«Because 85 percent of people in the study reported extending the antenna during calls, we might have expected to find a disproportionate cluster of tumors behind the eye and the ear on the side the cell phone was used
since radiation emission is highest at the antenna,» says co-author Mark Malkin, a neuro - oncologist at Memorial Sloan - Kettering Cancer Center.
Not exact matches
Many suspect crops in industrialized Western countries have been getting more light
since the 1980s thanks to clean air regulations that brought down
emissions of aerosols, which scatter and absorb solar
radiation.
A major problem with the idea of making VR32 wearable, according to Makino, was that Nintendo engineers were concerned about placing a chip with high radio
emissions near a user's head,
since the safety of EMF
radiation on the brain had yet to be thoroughly studied.
«how can a forcing driven by longwave absorption and
emission impact the ocean below
since the infrared
radiation does not penetrate more than a few micrometers into the ocean?»
However, some have insisted that there is a paradox here — how can a forcing driven by longwave absorption and
emission impact the ocean below
since the infrared
radiation does not penetrate more than a few micrometers into the ocean?
Further, translating regional sulfate
emission into global forcing isnt really appropriate,
since atmospheric sulfate has too short of an atmospheric lifetime (owing to cloud and rain processes) to influence the global
radiation balance.
AGW is a hypothesis that makes sense, namely: — GHGs absorb outgoing
radiation, thereby contributing to warming (GH theory)-- CO2 is a GHG (as is water vapor plus some minor GHGs)-- CO2 concentrations have risen (mostly
since measurements started in Mauna Loa in 1959)-- global temperature has risen
since 1850 (in ~ 30 - year warming cycles with ~ 30 - year cycles of slight cooling in between)-- humans emit CO2 and other GHGs — ergo, human GHG
emissions have very likely been a major contributor to higher GHG concentrations, very likely contributing to the observed warming
Since doubling the concentration of CO2 will halve the average height of
emission, there is at most 0.5 W / m ^ 2 increase in back
radiation from this cause.
Without the heat flow from the surface there would be no back
radiation since it is the upward
radiation, convection and heat conduction that are responsible for the heating of the atmosphere which, in turn, results in the
emission of
radiation by atmosphere.
The one certainty about climate over the past 31 years is that there has been no enhanced greenhouse effect from GHG
emissions as claimed by the IPCC
Since 1979 satellite measurements of outgoing longwave
radiation have not shown any decreasi in OLR from the increased insulation ascroibed to the enhanced greenhouse effect resulting from the increase in GHG
emissions.