And, it is of continuing amusement to us that the global warming
skeptic community now tracks the RSS satellite product rather than our UAH dataset.
Not exact matches
The same plague of us - or - them absolutism that has infested the small
community of self - described «climate
skeptics,» wrecking any chance they could have played a positive role in critiquing mainstream climatology,
now threatens to overwhelm the much larger «safe food» movement, too.
I stumbled
now and then as I began... More than a few
skeptics told me that I was wrong to focus on underserved urban
communities... They were wrong.
What Trenberth wants is for the scientific
community to combine and convince the politicians and the public that CAGW has been established and that public policy should follow unless
skeptics can
now disprove CAGW.
If you deny that the pause even exists then at least face the fact that the vast majority of the rest of the scientific
community has
now left this type of reality - denial behind and finally faced up to what
skeptics have been telling them all this time.
I applaud all of the
skeptics in the scientific
community who are
now standing up to the alarmists.
Now with the power of FOI, we the
skeptic community have the real opportunity to see exactly how things work.
OTOH, a third party «familiar with the
skeptic community» would surely have revealed themselves by
now?
To put Mapleleaf at ease (maybe), I'll say
now that I have written to Dr Schmidt and apologised for allowing my annoyance at his characterisation of the motivation of
skeptics to colour my interpretation of: «None of the seemingly important «conflicts» that are * perceived * in the science are «conflicts» in any real sense within the scientific
community».