Sentences with phrase «skeptical position on»

Given some of the arguments against AGW, and its close relationship with oil & gas and mining, some people might have expected that GSA may have adopted either a neutral or skeptical position on AGW.

You wrote that I misrepresented the 500 papers that support a skeptical position on climate alarm for 2016 and 2017, and you said you established that by reading the «first few» papers and identifying misrepresentations.

Thanks especially for Steve Koonins» piece, replete with the kind of nuanced analysis I like to believe created my skeptical position on CAGW.

485 Scientific Papers Published In 2017 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate Alarm.

Personally, I'd just as soon that the skeptical position on the CAGW issue not be based on our own version of MBH, but what can one do?

Considering there were 500 papers supporting a skeptical position on global warming alarm published in scientific journals during 2016, perhaps the publication of wake - up - call, borderline - iconoclastic scientific papers such as this will become more and more commonplace in the near future.

The fact that Christy and Pielke Sr. are scientists allows their skeptical positions on rapid GHG driven global warming to be even harder to deal with when I attempt to inform people that rapid GHG driven global warming is happening and that humans need to act quickly to reduce GHG emissions in order to delay and to reduce the catastrophe that lies ahead due to global warming.

Not exact matches

Call me crazy» = > your skepticism is NOT based on any understanding of the position of which you are skeptical.

More than half of the 51 New York City Council members say they haven't taken a position on Mayor Bill de Blasio's bill to ban horse drawn carriages, though many indicated they were skeptical of the plan and are leaning toward opposing it.

At first the dean was skeptical, Pembrey says, because he «expected me to take on senior administrative positions at age 55 to give back to the institute.

So these three groups are all rationally skeptical of the overall IPCC position on «dangerous AGW», yet each is so in its own different way.

They aren't examining the data any more, but either believing or not believing, based on an emotional or ideological position rather than reason which is attached to a true skeptical mindset.

No position on whether AGW will be significantly beneficial or harmful) Skeptical Neutral (Uncertain about AGW, but still open to data that might alter this view.)

It is hard to dispute this except to note that Krauthammer here has taken a radically skeptical position not merely on climate science, but on all science.

So Gleick is thrown under the bus but the main concern seems to be the fact that this event has given those who are skeptical of the IPCC (and AGU) «consensus position» on CAGW» fresh fuel for the unproductive and seemingly endless ideological firestorm surrounding the reality of the Earth's changing climate.»

(Skeptical Science) When these politicians are asked about the basis for their positions on climate change, they almost always respond by saying such things as they «have heard that there is a disagreement among scientists» or similar responses that strongly suggest they have informed an opinion on climate change science without any understanding of the depth of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus view 0f climate change has been based.

In the final chapter «On The Way Forward», Morano writes climate sanity was restored to the United States with Trump's election, and that Trump is: «The warmists» worst nightmare: the first Republican presidential nominee who ever staked out a strongly science - supported skeptical position not only on climate change claims but also on the socalled «solutions».&raquOn The Way Forward», Morano writes climate sanity was restored to the United States with Trump's election, and that Trump is: «The warmists» worst nightmare: the first Republican presidential nominee who ever staked out a strongly science - supported skeptical position not only on climate change claims but also on the socalled «solutions».&raquon climate change claims but also on the socalled «solutions».&raquon the socalled «solutions».»

I consider myself rationally skeptical of this premise (or paradigm, as it has become in some circles, at least partly as a result of superb IPCC salesmanship), so let me challenge you and (what I believe to be) your position on AGW, as stated above.

Sometimes individuals argue either the warmist or AGW - skeptical positions for a reason that's just plain bad on almost anyone's view, because it contravenes very basic and uncontroversial scientific or logical principles.

On the other hand, the government should be supportive of the effort and should make a commitment to accept the red team's definition of the skeptical position.

A new survey of over 12,000 peer - reviewed climate science papers by our citizen science team at Skeptical Science has found a 97 % consensus among papers taking a position on the cause of global warming in the peer - reviewed literature that humans are responsible.

«What they (the Democrats & warmists) are so afraid of is this: Trump is the first Republican Presidential nominee that has ever staked out a strongly science supported skeptical position not only on climate science claims, but also on the so - called «solutions».

Beyond this common ground, we fall on different points of the spectrum between James's pragmatic approach, where he proposes giving decision makers information as our «best guess» about future outcomes nonetheless, and Lenny's highly skeptical position — namely, there's no hope in approximating the real world in any useful sense.

You support the IPCC position that this is strongly positive, based on maintaining essentially constant RH with warming, while I am more skeptical of this claim on a long - term basis.

It's quite common to list past job titles and prior positions held; hiring managers may be skeptical of candidates that do not include this information on their resumes.

Taking on the position of being an Educational Director is a huge responsibility, so you might be skeptical of getting the job with no prior experience at it.

Builders were skeptical about whether they could position a house on the parcel.