Sentences with phrase «skeptical blog posts»

While I agree that there are tons of citizens who are denying climate change based on faith, so far I am seeing plenty of skeptical blog posts that are trying to crunch the numbers, and have reasonable sounding objections).

The greater irony here is you jumping in to defend a poorly written rant loosely disguised as a so - called skeptical blog post against actual articles published in actual scientific journals, however questionable they might be.

Not exact matches

Last year in one of my blog posts I argued that although I remained very skeptical about the sustainability of the China growth model I nonetheless believed that China bulls could make a plausible argument but were failing to do so largely because they did not address the three questions that were fundamental to the debate on the sustainability of the Chinese growth model.

So, when posting on a «faith and belief» blog, the onus is on me to prove to a skeptical internet atheist that God exists?

I have evidence of humans who use the internet to post comments to blogs, including my personal example, so I have no reason to be skeptical of «spiffy's» reality, but I have no evidence of there being a real God.

If you're skeptical about whether or not oats contain gluten, check out this blog post by The Kitchn which should clear up any doubts.

As you complain that the blog host is making assumptions that go beyond publicly posted statements, consider this: I responded only to the facts regarding the comment posted by «Skeptical of your conclusions.»

Great post by the way, I was really skeptical about starting before I read your blog.

At the same time, I'm skeptical that his success at e-publishing is the norm, although he definitely disagrees with that notion in this post on his blog.

Perhaps without even knowing it, you've seen Knoten's «skeptical baby» photo, which he originally posted to his blog in 2011.

Some of the things that I've tried in my quest to understand skeptics and more effectively counter misinformation include posting at skeptical blogs, such as climateaudit, and inviting prominent skeptics to give seminars at Georgia Tech.

William M. Connolley, who blogs at Stoat, has posted a somewhat skeptical first look at the paper (and blistering critique of some of the other analyses of it) that includes these thoughts:

With a keen interest in making this complex subject matter easier for other «non-scientists» to understand, I joined the Skeptical Science team in 2013, helping out «behind the scenes» answering emails from readers, offering suggestions and editing blog posts.

He writes basic level rebuttals and occasional blog posts for Skeptical Science, motivated in part by a concern for the environment, and partly as a counter-reaction to the demagoguery and disinformation that pervades the public discourse on climate science.

# 11 [DB] On [e] helpful (hopefully) interjection: Skeptical Science is comprised of quite literally thousands of blog posts covering all facets of climate science, from the denial to debunking to exposition on the science to solutions.

I just want to see how many responses came from Skeptical Science, there appears to be no blog post, and no forum link either from SkS As far as I know Cook just tweeted it.

Not just Skeptical Science readers - I'm emailing an invitation to 58 50 of the most highly trafficked climate blogs (half of them skeptic), asking them to post a link to the survey.

While talking with them, we made tentative plans for them to translate some of their blog posts into English so that we can cross post them on Skeptical Science.

We put the call out for PayPal donations in a Skeptical Science blog post (Cook 2013a).

As a consequence, Christy's testimony will be the subject of a series of future Skeptical Science blog posts.

The quality of most of the «expert» testimony was quite poor, and as mentioned above, will result in numerous Skeptical Science blog post responses.

Lewis, links to larger versions of those individual graphics can be found on this Skeptical Science blog post.

Over at Concurring Opinions, Frank Pasquale posts here about blogger Tom Bell's skeptical view on the impact of blogs, expressed in this article from May 2006.

At the CBA National Magazine's blog, Yves Faguy has up a roundup of some of the reactions; Andrew Coyne had a skeptical take on the decision in the National Post; Emmet Marfarlane had a great post for Maclean's; and there are othPost; Emmet Marfarlane had a great post for Maclean's; and there are othpost for Maclean's; and there are others.

I was immediately skeptical by the title of your post because lots of blogs have some pretentious ideas.