As to the second stage,
the single standard of reasonableness is similarly impractical.
When conflict occurs, it must be resolved by reference to some factors external to the categorical approach.The new,
single standard of reasonableness is similarly unworkable without reference to external factors.
Not exact matches
In Wilson v Atomic Energy
of Canada Ltd., [12] Abella J raised the option
of engaging in future reform: the adoption
of a
single reviewing
standard of reasonableness.
Most assuredly, Dunsmuir made a herculean effort to simplify the doctrine
of administrative deference by providing a two - step framework for identifying the proper review
standard and by reducing the number
of deferential
standards to a
single standard of «
reasonableness.»
Of course everything could be done under a
single reasonableness standard.