Not exact matches
Our
lawyers are able
to you in determining the best route
to protect your custody and
access rights based on your unique
situation.
The Committee then listed six different
situations where
lawyers might consider a more secure communication method than email, including when: 1) communicating highly sensitive or confidential information via email or unencrypted email connections, 2) sending an email
to or from an account that the email sender or recipient shares with others, 3) sending an email
to a client when it is possible that a third person (such as a spouse in a divorce case) knows the password
to the email account, or
to an individual client at that client's work email account, especially if the email relates
to a client's employment dispute with his employer 4) sending an email from a public computer or a borrowed computer or where the
lawyer knows that the emails may be read on a public or borrowed computer or on an unsecure network, 5) sending an email if the
lawyer knows that the recipient may
access it on devices that are potentially accessible
to third persons or are not protected by a password, or 6) sending an email if the
lawyer is concerned that the NSA or other law enforcement agency may read the email, with or without a warrant.
Like the
situation Lear describes in the U.S., there remain multiple and significant gaps in
access to justice across Canada, none of which seem
to be shrinking despite increased awareness of the issues, better data and significant commitment of pro bono hours by
lawyers.
Aaron Street: Yeah I mean I think this can be taken too far, so if you had an example like Brad where he only represents criminal defendants and therefore there's no risk of him having a conflict come through the site when he's getting actual information about actual cases, but you could see in a litigation, let's say a family law
lawyer, if their website were trying
to collect information
to provide tools as both an intake and
access to justice solution that you potentially run into tremendous conflicts of interest problems there and I think obviously any
lawyer considering pursuing this for their firm should think through the implications of their particular
situation, but I think what Brad's doing is awesome in the context of his criminal law practice and I think there are versions of a similar model that could be used in something like your debt collection defense practice or a small business startup practice or an estate planning practice, but that doesn't mean that it's a model that should be replicated by every
lawyer in every practice.
We believe that it is permissible
to «friend» X in this
situation in order
to access nonpublic information only when the
lawyer has been able
to send a message that discloses her identity as the plaintiff's
lawyer.
The selling of legal services can not be allowed
to block
access to the law in
situations wherein the assistance of a
lawyer is necessary in order
to avail oneself of the rule of law and constitutional rights and freedoms.
Although Fastcase has not specifically made an offer in response
to the current
situation, immigration
lawyers who are members of the American Immigration Lawyers Association get access to Fastcase as a member b
lawyers who are members of the American Immigration
Lawyers Association get access to Fastcase as a member b
Lawyers Association get
access to Fastcase as a member benefit.
In the
situation where a youth really has stepped out of line and committed what potentially is a criminal act,
lawyers need
to be well aware that the Youth Criminal Justice Act gives them a whole host of tools and
access to potential resources that are not necessarily available
to somebody who's 18 or over.
So, if this new proposal applies
to lawyers, it should also apply
to other professions like doctors in particular, where lack of
access to adequate care could really be a life or death
situation.
Unfortunately as Savannah car accident
lawyers, we sometimes have
to explain
to clients that the law makes an exception for
situations where minor's are given
access to dangerous things like cars, boats, guns, knives etc..
It's unfortunate that Bill's brother Jim created his
situation by corruptly taking a few thousand dollars «on the side» from
lawyers who wanted
access to the confidential police information that Jim Van Allen illegally provided.
In other
situations access to justice may be achieved without needing
to reach the courts, and
access to lawyers may or may not have been key
to that achievement.
Both solutions will occur because the power of the news media and of the internet, interacting, will quickly make widely known these types of information, the cumulative effect of which will force governments and the courts
to act: (1) the
situations of the thousands of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help of a
lawyer; (2) the statistics as
to the increasing percentages of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges
to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some
lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers of people being denied Legal Aid and court - appointed
lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues
to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried
to help others desperately in need of a
lawyer whom they couldn't afford
to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them
to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as
to be able
to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public
access the law society website they don't see any reference
to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able
to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able
to obtain a
lawyer at reasonable cost.
But those are rare
situations, and there are narrower remedies for dealing with rogue
lawyers than making it more difficult for all citizens
to obtain public records by effectively limiting their
access to the courts.
There will be no obligations when you come in and you'll have
access to a medical malpractice
lawyer who will assess your
situation and inform you of your options.
This might be better stated more simply: «Whenever a
lawyer communicates with a client, the
lawyer must first consider whether, given the client's
situation, there is a significant risk that third parties will have
access to the communications.»
We have a surfeit of trained
lawyers, but a huge deficit in
access to justice — a
situation which simply does not make sense.