Sentences with phrase «since impact forces»

Not exact matches

«Since 2008, despite Kodak's best efforts, restructuring costs and recessionary forces have continued to negatively impact the company's liquidity position,» Kodak's chief financial officer, Antoinette P. McCorvey, said in a court filing on Thursday.

They should not trade using seasonal trends alone, since outside market forces can have a major impact.

The 25 year - old has been forced to endure five different loan spells since joining Arsenal back in 2011, but was given a chance to earn a regular role in our side in the 2015 - 16 season, and while the fans enjoyed his impact in the team, Arsene Wenger was seemingly unconvinced.

On second - and - goal from the one with 2:55 left, New England offensive coordinator Charlie Weis called 136 X Cross Z Flag, and a certain moonlighting tight end got chills: Vrabel, with two sacks and a forced fumble, had already made a huge impact, but now he was about to catch his first pass since September 2002.

Cuomo's new push to have the party play a larger role in congressional elections seems to have had some impact on the Democrats» fundraising, but that also underscores the idea that it hasn't been an active force in down - ballot races since he took office.

The total forcing from the trace greenhouse gases mentioned in Step 3, is currently about 2.5 W / m2, and the net forcing (including cooling impacts of aerosols and natural changes) is 1.6 ± 1.0 W / m2 since the pre-industrial.

Running shoes have an in - built cushion that absorbs the impact with each step you take, which is ideal for running but not so great for weightlifting since the latter requires you to use all the force your body produces in order to move as much weight as possible.

Since you are forced to use lighter weights in order to complete this half of the movement, they fail to have greater impact in the top half.

Our reaction: «Hitting lightspeed from its opening sequence and rarely letting up, Solo doesn't have the emotional heft or lingering impact of The Force Awakens, The Last Jedi or, indeed, Rogue One, but it's the most fun entry since A New Hope.

That won't be a difficult task though since it comes with standard safety features like All - Row Side Curtain Airbags, Front and Rear Energy - Absorbing Crumple Zones and Side - Impact Door Beams, Star Safety System ™ (includes Enhanced Vehicle Stability Control, Traction Control, ABS, Electronic Brake - Force Distribution, Brake Assist, Smart Stop Technology ®), Driver Knee Airbag, Front Passenger Seat - Cushion Airbag, LATCH System, Child - Protector Rear Door Locks, Daytime Running Lights, Driver Front Airbag and Front Passenger Advanced Airbag System, Tire Pressure Monitor System, ToyotaCare, Anti-Theft System with Alarm and Engine Immobilizer, and Driver and Front Passenger Seat - Mounted Side Airbags.

And since a great proportion of the dog's body is submerged in water, then the buoyant force of the water can minimize if not eliminate impact forces on the joints of your pooch.

«The Hepworth Wakefield has been a powerful force of energy from the moment it opened in 2011, but it has just kept growing in reach and impact ever since.

He added: «The Hepworth Wakefield was a powerful force of energy from the moment it opened in 2011, but it has just kept growing in reach and impact ever since.»

«The Hepworth Wakefield was a powerful force of energy from the moment it opened in 2011, but it has just kept growing in reach and impact ever since,» Stephen Deuchar, Art Fund director and chair of the judges, said.

«The Hepworth Wakefield has been a powerful force of energy from the moment it opened in 2011, but it has just kept growing in reach and impact ever since,» said Art Fund director Stephen Deuchar.

[1] CO2 absorbs IR, is the main GHG, human emissions are increasing its concentration in the atmosphere, raising temperatures globally; the second GHG, water vapor, exists in equilibrium with water / ice, would precipitate out if not for the CO2, so acts as a feedback; since the oceans cover so much of the planet, water is a large positive feedback; melting snow and ice as the atmosphere warms decreases albedo, another positive feedback, biased toward the poles, which gives larger polar warming than the global average; decreasing the temperature gradient from the equator to the poles is reducing the driving forces for the jetstream; the jetstream's meanders are increasing in amplitude and slowing, just like the lower Missippi River where its driving gradient decreases; the larger slower meanders increase the amplitude and duration of blocking highs, increasing drought and extreme temperatures — and 30,000 + Europeans and 5,000 plus Russians die, and the US corn crop, Russian wheat crop, and Aussie wildland fire protection fails — or extreme rainfall floods the US, France, Pakistan, Thailand (driving up prices for disk drives — hows that for unexpected adverse impacts from AGW?)

The total forcing from the trace greenhouse gases mentioned in Step 3, is currently about 2.5 W / m2, and the net forcing (including cooling impacts of aerosols and natural changes) is 1.6 ± 1.0 W / m2 since the pre-industrial.

Since we can not examine the real world in the absence of forcings (there is always solar variability, volcanic eruptions, orbital forcing and random events like asteriod impacts), it is a valid working hypothesis to assume the models are reasonable.

Since El Nino also has an important impact on the Asian Summer Monsoon in particular, its hard to know precisely what large - scale changes in atmospheric circulation are due to the radiative forcing of the eruption itself, and the secondary response to that eruption of ENSO.

«how can a forcing driven by longwave absorption and emission impact the ocean below since the infrared radiation does not penetrate more than a few micrometers into the ocean?»

However, some have insisted that there is a paradox here — how can a forcing driven by longwave absorption and emission impact the ocean below since the infrared radiation does not penetrate more than a few micrometers into the ocean?

Note that 2xCO2 is the preferred test since the impact of 10 ppmv depends on the base amount of CO2 (i.e. 280 +10 ppmv has a different response that 380 +10 ppmv due to the roughly logarithmic change of forcing with CO2 level).

Since the true impacts of longer term natural variability are not known and the one confidence estimates of aerosol and cloud forcings used to tune the models to that «range of comfort» are quite a bit more uncertain that previously considered, that it might just be time for a do over.

Since BBD is convinced that delayed responses to forcing on the order of 500 years can have no significant impact on «global mean surface temperature», pearls before swine pops into my head.

It is arguably one of the most advanced of the seven in its impacts, with a 2011 GRL report putting its warming effect as equivalent to around 30 % of atmospheric anthro - CO2, and the recent report putting albedo loss from arctic sea - ice decline since»79 as providing a forcing equivalent on average to that from 25 % of the anthro - CO2 levels during the period.

One is that the IPCC forcing central estimate is 40 % larger than that from CO2 alone since 1950 (due to other GHGs and possibly reduced aerosol impacts relative to previous reports), so if you are going to use CO2 alone, you should really add this other 40 % to match what has happened since 1950 and that is what they did.

Spencer's paper may be total bunk, but he is trying to disentangle a portion of cloud impact not directly associated with standard forcing expected, but due to internal variability, «Finally, since much of the temperature variability during 2000 - 2010 was due to ENSO8], we conclude that ENSO - related temperature variations are partly radiatively forced..»

One approach is to estimate global temperature as a simple function of climate forcing and ENSO through a regression approach; perhaps the best - known example is Foster & Rahmstorf (2011), which found that when the impact of natural factors (volcanic eruptions, solar variations, and ENSO) is removed, the trend in global temperature has been remarkably steady since 1979 (when satellite observations of atmospheric temperature begin).

Sensitivity equals dT / dF is only valid for an absolute temperature and absolute forcing over a small range of change and since the current «state of the artistry» «surface temperature average» requires using anomaly from very cold locations with very little energy per degree of anomaly, what «surface» is averaged impacts the estimate of «sensitivity».

This is a very critical omission since knowing the LOSU would surely impact the decisions made by some policymakers since this demonstrates how poor the understanding is for many key climate forcing agents such as albedo and solar events.

IPCC gas told us that since 1750 the net impact of all anthropogenic forcing factors other than CO2 (including aerosols, other GHGs.

These data were used to reconstruct the long - term atmospheric radiative forcing, i.e., climate impact of the peatland since initiation.

Volcanic forcing is more likely the driver of the pseudo-oscillations than just solar and since they, solar and volcanic, have similar frequencies, may be connected, so you can argue that their longer term impact is underestimated and not really natural variability, but there is a «oscillatory» settling pattern.

Since GHG forcing is in terms of energy and guestimated as a temperature impact, you can push the limits of the zeroth law and show some super impressive temperature response that is just about meaningless in terms of «global» impacts.

HadCRUT attributed the «lack of warming» over the past decade (despite CO2 concentrations reaching record levels) to «natural variability» (a.k.a.natural forcing), while IPCC told us in AR4 that the total effect of «natural forcing components» since 1750 was essentially negligible compared to the impact of CO2.

In fact, to claim that recent retreats are man - made, one would have to argue that the natural forces driving glacier retreats since 1794 would have had to halt around 1950, coincidently exactly when man's impact began.

Yet what is more, since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the ne bis in idem principle has become a yardstick of the systemic impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU) on secondary EU law.

Since intoxication affects reaction times, drink driving accidents are often catastrophic, since the driver may not brake or try to minimize the force of the imSince intoxication affects reaction times, drink driving accidents are often catastrophic, since the driver may not brake or try to minimize the force of the imsince the driver may not brake or try to minimize the force of the impact.

The healing force of music has been known since ancient times and studies showed the positive impact of music on mental health problems.