That's the message I am getting from
the skeptic side of the issue.
Not exact matches
The Western Fuels Association co-op members were small and besieged by national news stories that gave only the crisis
side of the climate change
issue and desperately needed a national campaign with professional support from reputable academics with long track records as outspoken
skeptics.
Folks on the Al Gore
side of the
issue have been too quick from the inception
of this whole mess to insinuate
skeptics are paid to lie and spread misinformation.
recently remarked momentum really is on «the
skeptics»
side of the
issue.»
Imagine the fallout if he was to become fully informed about Oreskes, Al Gore, Ross Gelbspan, and so many others on that
side of the
issue who deceived the public when they seemingly obscured the collective truth about
skeptic climate scientists.
Pope Francis may literally not be aware
of the
skeptic side of the global warming
issue.
Oh please,
skeptics are people who question all
sides of an
issue (like most qualified climate scientists), and climate contrarians are rarely that, which is why many
of us call them fake
skeptics.
And from my limited ability to see,
skeptics» material destroys the Al Gore / IPCC
side, and the failure
of top people and journalists to see the faults in the political accusation
side of the
issue exposes a far bigger problem.
If you attended the conference, or even if you simply are looking into the
skeptic climate scientist
side of the
issue, one overriding appearance should be readily obvious: the people opposing Al Gore and the IPCC «are not boogeymen or paid shills who are in it for the money» (to quote directly from an otherwise pro - Gore / IPCC reporter I've been corresponding with), and they absolutely do not have just some simplistic nauseatingly repeated one - paragraph «climate change is a hoax» mantra.