of our spiritual
nature, the soul, to seek our own true good.
The Godless Monster is right, people try and influence, control, manipulate, ect in every area of life when they have a position of authority, thats human
nature, or the
sin nature of man if you like.Because the church has a lot of organisation, its a hot bed of oppitunity for people with ideas or assperations to lead or control to position themselves, and once there become protective of their role, it gives them a voice.You will find them in schools, governments, offices, everywhere.IT really
makes no difference if it christian or athiest place, its people being people
So natural has
sin become to him, or
sin has so become his second
nature, that he finds the daily continuance quite a matter of course, and it is only when by a new
sin he acquires as it were new headway that for an instant he is
made aware.
But Paul
makes it perfectly clear that we can overcome that inherent
sin nature through Christ.
So i have to simplify it down to what i KNOW: 1)
nature shows me there is a God 2) totally
makes sense that He would have to come here Himself as one of His own creation and let the
sin kill him so that Life could be reborn, and 3) I feel powerful love for fellow humanoids.
Through painting, video, collage, sculpture, performance and installation by huber.huber, Manuel Mathieu, Mark Salvatus, Rachel McCrae, Victoria
Sin, Omer Even - Paz, and a lecture - performance by Alex Anikina, Will
Nature Make A Man of Me Yet?