It's never happened in
a single weight loss study in over 100 years.
Not exact matches
Our use of observational data reflects the existing literature on lactation and maternal health; apart from a
single randomized trial examining the effect of exclusive lactation duration on maternal
weight loss, 48 there are no published
studies of maternal health outcomes in randomized trials of breastfeeding.
The
study also tested whether 3
single - nucleotide polymorphism multilocus genotype responsiveness patterns or insulin secretion (INS - 30; blood concentration of insulin 30 minutes after a glucose challenge) were associated with
weight loss.
2 - Artificial Sweeteners — after almost 50 years of artificial sweeteners in the food chain, not a
single peer - reviewed scientific
study has shown any correlation between the use of such nasty tasting stuff and long - term
weight loss.
Finally, with the exception of a
single study, there is no evidence that
weight loss on hypo - energetic regimens is altered by meal frequency.
This is why every
single controlled
weight loss study conducted in the last 100 years... including countless meta - analyses and systematic reviews... have concluded that meaningful
weight loss requires energy expenditure to exceed energy intake.
Resistant Starch roundup: Type II: Hi - maize 260 (raw potato or green banana)(Bodinham's insulin [hyper] secretion
study, MacNeil's Subway
study, and Raben & Noakes) Type III: Novelose 330 (cooked then cooled potato)(Lobley's 3 - week high protein
weight loss study) Type IV: Pharmaceutical - grade potato starch (Haub's
single - dose GTT)
But every
single study of reducing calorie intake shows no benefit in
weight loss.