Sentences with phrase «single question do»

And what single question do atheists in general have the most difficult time addressing?

What single question do atheists in general have the most difficult time addressing?

Just because I don't know the answer to every single question doesn't mean that I'm using «circular reasoning.»

Not exact matches

Without question, the single greatest struggle for me has been learning how to delegate effectively and trusting those around me to do the job right.

He ended each carefully mapped day by asking one single question, «What good did I do today?»

The question quickly becomes, «Do I want to pay nearly $ 400 to play a single game?»

First of all, if asked even a simple question, you don't want to give a single word answer (yes or no).

«That's the single best piece of advice: Constantly think about how you could be doing things better and questioning yourself,» he has said.

LUSARDI: Question three has to do about risk diversification: «Do you think the following statement is true or false: buying a single company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.&raqudo about risk diversification: «Do you think the following statement is true or false: buying a single company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.&raquDo you think the following statement is true or false: buying a single company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.»

I have no question that these conditions will emerge over the completion of the current market cycle, and - despite the truncated bullish shift and awkward transition that followed my 2009 stress - testing decision - there is not a single market cycle in 30 years as a professional investor where those same conditions did not provoke me to adopt a constructive outlook.

Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.

In a conference call with top Apple executives, including Timothy D. Cook, the chief operating officer, who will be running the company during Mr. Jobs's absence, analysts did not ask a single question about Mr. Jobs's health.

But I can teach the single most important question a project manager must ask: What does success look like?

The single most important question you can answer as a business leader, marketing or sales executive is, «Who do we want to be a hero to?»

This response does not answer the question of why the entire economy would be affected by a single suit, an idea bordering on the preposterous.

In a more perfect House of Commons, such a backbencher — and this is not to single Mr. Toet out, only to use him as a convenient example — would be in the House during Question Period to do two things: represent his constituents and hold the government to account.

It is not just a guide to Merkur per se but does provided all the information on their offerings that anyone with questions or researching would want to have as a single point of reference.

It's a label that describes a single position on a single question — do you believe in a god or gods?

The mere fact that you would say something like that shows that you A) have never even questioned your faith (which is a bad thing), and B) don't know a single atheist.

Those doubts often took he form of a single question in my mind: «Did Anne Frank go to hell?»

, though again this is more protest than question, for we know we haven't done anything monstrous enough to deserve to be singled out for this kind of horrible punishment.

«So, returning to the question as to why I am single, there is no simple, easy answer; but I do believe that, in part, it is because I am a woman and a leader and didn't marry before it became apparent that I was not a behind - the - scenes leader but an up - front, out - loud, follow - me one.»

We may call pursuit of each type of question a different type of theological inquiry as long as that does not suggest either that they are like links or successive moments in a single extended inquiry or that they are somehow variations or aspects of some postulated «theology as such.»

Her answers to my series of questions were both astonishing and revealing: She confirmed for me that her academic team did not speak to a single patient, medical analyst, associate, or worker of Mother Teresa's before writing their paper against her; nor did they examine how all her finances were spent; nor did they speak with anyone at the Vatican involved with her sainthood cause, or consult the Vatican's medical board which certified the miracle attributed to Blessed Teresa.

Not sure I'd like to single out one person as the «father» of the theory, but whoever it may be (I'd say Lemaitre, if I had to choose), science doesn't work on the basis of leaders and followers, so your question makes no sense.

Topher, «atheism» describes people who do not believe a SINGLE question.

of the commentary here is based on the assumption that there is a single true, correct answer to the question, «Does God exist, and if so, what is the nature of God?»

At this question every single God loving christian will hide behind their «Faith» but Faith does not excuse, nor is it synonymous with, ignorance.

There's plenty of room to interpret and disagree, but being / not being a Christian devolves to how each of us answers a single question — one posed by Jesus to his own apostles: «Who do you say I am?»

To do so, they will examine each of the areas of a local church's life from the perspective of a single, guiding question: How can this area of the life of a church make the maximum contribution to the spiritual health and growth of persons?

Are you just unable to comprehend that atheism is a single stance on a single issue, and your question does not make ANY sense?

«When it comes to those questions on the border - line of the unknowable, all the accumulated knowledge of twenty — five centuries has done no more than feed the argument, without advancing us a single step towards the solution.»

My contention is, however, that if the unity of the occasion does not reside in its standpoint, then a single region may be included in the standpoints of more than one occasion without affecting the discrete individuality of the occasions in question.

When the question is one about the education of the ministry it will not do to ignore either the general — the theological — nor the particular — the educational — approach; the theologian as educator or the educator as theologian can not carry on his theological and his educational critiques separately and independently, nor can he reduce them to one inquiry with one method in the hope of gaining one single answer.

My question is: why should it not be our task to find a single interpretation of the texts if that is exactly what Whitehead explicitly encourages us to do?

Though the Imam did a good job at remaining calm and pretty much defending himself from her single track minded questions, her manner took away from the whole thing.

You didn't answer a single one of my questions.

This post affects 200 students... My question is how does the Vatican handle this issue in the EU or other nations with single payer provisions and are non-secular by definition?

«He did not let a single legal question lapse,» said Zhang Peihong, a lawyer who worked with Zhang, according to Chinachange.org.

When I was 25 I could tell you why God allows suffering and how, on that final day, God will deal with those who have never heard of Jesus; and I didn't have one single question about hell.

There is then the question about how to deal with education when the larger community does not share a single commitment.

... Besides, the development of the mind on one single plane... there is the movement of the mind which goes from one plane to another, deeper down... As to knowing how they work, this is a question which does not only concern psychology; it is part of the general and metaphysical problem of causality.

She is sure to say, «I'm sorry, I don't know that,» and then I can intone «Hey Google» into the phone and pose the question or just spin around, sit in the chair, and do a Google search without saying a single word) roasted to hell and back with several careless wrist - shakes of black pepper, salt, garlic powder, sweet smoked paprika, red pepper flakes, and a touch of nutritional yeast (which I will never call «nooch» even if you put a gun to my temple and tell me that pulling the trigger will not yield a little flag emblazoned with the word «Bang!»).

But I did want to address the fact that your question singled out kcals and carbs for concern — which is a topic that I often write about, and my readers often ask about.

It's true I have always been guilty of blaming the refs for every single loss since the Issel / English days and I'll admit that it's probably the nature of the game as it's not an easy game to officiate at all, but at least now somebody will ask the question of why did you make that call?

i remember after the first Diaz fight, he was also talking about various things to answer a single question, as if he wanted to divert attention away from the obvious so he doesn't have to face them head - on.

Where I have the problem is other teams do have exciting young talent and those teams don't get the same credit that your team's talent with question marks has been getting this year but also well before this year It's because the Sixers are thought to have the best young talent, Simmons / Embiid are viewed as the best young duo in the nba (http://www.nba.com/article/2017/11/01/blogtable-dynamic-young-duos-jokic-murray-simmons-embiid-towns-wiggins-brown), it's hard to get a single generational player, many believe the Sixers have TWO.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

To be, after every single defeat, despite the consistency that we have put into our work at the highest level, questioned about everything that has been done.

There is no logic in questioning whether or not Giroud can lead us to a title as a striker because no single striker anywhere can do that.