Sentences with phrase «site on climate change science»

Not exact matches

has increased its direct contact with the wider public through beefed up social media initiatives, a new email newsletter on trending topics on its site, and improved portals to spotlight important areas such as climate change, marine science, and cancer research.

This post is exactly why this site is so popular for lay - people: it provides a clear explanation of climate change science and informed debate on current topics.

As a lay person (albeit with a Science degree) I find it interesting that the last 7 posts on this site have been disputing claims by Climate Change skeptics or data / studies that may / may not support their case.

by Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt As highlighted in the introduction to the site, we seek to clarify the findings of scientists who study the earth's climate, and have an informed view on the science of climate change.

Postscript: Randy Olson has posted an interesting piece on his Web site today proposing that the community seeking public trust and engagement on climate change would do well to study the practices of two organizations fighting for science - based behavior in very different arenas: the federal Centers For Disease Control and Prevention and the National Center for Science Education (on evolution in the classcience - based behavior in very different arenas: the federal Centers For Disease Control and Prevention and the National Center for Science Education (on evolution in the clasScience Education (on evolution in the classroom).

For an analysis that, in contrast, reflects an understanding of the scientific evidence that is generally shared in the climate science community, see MacCracken's recent journal article, «Prospects for Future Climate Change and the Reasons for Early Action,» which is posted on the Climate Institute Web site here (3climate science community, see MacCracken's recent journal article, «Prospects for Future Climate Change and the Reasons for Early Action,» which is posted on the Climate Institute Web site here (3Climate Change and the Reasons for Early Action,» which is posted on the Climate Institute Web site here (3Climate Institute Web site here (3.2 MB).

In addition to raising doubts about climate science and about the need to slow climate change by reducing emissions, the company site omits any discussion of the costly consequences of climate change, choosing instead to focus exclusively on high - end estimates of the costs of reducing emissions.

The climate change page on the Environmental Protection Agency's website — a government site that presents the science explaining the changing climate, as well as ways to address it — is now void of data.

Funding for climate and global change research under the Global Change Research Program (FY1989 - FY2002) and Climate Change Science Program (FY2003 - present) is shown in the table on the following page, which is taken from the CCSP weclimate and global change research under the Global Change Research Program (FY1989 - FY2002) and Climate Change Science Program (FY2003 - present) is shown in the table on the following page, which is taken from the CCSP webchange research under the Global Change Research Program (FY1989 - FY2002) and Climate Change Science Program (FY2003 - present) is shown in the table on the following page, which is taken from the CCSP webChange Research Program (FY1989 - FY2002) and Climate Change Science Program (FY2003 - present) is shown in the table on the following page, which is taken from the CCSP weClimate Change Science Program (FY2003 - present) is shown in the table on the following page, which is taken from the CCSP webChange Science Program (FY2003 - present) is shown in the table on the following page, which is taken from the CCSP web site.

This is what climate change skepticism has become; an attack upon the idea of redressing climate change, by strong self reinforcing self convincing, that the science reality itself doesn't pose a huge threat to the stability and moderate - ness of our climate; and there are sites and outlays of information and rhetoric everywhere that feed on this and make it seem more and more legitimate and increasingly self fulfilling.

I will continue to do science - based stories on this site as I have done in the past, but can not possibly keep up with the evolving political stories surrounding climate change.

This anonymously written criticism of NIPCC and Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science appeared on the anti-skeptic Web site ClimateScienceWatch.org and originally appeared on a blog run by Jeff Nesbit, an author of children's novels.

Real Climate «has clearly aligned itself squarely with one political position on climate change» — January 14, 2005 — Excerpt: The site's focus has been exclusively on attacking those who invoke science as the basis for their opposition to action on climate change, folks such as George Will, Senator James Inhofe, Michael Crichton, McIntyre and McKitrick, Fox News, and MyronClimate «has clearly aligned itself squarely with one political position on climate change» — January 14, 2005 — Excerpt: The site's focus has been exclusively on attacking those who invoke science as the basis for their opposition to action on climate change, folks such as George Will, Senator James Inhofe, Michael Crichton, McIntyre and McKitrick, Fox News, and Myronclimate change» — January 14, 2005 — Excerpt: The site's focus has been exclusively on attacking those who invoke science as the basis for their opposition to action on climate change, folks such as George Will, Senator James Inhofe, Michael Crichton, McIntyre and McKitrick, Fox News, and Myronclimate change, folks such as George Will, Senator James Inhofe, Michael Crichton, McIntyre and McKitrick, Fox News, and Myron Ebell.

I have searched your site, but can not find any reference to any «science» which supports the claims that climate change will cause the following, which is «not based on computer modelling»:

I would appreciate it if some scientist on this site could read the U.S. Bishops» statement, «Global Climate Change» (2001, at http://www.usccb.org/sdwp/international/globalclimate.htm), and discuss their use of science.

The only time I heard about it was on the NRDC site but only a paragraph in a summary of climate change science papers, but not really anywhere else.

From our experience with the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and our understanding of current administration procedure, we assume that, before being activated, the site had to be politically cleared both by the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and at a high level at EPA.

After reading posts and the responses — and in particular the moderation responses — I found myself wondering who the ^ % $ these people were (I had never heard of any individual in Climate Science at that point) and I distinctly remember thinking that if this site wanted to convey facts on Climate Change and assist new people they should really change moderators as these people were atroChange and assist new people they should really change moderators as these people were atrochange moderators as these people were atrocious.