According to both the Washington Examiner and the news section of the journal Nature, the administration has been weighing lists of
skeptical climate scientists provided by the Heartland Institute, an industry - backed group that has for years run conferences aiming to cast doubt on climate change research.
Not exact matches
But there is a consistent theme to all of them: Davies is cited just for the accusation that illicit funding has gone to skeptic
climate scientists and organizations
skeptical of catastrophic human - induced global warming; when will he finally
provide actual evidence proving the funding was done under arrangements where all parties agreed on what, when, where, and how the lies would be spread??
Rather, that partial list was
provided in order to assist those who want a better understanding that, in fact, there are many more legitimate
scientists who are are
skeptical of the AGW /
climate disaster hypothesis than the number who believe in it.
Most of us skeptics are still waiting to see
climate scientists begin to live up to the Feynman definition of scientific integrity and to
provide complete transparency about data and calculation methods, as well as to respond to the
skeptical scientists in the journals.