Sentences with phrase «sinful if»

would be practically sinful if not for the mighty Gugino...

Some people, if they are unfamiliar with the Bible, might ask why we are sinful if a holy God made us.

All things can be sinful if they take over our lives and it becomes our God, that can be sex, drugs, gambling, video games, friends, money, etc..

Wouldn't it be sinful if they still owe their credit card company money?

John, you wrote: «Forming a whip and driving people away is a clear example that inflicting pain and violence can be performed without necessarily being sinful if it is done to stop a sinful behavior, though it does not show that going as far as killing someone is acceptable.»

Forming a whip and driving people away is a clear example that inflicting pain and violence can be performed without necessarily being sinful if it is done to stop a sinful behavior, though it does not show that going as far as killing someone is acceptable.

To him, even eating was sinful if done in a spirit of pleasure.6 The only enjoyment Augustine allowed for was the enjoyment of God.

And again... keep on believing that homosexuality is sinful if you want, I don't care, but don't take the extreme and use that to condemn all homosexuals.

Not exact matches

(For instance I'm fairly confident that promiscuity is sinful, especially when it comes from a place of lust, but I'm less convinced that my committed same - sex friends are sinning by expressing their love physically any more than I am sinning when my wife and I express our love physically — even though I think we can be if we are acting out of lust or as a means of asserting power over one another, but that is another story).

If he rules, your sinful body will not prevail, and once you will be happy to get released from the body.

By the way Scott, if you read the Bible you will see that social problems will never be solved, because man is sinful, and can not fix the world.

well do it already leave this sinful earth to the man following no believers if heaven is so great

Largely I would echo what Christine has already said about the way in which we feel accepted within our community, but if you'll bear with me for a little bit, I'd like to attempt to explain to Trey in particular what I see as the difference between this type of acceptance and the attitude of the many Christians who view homosexuality as sinful such as what you have encountered with your sister.

So, if we (along with many theologians) don't see the love we share with our partner to have been decreed sinful by God, then how are we playing God by saying it is ok?

Even if you do think it's sinful and wrong... that's just not the way to go about it.

Shall the church welcome them only if they attend workshops that teach them of their sinful brokenness and their need to return to single - hood?

If (and when) I believed that, I doubt I could have accepted having someone in ministry in my congregation that I believed was living a lie, accepting something sinful as a central part of their lives and identity.

Kim T, can you offer any explanation for my lust, and for why God never gave me any relief from it, if it was sinful?

So if Jesus can do that then why do we restrict participation for things that you and I can agree are not sinful?

It's up to the individual how they hat is sinful or not and only God can determine if it is, not the Pope.

Substantially, Gahl says: In the moment in which the penitent confesses a behavior that constitutes gravely sinful matter, committed without full consciousness and deliberate consent, the confessor will explain to him the doctrine of the Church regarding his particular problem and will refuse to impart absolution if the penitent will not commit himself in the future to avoid that behavior.

And He, if we trust Him, places His light within us, creating this fight between our sinful nature and His holy character.

If anything you fit the definition of a sinner as given by your buybull... you are a hypocrite who judges people and your god says judging is sinful.

If someone is sinful today, it was sinful 2,000 years ago.

If you doubt that, just look at the startling speed with which ho.mose.xuality has gone from a crime worthy of committal into a psychiatric ward to being accepted, and now so - called ho.mose.xual marriage is now being legalized, and the outcasts of society are now the ones who still disaprove of this as being sinful.

And if something was a sin 2,000 years ago, it's still sinful now.

Kierkegaard was saying that if a philosophy bears a message fit to assist in building the Kingdom of God, then something in that message will hurt the heads or abrade the sensitivities of ordinarily sinful people» folks like us.

If we follow our sinful flesh and live according to its rules, we are trapped by the gates of hell.

It would just collapse if everyone were so sinful.

If the drawing that I am feeling is leading me to the conclusion that my life is sinful and I have no hope in God, then this is not the conviction of the Holy Spirit; it is the temptation of the devil who is trying to get me to distrust God» love and faithfulness.

I regret my sinful past and if I could have had the knowledge I have now I would have resisted more and lean't on God for His strength to overcome those temptations!

But if this is what you're saying constitutes anything «from my own studies of online evidences then and now»... We are as the Body of Christ laying not just sinful accusations at a brother's feet, but criminal ones.

They do this of course to support their belief that homosexuality is an inherently sinful behavior and if an individual is born with such a condition it would seem to imply some sort of endorsement by God.

So then if we prove that there is a genetic reason why people are born with same sex attraction, it would not be sinful... just the result of our fallen state?

If a homosexual person is so made that an intimate loving relationship is possible only with a member of the same sex, on what basis can this experience of love be declared sinful?

So if I understand you correctly you are declaring something sinful which scripture does not... you sidestep the request to prove your assertion... and yet you accuse me of not being able prove my position.

So, the only question that really needs to be answered when asking if a particular act is sinful is whether or not God says that it is sinful or not.

If science does prove that homosexuality is genetic or that there strictly a biological cause and people are indeed born that way, it does not in any way suggest that it is not sinful or that God created them that way.

EP: So there is a good chance that if you go to this party, you will fall back into your old sinful habits, and will end up doing the same things you did before.

If we believe something is sinful, we simply shouldn't do it.

In such a view, the protagonist's at times harsh reaction to various sinners, e.g., Filippo Argenti (canto VIII), Pope Nicholas III (canto XIX), Bocca degli Abati (canto XXXII), is not (even if it seems so to some contemporary readers) a sign of his falling into sinful attitudes himself, but proof of his righteous indignation as he learns to hate sin.

http://alcoholism.about.com/cs/genetics/a/aa990517.htm That is all simply to say that even if homosexuality is proven to have absolutely nothing to do with choice, there will still be grounds for Christians to classify it as sinful.

If it is neglected, the whole community is sinful, but if one person performs the prayer, the community is considered to have performed its dutIf it is neglected, the whole community is sinful, but if one person performs the prayer, the community is considered to have performed its dutif one person performs the prayer, the community is considered to have performed its duty.

And, at the same time, to be fair, what you may perceive as a «Love Story by God» and take it «literally» others perceive it at best, a book of fiction, with some good words of wisdom now and then, to at worst, a book of an insane deity who demands obedience, among other ridiculous things, and... sent «himself» to die for «us» as we are «broken» and «flawed» / sinful» creations, and by sending his - self... if... we just «believe» we go to eternal paradise with him.

If these sinful creature knew what was good for them, they would drop to the ground trembling and beg for His mercy and love!

It's not sinful behavior if the gay couple is married before your god moron, that the point.

But if you use your free will to come in line with God's will, then it's not sinful.

Christian politicians (if there are any left) should not support any person, group, agenda or movement that promotes a sinful lifestyle, because quite frankly every sinful lifestyle leads to things not beneficial to society (crime, violence, scams, breakdown of the family, etc.).

Or what about if we keep sinning over and over and just can not break a bad sinful habit?

I've always been so afraid of their arguments... and now I wonder more and more if that was because I knew that in my «heart of hearts» I was inclined to believe them, which was sinful and bad and a one - way ticket to hell....