Even prominent
skeptics like Monckton, Lindzen, Spencer, Idso, McKitrick and Michaels accept the basics, and I suspect Watts, Goddard, and maybe even Morano do as well.
Not exact matches
Some
skeptics concede the existence of AGW denialism and some do not hesitate to disavow people
like Monckton, just as I will always be quick to disavow claims of GW causing an emminent ice age in Europe or claims that we will boil off the oceans.
I think the point is that by not criticizing
Monckton, the
skeptics don't indicate any more knowledge than him on those issues
like what sensitivity actually means.