Rather than just deprecate others, please simply explain how the mass
slaughter of innocents in the recent Tsunamis was the work of a loving god.
He did not condemn the
wholesale slaughter of the innocent Christian indegenous populations, including women and children, in Plateau state, Benue state, Southern Kaduna, Kebbi state, Borno state, Adamawa state and elsewhere in the north by Janjaweed - like Fulani militants.
Each person who made the journey, each person who tacitly or actively acquiesced to the
Nazi slaughter of the innocents as well those who opposed it, had to define and redefine the meaning of his or her career and life in improbable conditions of place, language, and tradition.
First of all there is no parallel between the US removal of the brutal genocidal pervert totalitarian dictator Saddam Hussein / trying to give the Iraqi people democracy and the brutal, hypocritical, false premise / lie - based
Japanese slaughter of innocent whales.
Where was god in the mass
slaughter of the innocents in the recent two Tsunamis??? Same place he was when he parted the Red Sea for the Israelites.
Once again, this article is about
the slaughter of an innocent human not whether evolution is fact (which it is) or not.
He was guarded in his wartime comments, conscious of the repercussions Jews might suffer, but in his 1942 Christmas broadcast he condemned
the slaughter of innocent victims on the grounds of race or nationality.
Jesus was not born in Bethlehem at least the one we are familiar with (Professor Bruce Chilton in his Rabbi Jesus) and there were no angels,
no slaughter of the innocents by Herod, no visiting wise men and no escape to Egypt.
Jesus was not born in Bethlehem at least the one we are familiar with (Professor Bruce Chilton in his Rabbi Jesus) and there were no pretty wingie thingies singing from on high (even B16 now admits this),
no slaughter of the innocents by Herod, no visiting wise men and no escape to Egypt.
(A «
slaughter of the innocents» tale which parallels that of Matthew 2:13 - 16).
Anything below that is
the slaughter of the innocents.
No Christian can approve
the slaughter of innocent babies.
This parallels Herod's
slaughter of the innocents in an attempt to kill Jesus (Matthew 2:13 - 16).
There is no mention of Jesus birth in Bethlehem, the wise men, his escape to Egypt, or
the slaughter of the innocents in any of the writings of Paul or in the first Gospel written, Mark.
I would never justify
the slaughter of innocents.
Do you know that you're religion is no better and that many times all throughout history your religion has been used as a basis for
the slaughter of innocents all in the name of god?
Even in the face of the worst evil ever committed —
the slaughter of the innocent Lamb of God — Jesus did not resist, but said, «Father forgive them.»
I can guarantee that our Lord would have some pretty strong things to say about
the slaughter of innocent children under the umbrella of abortion!
Just as King Herod's
slaughter of the innocent is unsurprising (though lamentable), so too is the language of post-reproductive humanity, such as that hinted at by the author of the «Five Year Plan» or, in more sophisticated fashion, by Lauren Berlant and Michel Foucault.
The dogma of many concerning scriptural inerrancy becomes abusive when it attempts to justify genocide, infanticide,
slaughter of innocents, slavery, homophobia, misogyny, and a host of other clearly immoral actions and / or beliefs on the basis that God MUST have said or done these things because a very barbaric bronze aged civilization grasping to understand God said He did, Thus the FALSE dogma becomes abusive in that there is no accounting for the basic principles of right and wrong.
Why would he condone and order
the slaughter of innocent children?
In connection with
the slaughter of the innocent, the Pope mentions that killing in self - defense or in defense of others is quite another matter, since the aggressor is at fault.
I do like spectating though — it is like
slaughter of the innocents on here at times, the naivety of some is truly something to behold.
When we see
the slaughter of innocent school children, how can we not stand up and say Never Again.
Known for his astounding feats of architecture, and more infamously for
the slaughter of innocent children in the town of Bethlehem,
Yes, a 3 - D cartoon about martial - arts animals is actually riffing on the Gospel story of
the slaughter of the innocents.
Dressed in a series of flamboyant dresses and powdered wigs, Effie's a caricature of Panem's elite; whilst endorsing
the slaughter of innocent children, she's more concerned with day - to - day manners.
Finally, the term massacre, which suggests the wholesale
slaughter of innocent, unarmed people, is in direct conflict with evidence showing that the Lakota warriors were simply defending themselves, their women, and their children against an armed attack.