Sentences with phrase «since only god»

Sixteen - year - old star to play aspiring model in LA - set horror, Refn's first feature since Only God Forgives

Of course, God is unique since only God conditions every successive moment.

I would rather have this kind of faith in God, than placing my faith in educated scholars who claim superior, accurate Bible knowledge, since only God CAN know their hearts and true intentions.

Freedom can never be absolute, since only God is abk solute, and will always have to be subject to some kind of regulation in any specific setting.

Yes, l it would be foolish for a medical doctor to speculate as to the health condition of a human being since only God knows!

Otherwise, since only God knows truly who is good and who is bad and this info is not given to us we can not hate anyone.

Not exact matches

This is funny since he only thinks there was a god because like most people that's what's been drummed into their heads by preachers and society as a whole....

I suggest to you that only the God of the Bible has the Character to produce and govern all these things, since they spring from His very nature.

Not all believers share the same interpretation of the Bible or theology and haven't since the beginning of the church — that is not what binds us together and it's not our place to pass judgement on someone else's standing with God — only He can do that.

Since Hell's purpose is to hold those who have rebelled against God - to separate them from God's Holy presence, it would follow that it would have been created only as a consequence of those rebellions.

I know what the book «Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus» says, but not only was it poorly researched, but the idea in the title itself, since men and women both originate from God, is unscriptural.

Unless it was meant for us as a new system to drop Republican systems for the Royalist systems that are taking place now that Jordan and Morocco both Royelists are planed to join GCC as one with a change to the name of the GCC since the Royalist empire will be extending to countries outer of the Arabian Gulf Countries... What ever it is all we need is freedom of rights, justice, peace, equality and to live in prosperity... Egypt is not in the heart of Egyptions only but as well in the heart of every Arabic nation, Egyptions were our teachers in our schools and Egypt was the university of our Yemeni students... Egypt was the source of islamic educations, Egypt was the face of all arts, books, papers, TV plays and movies to all of Arabian speaking countries... Egypt is our Arabian Icon so please please other nations are becoming larger and stronger in the area on your account as a living icon for the Arabian Unity what ever our faiths or beliefs are we are brothers in blood, culture and language, God Bless to All.Amen.

In fact, by failing to do so, you become a culprit by not probing their minds to make sure that whether they are aware of this biblical truth and hence being perished and away from that everlasting love for eternity — and for this very reason and negligence or misguidance, you will be responsible and accountable when you meet with your creator God of love whom he also loved you so much that if you were the only person living on the face of this earth and planet, still he would have come and died for you and the forgiveness of your since and loving you unconditional.

Dear I know nothing would happen on earth with out the will of God... what ever happened or where ever prophets and messengers were before were sent to earth is not the issue since God said in the Quran that he God took the convent of all the prophets before sending them to call their people into worshipping God only and not to mislead people into worshipping them instead... This is the point here that the message was that (God is One and Only Nor he has a Mate or a Son or any Partners among Mankind or Jinn or Angelsonly and not to mislead people into worshipping them instead... This is the point here that the message was that (God is One and Only Nor he has a Mate or a Son or any Partners among Mankind or Jinn or AngelsOnly Nor he has a Mate or a Son or any Partners among Mankind or Jinn or Angels)...

Only theists can hate god, since they believe god to exist.

Peter and Judas» sins were one and the same and it is in no way our place to say where they are, since we will only be giving an account for our own actions when we stand before God someday.

Being Agnostic is the only reasonable stance to take since it is impossible to prove Gods existence either way.

Since from what you say «not assigning gods nonexistence a «true»» you aren't rejecting the possibility of a God only it can't be proven which like you said would be Agnostic Atheist and is not the same as someone who claims there is no god and rejects the possibility of God only it can't be proven which like you said would be Agnostic Atheist and is not the same as someone who claims there is no god and rejects the possibility of god and rejects the possibility of it.

Without answering a question you maintain that since slavery was a common practice back then, that god was only setting rules for the people of the time.

If it is only the one god, then I must point out that you, too, don't believe, since there are thousands of gods in whom you could believe but do not.

Each side sends out as many gullible followers as they can find or buy and they send them to an agreed upon place where they bash eachothers heads in and stab at eachother with spears and arrows and eventually only a few survivors will wander back to their masters covered in blood and wounds and claim Truth for their side, since whichever side won was obviously God's chosen ones...

made Since there is only evidence that men made your bible, complete with many, many flaws, it is far more likely that your book is part of the deception of men, than any gods having anything to do with it.

to think some imagined «god» is going to give you some measure of justice is absurd, since it will only be what you imagine.

Aguest9 Nostradomus Since you are both well versed in the Bible you certainly are aware that the only unpardonable sin is rejecting God.

By your standard, everyone might as well live in hedonism and selfishness, since no one can be good anyway and people are only saved by God's grace / mercy.

Since you are making the claim that there is no such God and I'm only making the claim of belief in such a being, then guess who has the burden of proof to establish their claim; that is unless you are making the claim that you only believe that there is no such God.

Since they can do nothing to assure their election, they only have a dim hope of being chosen by God.

Since God did not save us to individualistic lives but rather saved us into a community with Him in Christ, election is not only about individuals being saved.

Hence, only the first interpretation is meaningful, and it can not be used to deduce from the existence of (genuine) moral evil the nonexistence of benevolent omnipotence, since «whether the free men created by God would always do what is right would presumably be up to them» (GPE 271).

I also feel that since we are made in Gods image that since the separation due to choice of sin the garden, we have a designed longing that only can be filled by God.

Since his God has only a «primordial nature» and a «consequent nature,» he invented a third,» «superjective» nature» to meet the parallelism (cf. PS 3:228 f).

Since the whole world lies in the power of the evil one (1 John 5:19)-- saturated in darkness; the only way out is the Spirit of God, 1 John 1:5 - 7.

If we don't pray in the Spirit, essentially we are just uttering vain words that accomplish nothing, since God will only answer the prayers which are aligned with His will.

Again, I am only trying to point out that this a much more complicated than most people want to make it, and since none of us are God, we don't really know.

This infinitely deeper grief is essentially the prerogative of the superior, since only he likewise understands the misunderstanding; in reality it belongs to the God alone, and no human relationship can afford a valid analogy.

That was all I said and meant but you are trying to frame me with word not said by me and I know why it is about shutting me up for good never mind may God make your curses blessings for me since he alone knows what's in my heart for all humans in love of God only.?!

Since the meaning of life and love as we use these terms is necessarily derived from the finite sphere, we would be forced to acknowledge that our use of these terms with respect to God could only be ejaculatory — in no way cognitive.

Once God had decided upon this predestination of Christ's human nature, then he willed the union of Christ's divine nature with his human nature in the person of Christ since only a human nature united to the divine nature in one person could love to the highest extent, the extent to which God loves.

Since God is He Who Is, that is, pure being, every attribute of God is only a way of speaking of his one act of existing.

It should also be noted that Jesus instructed his followers to not call anyone father, since we have only one Father, God in heaven (Matt 23:8 - 11).

This remains true despite the reality of divine revelation, since, according to Islam, God does not reveal himself, but only the decrees of his will.

According to the New Testament, this experience of the indwelling presence of God is the essential source of the Christian's power (Acts 18) and of his peace and joy; (Romans 14:17) it is the best gift which the Father can bestow on his children; (Luke 11:13; John 14:26) it is the secret alike of moral renewal (Titus 3:5) and of practical guidance; (Acts 13:2) it furnishes the interior standards of motive and behavior which must not be violated; (Ephesians 4:30) whatever else in Christian faith is valuable, even though it be the love of God, becomes effective only when this experience makes it inwardly real; (Romans 5:5) and the temple is easily dispensable since to every Christian it can be said, «Know ye not that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit which is in you?»

In confining God's revelation to the written word, sola scriptura theology not only cut itself off from much of the rich trinitarian thinking since Nicaea, but limited revelation to the exigencies of human salvation.

(If Thomists acknowledge these terms to be literal, they must also understand them as negations, since only negative statements about God are literal.

This does not, however, imply that the results are no good, since they are largely the only good sources of insight into ancient Israel and their knowledge of Yahweh, their God.

actually there is no free will, because we humans is part of god, our conciousness is his.therefore everything we do has a purpose only beyond our immediate comprehension or understanding.the problem lies in our concept or belief of the absoluteness of the philosophy of science, which by itself is part of gods evolutionary process, atheists has this mentality, but since they are part of the process so its gods will through us.

Just as in that seed there were together (simul) invisibly all the things which would in time develop into the tree, so the world itself is to be thought to have had together — since God created all things together — all the things which were made in it and with it when the day was made, not only the heavens with the sun and the moon and the constellations... and the earth and the abysses... but also those things which the water and the earth produced potentially and causally, before they should rise in the course of time in the way we now know them, through those operations which God carries on even until now.8

God's own creative accomplishments must also be determined sequentially, not primordially nor eternally, since a «fully specified» object only occurs when it is determined, and the possibilities for new (and simultaneously incompatible) determinations are endless.

Ogden seems to take this to mean that all are equally responsible for not actualizing authentic existence, since the primordial revelation of God already contained the content of the revelation in Jesus the Christ.50 This is, of course, the basis for Ogden's well - known rejection of the distinction between Christian existence as a «possibility in principle» for all men but a «possibility in fact» only for some.51

If it is primarily applied to the first element, it is a positive, but not an exclusive statement, since the saving power and importance of the redemptive work of Christ (as the worship of God and the sanctification of man) affect man not only through their cultic presentation in the liturgy.