And
since biblical revelation always has the character of unpredictability, in that its arrival transcends our anticipations, its justification would strain critical thinking beyond its usual limits.
Not exact matches
I am sorry I ever used it, particularly
since the project for «demythologizing» the Bible has been undertaken and bids fair to reduce the
Biblical revelation to eternally valid truths without any existential encounters between God and man.
Since Catholics believe in tradition as a channel of
revelation, they do not expect everything to be demonstrable from
biblical evidence alone, nor by means of neutral historical research.
Since we are making at least as many mistakes, we desperately need the insight of other Christian leaders who are striving to submit their total lives to
biblical revelation.
Wollstonecraft's analysis is also applicable to the Christian church today
since most churches are still based, if not in governance at least in theology, on authoritarian relationships: God / people, pope / church, bishop / priest, priest / laity,
biblical revelation / natural theology, Christianity / other religions, tradition / modernity, theologians of the past / theologians of the present, etc..