Sentences with phrase «skeptical scientists»

The phrase "skeptical scientists" refers to scientific researchers or experts who have doubts or questions about a particular idea or claim. These scientists may not easily accept new information or theories without substantial evidence or proof. They trust in the scientific method of investigation and require strong evidence to change their beliefs. Full definition
Scientific meetings are now being dominated by a growing number of skeptical scientists.
If I believed his arguments with you and other skeptical scientists were purely scientific, I to would take your position.
Even the most skeptical scientists agree that the experiment was carefully performed and analyzed.
The leading skeptical scientist is caught agreeing with this and has no adequate response.
In some countries this means skeptical scientists are frozen out by the sort of self - selected true - believers one would expect to find in government departments focused on the environment.
Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message.
Not only do journalists not have a responsibility to report what skeptical scientists have to say about global warming, they have a responsibility not to report what these scientists say.
While examining these arguments from skeptical scientists, something quickly becomes apparent: many of the arguments are contradictory.
The amicus curiae provided by CEI include skeptical scientists Sallie Baliunas, John Christy, Christopher de Freitas, David Legates, Anthony R. Lupo, Patrick Michaels, Joel Schwartz, and Roy Spencer.
Its goal was to get coverage for skeptical scientists, and such coverage was effective, as Gelbspan first learned in 1995, after co-writing an article with an IPCC physician on how global warming would affect the spread of disease.
Several skeptical scientists picked apart the general consensus of their peers, who say humans are warming the Earth at an unprecedented pace.
On Monday, the National Academy of Sciences disassociated itself from the most recent effort to drum up support among skeptical scientists.
Grijalva's letter targets universities where noted skeptical scientists work, including MIT's Dr. Richard Lindzen, Georgia Tech's Dr. Judith Curry, Colorado's Dr. Roger Pielke Jr. and the University of Alabama's John Christy and Roy Spencer.
-- Groups, such as Heartland, gathered and published data and reports that contradicted the IPCC «consensus» CAGW position and held climate conferences of their own, where skeptical scientists could present their findings.
Luckily, skeptical scientists rejected the «Biblical invisible demon theory» and pinned it on microscopic but visible physical realities called GERMS.
Answering skeptical scientists» dubious papers is a prime example.
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley About 18 months ago, as soon as I heard of Dr. Richard Müller's Berkeley Earth Temperature project, I sent an email to several skeptical scientists drawing their attention to his statement that he considered his team's attempt to verify how much «global warming» had occurred since 1750 to be one of the most important pieces of research ever to be conducted in the history of science.
Like a simple parlor trick, the networks are able to make skeptical scientists vanish, at least from the eyes of their viewers.
CBS was the worst, ignoring skeptical scientists for 1,391 days, ever since the May 15, 2010, «Evening News.»
Neutral and skeptical scientists frequently used the word «uncertainties» out of politeness, when referring to dubious methods and errors in the works of practitioners, associated with alarmism.
They conferred awards and recognition on each other, excluded skeptical scientists from «peer reviews» of one another's papers, and conspired to blackball editors who permitted the publication of professional papers by Sallie Baliunas, Willie Soon, Patrick Michaels, Richard Lindzen, Roy Spencer and other climate experts whose work challenged the Mann - made global warming disaster thesis.
Today, decades later, the climate science establishment is still whacking away, faster and more frenetically than ever, as more and more skeptical scientists, journalists and politicians surface.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z