Sentences with phrase «skeptical questions by»

To read the tea leaves — which is to say, the seemingly skeptical questions by the judges to the UC lawyers — Team Doudna / Charpentier had a rough day yesterday.

Not exact matches

ALBANY — State lawmakers are growing more skeptical of the Cuomo administration's economic development practices, as long - simmering questions have been reinforced by a slew of felony charges and continual power plays by the Democratic governor.

The «political atmospherics» of the meeting might polish Trump's optics, but Bledsoe is skeptical about its influence on public policy, which is being overseen in some cases by transition officials who question the scientific findings on global warming.

I'm not sure such expertise exists at all — and given that the fund in question under - performed a vanilla bond index when managed by the so - called professionals, I'm highly skeptical that if such expertise does exist that a small firm like WS will suddenly possess it in - house... and Eric Kirzner has been there since the beginning, which I should stop ranting about in the footnote.

Further general questions can usually be be answered by first using the Search function in the upper left of every Skeptical Science page to see if there is already a post on it (odds are, there is).

Dana Nuccitelli has posted a long useful piece at Skeptical Science exploring the issues raised by Annan and others on the sensitivity question.

A key site for addressing a wide range of questions raised by climate change «skeptics» is Skeptical Science (www.skepticalscience.com)-- in particular the questions discussed with references to the scientific literature at http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php.

In sum, Republican respondents were more skeptical that global climate change is a real phenomenon when an otherwise identical question was worded in terms of «global warming» rather than «climate change»; no other political group (Democrats, Independents, and Others) was significantly affected by question wording.

He defends the «dangerous AGW» paradigm against those who are rationally skeptical of this paradigm by simply telling them they are not qualified to question the experts who support the paradigm.

Although his comment suggested such, I doubt that he really believes that individual commenters here were responding because something had been «deemed urgent» by some unspecified «deemers,» and, (2) it seems to me that you might be drawing conclusions from Lewandowsky's research that (assuming you find his research methodology to be valid — which some seem to question) are not supported by the evidence he offered: Evidence that informs the question of whether conspiracy ideation is relatively more prevalent on the «skeptical» side than the «realist» side.

I submit a better 4th questions is — Why are some people skeptical that climate change is caused by humans?»

I have attempted to answer the first question previously in a Skeptical Science post that discussed the 2012 Nature Climate Change article by Neil Swart and Andrew Weaver.

However, given the spate of recent priority and loss transfer appeals, skeptical minds might question whether the change perhaps came about by design.

But Enrich did face several skeptical policy - related questions from Justices Antonin Scalia, who asked whether taxes are political issues that should be decided by legislators, not courts, and David Souter, who questioned whether tax incentives such as Ohio's are truly discriminatory.

But I am skeptical of Professor Olszynski's suggestion that the presumption that questions of law must be addressed by courts should, in the name of democratic accountability, by rebutted by privative clauses.