Sentences with phrase «since there»

Since there is no god, there was no god guiding the development of any religion.

When you guys get together, do you sit around and stare since there's really nothing to talk about religion-wise, because, well, God doesn't exist?

This view claims that since there can be no one true interpretation of anything, including an historical interpretation of Jesus, and since laypeople are in no position to argue with the experts, «they should suspend belief among all kinds of expert interpretations, including religiously inspired ones.»

But since believers of the bible call it «truth» without ANY supporting evidence, my assertion about nutters being mentally ill is even «more true» since there is at least some tangible evidence.

The book has obviously resonated with a great many people since there is a real life Church of All Worlds inspired by it, even if I never grokked the fullness of their devotion to a sci - fi novel.

The educational radical thinks that since there is no natural canon the best society is an unregulated one, and that the design of an undergraduate curriculum should therefore be the responsibility of each individual student.

Since there isn't any proof that it didn't happen it must be true.

Since there still is about 5 % of people who do not share the production of oxytocin in the brain, which has been called the empathy chemical, on stimulus which means they would feel nothing after stealing a childs candy because they are chemically unable to relate to the child and all they can think about is that they now have the candy.

Since there are advantages to competition, as well as to not having all of one's eggs in one basket, one company should not manage all of these ventures.

So, since there is probably not a chance that these kids, one a infant and one a toddler, could escape a sinking Mazda and swim to safety... when I know that you and me, if our moms did the same thing probably could...

sorry bud, but it's your preterism falls flat... in one place in Rev it says satan was chained and thrown into hell... I asked a preterist believing fellow about that since there is such incredible evil in the world, and he had the nerve to explain, «well, ya got ta understand, satan is on a looo — onng chain!»

Since there isn't a shred of evidence there is a creator, basing morality on anything other than the best interest of society is ridiculous beyond compare.

Since there is just as much evidence of that as there is for your afterlife hypothesis, all you really have is speculation once someone or some life form dies.

«Since there is no empirical way to show that one host is consecrated while another is not — consecrated hosts do not glow in the dark — there is also no way for anyone but the organizers to know whether a host used in a black mass has been consecrated or not,» Clooney said.

If God gave «evidence» then we likely wouldn't be having this discussion since there likely wouldn't be any atheists.

Also since there are 7,000,000,000 people on earth (and will be 9,000,000,000 by 2050) and VERY FEW of them cam live > 80 THEN more than 8,750,000 will expire every year regardless of cause.

On the other hand, an intelligent deity should accept the «I don't follow any of them since there was no proof» argument.

It would have made no difference since there were no patriarchs to ride said camels even if they existed.

And since there was writing in the book and has been defiled, is there a proper rite / ritual for destroying the book?

He fails to realize that views based on evidence, however amazing they might be, are not crazy since there is a reason to have those views.

Anyone who dies and is buried becomes worm food ONLY... but not this so called Jesus since there is no empirical evidence that thiis person ever existed.

Since there is only one legal marriage contract on the government books in this family with the rest of the marriages being only spiritual cermonies to bind them each to one another, and there was no duplicity involved on the husband's part, I see no reason why they can not live the lifestyle they have freely chosen as consenting adults.

Not being able to disprove evolution does not mean you have faith in it, since there is an overwhelming amount of evidence that shows the viability of evolution as an explanation for the lives we live now.

It's also reasonable to keep those two notions distinct considering what might be viewed as a political push to add credibility to Paul's writings about the miraculous since there was little there beyond hearsay.

I guess its not their fault, perhaps atheists have a deeper understanding of evolution since there ancestors are apes and Christians well, are built in the image of God.

made Since there is only evidence that men made your bible, complete with many, many flaws, it is far more likely that your book is part of the deception of men, than any gods having anything to do with it.

They almost universally agree, since there is little to argue about.

We may do it again, but we are free from condemnation since there is a way to be forgiven.

If it is only the one god, then I must point out that you, too, don't believe, since there are thousands of gods in whom you could believe but do not.

Gods, fairies, ghosts and leprechauns are things you believe in since there is no evidence to accept.

In the end all you are doing is just relying on your own belief because even though there is no proof that that there actually is no deity who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop our faith in said deity, since there is thus far no irrefutable proof that there is such a deity, that you then come to a conclusion that there is no such deity, all you are doing is just relying on belief just like I'm relying on belief and that what it really boils down to is just that it is all a matter of belief.

Yes the christians have been persecuting everyone since there have been christians, so you are correct there.

Since there is no proof of any god, you have to wonder if this guy is sane or just using the blind faith of believers like yourself to gain power.

Personally since there are people who are offended by the current monument, what do you think would be an appropriate monument for the World Trade Center?

when there is not female counter part... and why would a being that has no food need a p3n1s since there is not water in space for him to drink... without an atmosphere he would not have ears..

It is not up to Atheists to prove there is no God since there is no proof that God exists in the first place.

Since there is no way you can know the mind of every atheist, all you have are your silly little made up tales.

austin that is not true since there is no evidence of a spirit or soul or whatever please speak in terms of reality with factual information from now on thanks he asked for an honest response not a made up response

I hope they do nt do a YourTake on the next one, since there are no comments and it says comments closed.

If so, then according to you, we should be living in anarchy, since there is always someone to brak a law, thereby rendering all laws useless.

Since there's ample evidence that their general levels of knowledge about current — let alone....

Questions about purpose become meaningless since there is no longer an intelligence or guiding hand giving inherent meaning to anything that occurs in nature.

The theory of Evolution is more of a fact but since there is still some that we don't know, it is still a theory but the most supported theory (that and the theory of relativity)

Why yes and since there is a higher incident of sx abuse in families we should castrate all males in families and while we are at ti to be a coach or a school teacher they should all be castrated as well since a significant number of coaches and teachers molest.

Since there isn't a single shred of evidence for your god, you've got nothing.

since there are infinite non provable explanations (like religion) and only one alternative, they are not equal.

I suppose that we couldn't expect much more, since there is little incentive not to lie without fear of God... barring faith in some truly man - made myths that I'm sure this group is willing to offer.

Since there is a SUPERNATURALIST explanation, then we have evidence that supports that choice.

Science just defaults to no belief in god since there's no evidence or reason to think there is a god.

And since there is only flesh, then there is no need to be religious.