The vignette seems to be set in a time and place where nature and people collide, where people and natural habitat encroach upon each other, and where time has no clear recognition of a particular era — it could be anywhere, almost at any modern time,
since humans and nature are always intersecting and at odds with each other.
Not exact matches
The ignorance bred by religion regarding what
human beings as containing a ghost in the machine led the way for the misconceptions believed by communists regarding
human beings as blank slates,
since both religion
and communists envisioned
human beings in this flawed conceptual manner, denying the evolved components of the brain
and the innate
nature we are born with due to our genetic make up.
And thus it has been ever since: All of us must «come down to the level adopted by God himself in his Incarnation — the level of poverty, crib, flight...» Yet in lowering ourselves to the lowliness that God himself assumes in taking on a human nature, we remain who we are: Some are intellectually gifted and rich in the world's goods; others are impoverished in various wa
And thus it has been ever
since: All of us must «come down to the level adopted by God himself in his Incarnation — the level of poverty, crib, flight...» Yet in lowering ourselves to the lowliness that God himself assumes in taking on a
human nature, we remain who we are: Some are intellectually gifted
and rich in the world's goods; others are impoverished in various wa
and rich in the world's goods; others are impoverished in various ways.
Since we come from God
and are going to God, we can say that the
human person is, of his very
nature, a religious being.
First,
since process thought concerns itself with the totality of
human experience, it must necessarily take very seriously the fact of the religious vision
and the claim of countless millions of people of every race
and nation
and age to have enjoyed some kind of contact with a reality greater than humankind or
nature, through which refreshment
and companionship have been given.
The importance of the changes that have taken place in economics largely
since the Keynesian revolution does not lie principally in the many new practical devices
and theoretical discoveries that have been made, but in the picture of
human nature implicit in the newer views.
Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand
and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin
and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate
since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride
and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow
human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love
and morality
and right
and wrong is so corrupted by my sin
nature I can not trust it.
Since there was a «seed» of this cosmic principle of reason in each
and every
human being,
humans, through the exercise of reason, could understand the
nature of reality
and seek «the good life.»
In taking this sixth step, Christians affirm that the «tendency toward the
human and the humane (toward «Christ») in the ultimate
nature of things» which has existed
since the beginning of time «has become evident
and clear only now in the new order of relationships just coming into view» in the Christian community To be sure, «any community which becomes a vehicle in history of more profoundly humane patterns of life» can be a part of this new order, but the events around Jesus have at least a kind of priority as its first clear manifestation.
Anything made by
nature will decay in time,
and anything made by man will have faults,
since humans are imperfect,
and will fail in time as well.
I would note that while «the poor will always be with you»,
since we acknowledge that the number of people «caught in the bear trap» goes up
and down over time with the business cycle,
and human nature is largely consistent in aggregate, that
human nature alone can not explain why people end up in poverty.
His good creation was not intended to function this way, but
since He gave
humans, angels,
and even animals (to a degree) the freedom to make genuine choices, we sometimes use this freedom in ways that are contrary to the will
and desire of God,
and when we do this, the forces of
nature suffer the consequences,
and chaos rages over the face of earth, wreaking havoc, destroying lives,
and bringing destruction in its wake.
Conservatives cherry - pick those passages that support their conservative view of God based on their conservative ego,
and vice versa, where liberals are concerned...
and there is NO way to ascertain which is true, except on a wholly subjective, personal level, thus it will never be proven objectively,
since Spirit, by it's very
nature, has absolutely nothing at all to do with the flesh
and whatever seems to be happening on this earth, because Spirit is completely opposite,
and therefore invisible to the naked
human eye, being of the mind only,
and therefore unprovable.
Since the doctrine of sin is the only element known by some of his critics, a common conclusion is that Niebuhr was too pessimistic about
human nature, that he saw only man's sin,
and that he offered no proximate or ultimate hope.
In a sense, Christ provides the grand unifying theory long sought by physicists,
since creation unfolds within the Word's dynamic
and personal assumption of
human nature, «the microcosmos».
Ever
since the quarrel over artificial birth control in the 1960s, wayward Catholic theologians have led the way in dismissing Catholic sexual morality as mere «physicalism», this [dismissal] being an attitude which ignores the dual character of
human nature as a union of body
and soul.
Since the nature and function of literature as I saw it was to acquaint us with the «felt» experience of life, to enlarge our sympathies and, quicken our sensibilities, and since the primary commandment of Christianity was to be disciples of Jesus Christ who had loved God and human beings totally, then the appropriate juncture between Christian faith and literature came at the point of living out our faithful
Since the
nature and function of literature as I saw it was to acquaint us with the «felt» experience of life, to enlarge our sympathies
and, quicken our sensibilities,
and since the primary commandment of Christianity was to be disciples of Jesus Christ who had loved God and human beings totally, then the appropriate juncture between Christian faith and literature came at the point of living out our faithful
since the primary commandment of Christianity was to be disciples of Jesus Christ who had loved God
and human beings totally, then the appropriate juncture between Christian faith
and literature came at the point of living out our faithfulness.
We need a vision whereby the very identity of Christ, in his
human and divine
natures, as the physical
and spiritual centre
and fulfilment of creation, is the basis of his active redemption of us
since sin.
Since in the insecurity arising out of its awareness of its finite freedom, the self tends to absolutise itself
and puts itself in opposition to its own
nature as given by God in Creation
and Redemption, self - alienation is an ever - present aspect of
human reality.
After writing that article,
since I am a philosopher interested in practical reason
and, in any case, a student of
human nature, I wondered what could have made these invitations seem like a good idea to someone.
«Indeed, the reality of the
human being for the entire span of life, both before
and after birth, does not allow us to posit either a change in
nature or a gradation in moral value,
since it possesses full anthropological
and ethical status.
Since the incursion of sin it is also necessary that through the same
human nature of God in his Divine Person, there should be given the perfect vehicle too of reconciliation
and restoration, not only as a fact, but as an ontological work in the real order, in the living order, in its own right» (p. 240)
Unfortunately it thereby undermines the complete
human nature which the Son of God assumed,
since human nature requires both a
human body
and a
human soul.
Nesteruk sums up: theology
and cosmology are correlative,
since theology needs
human persons embodied in the physical universe, whose
nature is explored by cosmology.
If
human experience is genuinely a part of
nature,
and if there be only one type of actual entity within
nature (an idea whose truth - value must finally be verified heuristically), then,
since it is that part of
nature one knows most intimately, it provides the best starting point for finding principles that can be generalized to all actual entities.
But, in the midst of a gentle rain, while these thoughts prevailed, I was suddenly sensible of such sweet
and beneficent society in
Nature, in the very pattering of the drops,
and in every sight
and sound around my house, an infinite
and unaccountable friendliness all at once, like an atmosphere, sustaining me, as made the fancied advantages of
human neighborhood insignificant,
and I have never thought of them
since.
But the shape of the city should not be determined solely by political
and economic concerns,
since the
nature of metropolitan life, our responsibility to the earth,
and the physical
and social conditions necessary for
human flourishing are deeply theological issues.
Human nature is such that when a strong leader becomes convinced of the supreme importance of one teaching or of one strand, he makes that one the most important; and since such definiteness and such focus as act to differentiate certain believers from others are very dear to human nature, one new sect after another is fou
Human nature is such that when a strong leader becomes convinced of the supreme importance of one teaching or of one strand, he makes that one the most important;
and since such definiteness
and such focus as act to differentiate certain believers from others are very dear to
human nature, one new sect after another is fou
human nature, one new sect after another is founded.
God intended equality among men; but «private property, slavery, imperialism, the State itself, appear in post-Fall society as regulations of God to preserve
nature, which is always being disrupted by sin».26 Justice thus appears as the rough, necessary, coerced order of
human societies which is not wholly antithetical to love,
since it serves the purpose of God in the creation
and history.
Along with dualistic mythology several developments in scientific thought
since the seventeenth century have contributed to the exorcism of mind from
nature: first, there is the cosmography of classical (Newtonian) physics picturing our world as composed of inanimate, unconscious bits of «matter» needing only the brute laws of inertia to explain their action; second, the Darwinian theory of evolution with its emphasis on chance, waste
and the apparent «impersonality» of natural selection; third, the laws of thermodynamics (
and particularly the second law) with the allied cosmological interpretation that our universe is running out of energy available to sustain life, evolution
and human consciousness; fourth, the geological
and astronomical disclosure of enormous tracts of apparently lifeless space
and matter in the universe; fifth, the recent suggestions that life may be reducible to an inanimate chemical basis;
and, finally, perhaps most shocking of all, the suspicion that mind may be explained exhaustively in terms of mindless brain chemistry.
This will be given in a way that fits in with man's
nature and through the Incarnation God shows us how: His Son becomes man
and He relates to us through His
human nature,
and this includes the flesh,
since this is an intrinsic part of our ability to relate to others
and also to God.
Martin also asks some telling questions about Rahner's remarkably optimistic vision of
human nature — an optimism all the more astonishing
since, as Martin notes, he spent almost his entire priestly life (1932 — 84) first under Nazi rule
and then, after the Second World War, with half of Germany under Soviet Communism.
Again, the insistence on the societal
nature of the world,
and on man's genuine participation
since he himself is organic to that world, illuminates the Christian belief that man belongs to the creation
and that the whole natural order, as well as
human history
and personal experience, is integral to the purpose of God.
...
Since man enjoys the capacity for a free personal choice in truth... the right to religious freedom should be viewed as innate to the fundamental dignity of every
human person... all people are «impelled by
nature and also bound by our moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth» (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, 2)... let me express my sincere hope that your expertise in the fields of law, political science, sociology
and economics will converge in these days to bring about fresh insights on this important question andthus bear much fruit now
and into the future.
And since the
human mind or soul can not be viewed as part of this machine, it belongs to a supernatural sphere not affected by the laws of
nature.
And since I, along with some famous philosophers and scientists, believe in freedom (not solely of mature human beings but — in some slight degree — of all individuals in nature, down to the atoms and farther), I hold that even in the fetus the incipient individual is unconsciously making what on higher levels we call «decisions.&raq
And since I, along with some famous philosophers
and scientists, believe in freedom (not solely of mature human beings but — in some slight degree — of all individuals in nature, down to the atoms and farther), I hold that even in the fetus the incipient individual is unconsciously making what on higher levels we call «decisions.&raq
and scientists, believe in freedom (not solely of mature
human beings but — in some slight degree — of all individuals in
nature, down to the atoms
and farther), I hold that even in the fetus the incipient individual is unconsciously making what on higher levels we call «decisions.&raq
and farther), I hold that even in the fetus the incipient individual is unconsciously making what on higher levels we call «decisions.»
And this is said pejoratively neither of metaphysics nor of science, since the quest for coherent explanation is intrinsic to the nature and dignity of human reason itse
And this is said pejoratively neither of metaphysics nor of science,
since the quest for coherent explanation is intrinsic to the
nature and dignity of human reason itse
and dignity of
human reason itself.
Beets — the colorful root crop native to the Mediterranean region
and enjoyed by
humans since Roman times — are one of
nature's nutritional powerhouses, delivering nutrients that support a healthy circulatory
and immune system.
N'allah said, «In view of the controversy that this has generated, my advice is that
since we have the Committee on Judiciary,
Human Rights
and Legal Matters, issues of this
nature can be referred to that committee.
Since then he has written eight books on the subject, the most recent being Second
Nature: Brain Science
and Human Knowledge.
Fruit: we
humans think it's the very definition of
nature's bounty,
and ever
since that first forbidden apple fruit has been considered luscious
and desirable.
The dream of flight
and a yearning to explore have been embedded in
human nature since long before the Wright brothers first took wing a hundred years ago.
Humans have influenced
nature since as early as the Ice Age,
and over the past century our impact has become even greater with our many new technologies
and a growing world population.
Using «organic materials as blood, fat, saliva,
and so forth was irrational,» he wrote, «
since Nature herself does not make the metals beneath the earth from
human blood.»
Their method, published ahead of print in the Oct. 17, 2008 online edition of
Nature Biotechnology, not only provides a practical
and simple alternative for the generation of patient -
and disease - specific stem cells, which had been hampered by the low efficiency of the reprogramming process, but also spares patients invasive procedures to collect suitable starting material,
since the process only requires a single
human hair.
• Addressing the
human - specific
nature of antibodies is possible using Organ - Chips that recreate the complexity of
human biology,
since novel antibody targets are not expressed in animals
and therefore require alternatives to current preclinical experimental methods.
They didn't have any knowledge of nutrition, they weren't able to eat nutritious, calorie dense food whenever they wanted due to the absence of agriculture,
and their immune systems were likely weaker than ours (living together in large numbers placed enormous selective pressure on our early agricultural ancestors to develop strong immune systems, keep in mind that early
human civilizations did not have indoor plumbing... so they were sometimes exposed to fecal matter both from fellow
humans and from livestock
and they didn't have the kinds of disinfectants
and anti-biotics we have today,) so for them to have serious health complications makes perfect sense,
nature can be very harsh
and doesn't care how long its been
since your last meal or what your calorie
and micro nutrient needs are... a lot of people died at very young ages back then simply because they got sick
and didn't have proper medical treatment or due to malnutrition or starvation.
Human Nature is presented in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen
and fullscreen versions on the same side of a dual - layer disc; compositionally, it's a toss - up between the two transfers,
since the latter opens up the bottom of the frame whilst cropping the vertical sides.
My, arguably, nonsensical love for animals will surely make me roll my eyes to the snake scene, especially to that, by
nature, lame joke
and if it comes to them or the wolfs I'm pretty sure I'll be on Team Wolfs,
since I don't know personally any of the
human characters.
The cohabitation of wild
and tame animals may defy a law of
nature, but
since Ava's rejection of Archie is hardly the stuff of NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC (Ava thinks Archie lacks machismo), why won't she listen to
human reason?