Sentences with phrase «since none of»

My daughter, who just got her Masters, moved back home too since none of her siblings are here (to save moolah).
A couple of commenters even said that they feared the designers were steering her away from her true style, which was kind of funny too since NONE of us on the design team would make those particular choices for themselves, they are all made with and for Hyacinth to showcase her own style.
The day we moved in we were dying to go appliance shopping since none of our appliances worked.
Californians are viewing the most properties on coldwellbanker.com, but residents of the Pacific Northwest must be pretty satisfied with their lifestyle since none of those states made our Top 10 most active list:
The court found that since none of the communications contained a «substantive» legal discussion and also there was no showing by the Association that these communications were kept confidential, these communications were not entitled to protection from any of three doctrines discussed above.
Since none of these studies investigated emotional expressivity as a real - time sequence of dyadic emotions, one explanation for our results might be that the role of parents» and children's individual emotions in child anxiety has been overestimated.
Since none of us are perfect, we aren't able to always do that, but when the trust metric is high, then there is a lot more room for mistakes and the occasional failure, in other words, repair is a lot easier.
Since none of you information is stored on the system please save / print / download your resume and edit file when you are finished or before you move on to the cover letter and / or other creators.
Since none of the three most popular formats really provide a proper vehicle for these new entrants into the employment market, it is important to take a look at some formats that might be of value for those new would - be workers too.
Moreover, it is not possible to operate the device while using S Bike Mode if you're wearing gloves since none of the Galaxy J smartphones feature a Glove mode.
That's doubly frustrating for anyone who already owns a Vive or Rift, since none of the experiences you've already purchased will work until probably late November or even December at the earliest.
And since none of us happen to be carrying around that blue iPhone 7 the rumor sites claimed we would be getting last September, it's not as if every rumor about new iPhone colors always pans out.
Amazon's Alexa devices wouldn't be susceptible to any attack using a botnet since none of them use hard - coded, default passwords.
It's easy to dismiss an LCD screen in our ultra high resolution phones, but since none of the Android Wear watches out there today have figured out how to compete with the sun without draining the teensy little batteries under those tiny screens, LCD offers a distinct advantage over AMOLED displays in direct sunlight.
When purchasing life insurance, it's very important to consider how long we need protection since none of us have a known expiration date.
It's hard to recommend Pillow when there is a free alternative, especially since none of its features are «must haves» (at least in my book).
Since none of us knows how healthy we will be tomorrow, it makes sense to purchase what mortgage protection you can afford now.
I am certainly open to being convinced otherwise, but I agree that since none of us is an 18th century revolutionary, analogies to Thomas Paine or James Madison are not especially helpful.
Since none of them are on speaking terms and all of the agreements we could potentially arrive at could have drastically different terms, it feels like the right way to go about this is to create a separate addendum for each tenant.
Oh, and since none of the lawyers above have claimed their profiles, Holder's 9.4 is obviously way more significant than my 10.
Or so they thought, since none of them really knew what they would need to know in practice.
-- Finally, the condition is necessary, since none of the less restrictive alternatives provided by the instruments of mutual recognition (such as the Framework Decision 2002 / 584 / JHA on the European Arrest Warrant (FD EAW) or Framework Decision 2008 / 909 / JHA on the mutual recognition of custodial sentences for their cross-border enforcement) could be «equally effective» in ensuring the aim of preventing impunity.
Since none of these enforcement conditions are mentioned by Article 50 CFREU, the question arose, when the CFREU became a source of primary EU law, whether those limiting conditions in the CISA are compatible with the CFREU, taking into account that the CFREU is a lex superior and posterior.
For your analogy to hold, you are arguing that a hypothetical Star Trek near - instantaneous scanning will take place on the complete assembled structure, of complete depth at a very fine resolution No, only for the things that are relevant, which for a star or the Sun are only its mass, composition, and age [and to second order if it is part of a binary star or has giant nearby planets — but since none of those things apply to the Sun we can ignore them].
Since none of the 45 potential tenants are media companies, the structure may be demolished, even though it cost # 330M.
None of the real or alleged errors are in this book, since none of those contentious statements plucked from the thousands of pages appeared to be «main findings» that needed to be discussed in a 250 - page summary.
Doubting basic results of climate science based on the recent claims against the IPCC is particularly ironic since none of the real or supposed errors being discussed are even in the Working Group 1 report, where the climate science basis is laid out.
And since none of this has any relevance to climate science or denialism, I guess the implication is that Huet is picking on Allegre's book as part of some kind of Marxist sectarian feud.
This is a pointless exercise for iRF efficacies, since none of the studies use iRF values.
And that's certainly the case now, since none of the climate models are able to tell us what the future is going to be.
But, since none of the models is responding fast enough and the reality lies outside the bounds of the models, this won't work.
al.'s political views (or Crick's views on aliens), then I would still vote for the good Doctor, especially since none of Dr. Paul's opponents can even approach Haldane, etc. in the area of scientific literacy.
And since none of the winners is going to be exact — indeed, for decades and decades of work, none of the winners was even particularly close to observed / measured spectra in spite of using supercomputers (admittedly, supercomputers that were slower than your cell phone is today) to do the computations — one would then return to the drawing board and code entry console to try to do better.
The logical fallacy comes in when you realize that none of the astronauts are qualified to be authorities on climate modeling, since none of the ones you showed have likely ever performed climate modeling.
Since none of it is anthropogenic it is clear that AGW does not exist, predictions of a global warming catastrophe are totally wrong, and policies adapted for emission control are a criminal waste of public resources.
Are you then to conclude that since none of the other stars show planets at low resolution, that there are no planets around them?
Since none of us own this blog (it's Dr. Curry's sole property last I knew)... so long as we don't run afoul of her codes of conduct it would seem that we're pretty much free to discuss whatever the hell topics we want.
If you count papers which don't address the issue at all you could bring in hundreds of thousands of papers on quantum physics, stellar cartography, economics, sociiology, et cetera and claim that since none of these take any position on global warming there is less than 1 % support for it... or any other subject you want to dismiss via blatantly flawed logic.
Logically, when water vapor is added the initial «sensitivity» is positive since none of the phenomena associated with negative feedbacks from water vapor would exist.
Since none of these are «compressable» I suspect some kind of «shunting» effect, however small, propagating in a spiral from the centre towards periphery.
Since none of these countries have fully resolved the carbon rights issue, the debate is ongoing.
----------------------------------- Sounds to me like we «Europeans» (I use the phrase through gritted teeth, since none of us — in the UK anyway — voted for this situation, but I digress), we Europeans will absorb the losses of the CCX by increased carbon «levies» to the undemocratic EU authority.
The data we've gathered, showing that the sun rose on days N - 1, N - 2, N - 3, etc. might be grist to my Bayesian mill, but are useless for testing the hypothesis, since none of the data can falsify it — the hypothesis remains untested until day N dawns (or doesn't).
(Equally the AOGCMs are not compatible with these satellite - based observations, since none of them manage to simulate or account for this increase in net received shortwave over this key period.)
Since none of this matters I'm sure it would be acceptable to you.
Someone, that is to say, among these «approaches» might challenge the existence of what allegedly is being approached, they might say «This Truth is a myth and since none of you have this Truth, none of you can prove otherwise — it is an illusion.»
That is not a solution since none of the cycles are constant, but an interesting possibility.
But since none of us will be around in 2100 to see if the forecast extrapolation to 2100 is correct, we will only be able to check the forecasted extrapolated trend line.
Since none of the four models considered by the Mediterranean study consistently out - performed the others in simulating present - day climate, the researchers combined their results to produce a single composite scenario for each climate variable.2 To prevent the GCM with the greatest sensitivity from dominating the scenarios, they first had to standardise the model results.
Although in comparison to Artel's My Poland, Agu's and Martínez's Aesthetics of Repair might seem less radical, since none of the exhibited artworks by the twelve participating artists is particularly shocking.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z