As far as I know, this experience left no ill effects, except a persistent
skepticism about claims that exposure to this, that or the other chemical is inevitably a health disaster.
Skepticism about claims of success is always a good thing, as Liam suggested earlier, but Ravitch undermines her credibility by inventing these weak - kneed and flammable straw men to set fire to.
I share
your skepticism about claims that serving kids junk food is a financial necessity for school systems — I can even rebut those claims better than you ever could.
When co-founder and CEO Travis Kalanick said in October that the company currently has 30 % to 35 % of the ride - hailing market there, Chinese rival Didi Kuaidi and others quickly raised
skepticism about the claim.
Not exact matches
The second is the president's habitual misstatements of facts and statistics that I really think have caused the court to look upon his
claims about the national - security imperative for this order with great
skepticism.»
There's also
skepticism about North Korea's
claims about its reentry technology, which is needed to return a warhead to the atmosphere from space so it can hit its intended target.
Though there has long been
skepticism about whether Cambridge Analytica was as effective as it
claimed, experts expect this technology to only improve, especially as artificial intelligence and virtual reality steadily grow more powerful.
The shift reflects a growing
skepticism in the
claims technology providers make
about their products and services.
An epistemology oriented by the cross shares feminists»
skepticism about traditional science «s
claims about objectivity.
Soft just war theory is characterized by seven key components: a strongly articulated horror of war; a strong presumption against war; a
skepticism about government
claims; the use of just war theory as a tool for citizen discernment and prophetic critique; a pattern of trusting the efficacy of international treaties, multilateral strategies and the perspectives of global peace and human rights groups and the international press; a quite stringent application of just war criteria; and a
claim of common ground with Christian pacifists.
As Hirsch rightly pointed out,
skepticism about herme neutics undercuts the
claim of any humanistic discipline to provide genuine knowledge, however provisional.
It also deals with the means of production of knowledge, as well as
skepticism about different knowledge
claims.
Dr Perlmutter IS right and years of science and research back up his
claims along with true testimonials from real people - have you even read the book??? like I said before people like you who are not willing to give up gluten carbs and sugars are going to be the first ones to come on here with
skepticism and
claims that this is just another «fad diet - «newsflash Will this is a lifestyle and the followers are not in a cult they are real people who want to take charge of their health and live to see their great grandchildren and still be sound in their minds its fine to have questions but to come on here and insult this fine doctor who has helped so many people throughout his career and has written a New York times best seller to educate and help so many more people just makes you sound absurd and immature - he is speaking the truth everything we've been told
about nutrition is a lie to profit the wheat industry, doctors and pharmaceutical companies because as long as people keep eating the wrong foods and getting sicker and fatter they will all profit.
Of course another interpretation would simply be to posit that those rejecting the alarming visions of a human - unraveled climate are illustrating another solid human trait —
skepticism about overwrought
claims in the absence of hard evidence (don't expect that any time soon) or direct experience (same deal, at least in prosperous places).
Sorry, my
skepticism about DDT
claims was set into high gear by repetition of flat out lies told
about WHO and DDT bans, so you'll have to do better than a citation containing ``..
Skepticism in general does not make strong scientific claims, as it is more about what we do not know (hence the name sk
Skepticism in general does not make strong scientific
claims, as it is more
about what we do not know (hence the name
skepticismskepticism).
Then there was widespread
skepticism about the nearly 200,000 such jobs the administration
claims to have created.
I urge everone to exercise the same cautious
skepticism about automakers»
claims you would
about climate blog
claims.
My questions
about a) Christy and Spencer are relevant to the points raised on this thread by Craig Loehle abourt conflicts of interest; b) My points and questions
about you failing applying
skepticism and scrutiny equally is also relevant to the whole point of your blog and
claims about caring
about the science and building bridges.
What makes a scientist is one driven by curiosity to find out
about things and who will follow the scientific method and not become confused over what they know and what they only think they know or know that they don't know and who do not accept theories,
claims, or even experimental results without some level of
skepticism.
I've analyzed some of the most alarmist
claims, and my
skepticism about them hasn't changed.
Nor is denial of any warming the same as
skepticism about Gore's hysterical
claims about hurricanes.
As we have documented in numerous articles on the disinformation campaign on this website, although responsible scientific
skepticism is necessary for science to advance, the climate change disinformation campaign has been involved not in the pursuit of responsible scientific
skepticism but in tactics that are morally reprehensible including: (a) telling lies
about mainstream climate scientific evidence or engaging in reckless disregard for the truth, (b) focusing on unknowns
about climate science while ignoring settled climate change science, that is cherry - picking the evidence, (c) creating front groups and Astroturf groups that hide the real parties in interest behind
claims, (d) making specious
claims about «good science», (e) manufacturing science sounding
claims about climate change by holding conferences in which
claims are made and documents are released that have not been subjected to scientific peer - review, and (d) cyber bullying journalists and scientists.
I haven't seen any of the discussion
about him
claim any recent conversion to
skepticism.
During the segment, Stossel portrayed
skepticism about global warming as just as scientifically valid as respectable scientific research and opinion showing that the climate is changing; misleadingly suggested that projections of the future global climate are comparable to a local news channel's «weather forecast»; and highlighted Crichton's
claim that climate scientists have an incentive to exaggerate global warming in order to win grants.
Much of the credit for the rising tide of public
skepticism toward the outlandish
claims of the global warming Jeremiahs goes to the Heartland Institute, which The Economist has called «the world's most prominent think tank promoting
skepticism about man - made climate change.»
Maybe you need another subset classification for group 4 — those that don't actually reject any of the science specifically and occasionally
claim to accept it, but still drop in the occasional vague sentiment
about skepticism being healthy etc or more research needs to be done as a reason for not supporting any attempt to tackle the issue.
Michael: Maybe you need another subset classification for group 4 — those that don't actually reject any of the science specifically and occasionally
claim to accept it, but still drop in the occasional vague sentiment
about skepticism being healthy etc or more research needs to be done as a reason for not supporting any attempt to tackle the issue.
I expressed
skepticism about the likelihood of success of a legal - vertical professional network and I called out the site's founders for
claiming to be the «first online professional network for the legal community,» which was not so — although Matthew Tollin, wireLawyer's cofounder and CEO, disagreed with me.
I have written previous posts
about my
skepticism regarding this program, particularly with respect to the unsupported
claims by its proponents that the program will lower legal costs and increase access to justice.
And our
skepticism about insurance is understandable — health insurance especially is a notorious mess and most of us have had infuriating experiences with denied
claims, overcharges, and incomprehensible bills.
Developers, meanwhile, have conveyed a great deal of
skepticism about Telegram's ability to achieve the goals it has laid out for the Telegram Open Network (TON), including its
claim that the network will process 1 million transactions per second.