Not exact matches
I am open to seeing sourcing on the subject and think it would be interesting, but spouting off a
single man's opinion is not
verifiable fact when others have stated against such truths.
because you don't have a
single fact to back up your claims whereas science is demonstrably getting closer to the answer with
verifiable, objective and independent
facts.
Care to take issue with one
single statement I've made with
verifiable and accurate
facts... rather than playing the» Trump» with preadolescent and ineffective insults my little FCA shill?