Sentences with phrase «single decision in the case»

Not exact matches

In the eyes of the tribunal, though, the case hinged on one glaring problem: nobody at Tim Hortons» head office in Oakville, Ont., could remember exactly when the decision was made to fire Ko - Csonka, and not a single document disclosed during the proceedings shed any light on the answeIn the eyes of the tribunal, though, the case hinged on one glaring problem: nobody at Tim Hortons» head office in Oakville, Ont., could remember exactly when the decision was made to fire Ko - Csonka, and not a single document disclosed during the proceedings shed any light on the answein Oakville, Ont., could remember exactly when the decision was made to fire Ko - Csonka, and not a single document disclosed during the proceedings shed any light on the answer.

So I speak as someone who has struggled with, and in some cases regretted, her decisions at the ballot box, and who recognizes no single political party boasts a consistent pro-life ethic, just as no single political party embodies the teachings of Jesus or the values of his Kingdom.

Although the majority of placements involve single women, in some cases the child's father may also be actively involved in the decision - making process.

a lack of «deliberation» in decision - making, in other words decisions usually made in haste by a single person or small group (all 12 cases)-- this is also often linked to the development of «group - think» in the decision - making coterie (8 cases).

Last year he singled out planning judicial review by saying cases must be brought within six weeks of any decision rather than the usual three months, knowing it is harder for small community groups to raise money and start complex proceedings in this short space of time.

«We think single - cell analysis could potentially augment traditional biopsy - core histopathology, significantly improving risk assessment and informing treatment decisions, especially in borderline cases.»

The decision will include whether there is a need for a personal budget from one or more of the available budgets: education, health or social care (or in some cases form a single pooled «support» budget).

Prior to these changes, educators lived in a vague legal world, at the mercy of a Supreme Court decision (the 1996 Virginia Military Institute [VMI] case, United States v. Virginia), which required an «exceedingly persuasive justification» of anyone wanting to set up single - sex schools or classes.

In my case, what influenced my decision to join Select is the fact that I'd rather spend my limited time and resources on a single marketplace than risk spreading too thin.

On their own, doji are not much help in making sound, high probability trading decisions — as is the case with any single indicator.

In that case every single decision that every single human has ever made throughout their entire life for all recorded history, on the basis of the assumption that there is a God, or Gods, or Gods and Saints and Devils or an entire supernatural pantheon with its own history at war and involving humans in their intrigues, has had a pretty glaring false premise at its very rooIn that case every single decision that every single human has ever made throughout their entire life for all recorded history, on the basis of the assumption that there is a God, or Gods, or Gods and Saints and Devils or an entire supernatural pantheon with its own history at war and involving humans in their intrigues, has had a pretty glaring false premise at its very rooin their intrigues, has had a pretty glaring false premise at its very root.

Artificial changes due government coercive power exercised on the Fair Market to favor a single industry or private party are always in some sense anti-democratic (in that they influence the individual decision - making of buyers and sellers); a narrower case where the change harms a single industry or private group is less anti-democratic but still interference.

At times, people have questioned whether in at least some cases, parties should be able to appeal prothonotary decisions directly to the Federal Court of Appeal, rather than first to a single judge of the Federal Court.

The claimant won every single legal point germane to his primary case, but by the application of the «policy» point borrowed from the House of Lords» decisions in McFarlane and Rees — that a healthy child is a blessing rather than a detriment — the decision has conferred upon the IVF clinic effective impunity from the normal consequences of their breach of contract.

Work highlights Appeared in the Supreme Court for Life Technologies to reverse a Federal Circuit decision in a patent infringement case, successfully arguing that the supply of a single component of a multicomponent patented invention for manufacture abroad does not give rise to liability under the Patent Act.

In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions on both jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result»In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions on both jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result»in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».

Further, a single Commissioner is, in many cases, the ultimate decision maker regarding an applicant's case.

Based on the decisions in these two cases «where a condominium corporation's governing documents state that units are to be occupied by a single family, but no definition of that term is provided, «family» means «a social unit consisting of parent (s) and their children, whether natural or adopted, and that includes other relatives if living with the primary group.»

The Court held that it was not necessary for the appellant to show that every female prisoner required to live at an AP has suffered the detriment of being placed at an AP far from her home in order to establish a case of direct discrimination on grounds of sex, and considered that the risk of being placed far from home is much greater for women than for men due to the smaller numbers of female offenders, and the policy decision that the particular vulnerability of women required to live in an AP means that all APs should be single sex.

Raymond Hill's article in the Bloomberg BNA Viewpoint series examines the Court of Justice's line of case law on single / multiple supplies following on from the Tellmer decision — and particularly the recent judgment in Wojskowa.

They are careful to distance themselves from a full return to the pragmatic and functional approach by stating that a full contextual standard of review analysis need not be conducted in every single case, however there isn't much context left unturned in their analysis here regarding this question and this decision maker, and for the most part Justices Côté and Brown only pay lip service to the Dunsmuir approach.

It's quite striking to me, for example, that in a Term that included Wal - Mart, Concepcion, al - Kidd, Bennett, Winn, and a host of other cases (i.e., the October 2010 Term), Justice Stevens singled out VOPA v. Stewart in the book's Epilogue as perhaps the most significant decision the Court handed down last year.

Liberty Mutual has a near - instant turnaround time, and in most cases, applicants can expect an underwriting decision after a single phone call.

I believe it's obvious that the decision in this case will affect every single real estate board in Canada.