The phrase
"slave owners" refers to people who would own and control other individuals, known as slaves, as property. These
slave owners would have power and authority over the lives and work of the slaves.
Full definition
Still other children have endured torture at the hands
of slave owners, or have witnessed torture at the hands of enemies.
The symbolism was poignant: This great - granddaughter of slaves was addressing a denomination once led
by slave owners.
Walking around with pictures of dead colonial
slave owners doesn't really light my fire.
Given their military backgrounds, organizing a successful rebellion and escape was well within their aptitude, and became a persistent problem for
American slave owners.
My ancestors were
not slave owners, but they fought a war to protect their neighbors who were.
If you were active in opposing things like gay rights people a hundred years from now will remember you at least as well as we
remember slave owners these days.
You're saying that having slaves is more important because the
rich slave owners will suffer financially without them.
Why do you think
slave owners treated slaves so badly, looked down on them and considered them nothing more than property but yet they were worthy enough to sleep with?
I suspect you will come with up with a number greater than zero, but I also suspect the actual number is much, much less than the number
of slave owners.
«The Birth of a Nation» Lowdown: Nate Parker's directs and stars in this true story about a former slave that sparks a rebellion against white
slave owners in Virginia in 1831.
The group, armed with knives, axes and whatever they can find, goes on a killing spree, using the Bible as justification, just
as slave owners used the Bible to show that slavery has always existed
«One day on the red hills of Georgia, sons of former slaves and sons of
former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.
It's a great triumph when an actor is a standout in a cast full of standouts, and Sarah Paulson (TV's «American Horror Story») stands out as Mistress Epps, the exceptionally cruel yet tormented wife of
brutal slave owner Edwin Epps (Michael Fassbender).
After sweeping the grand jury and audience awards at this year's Sundance Film Festival, Nate Parker's directorial debut, in which he plays slave Nat Turner who orchestrates an uprising
against slave owners in Virginia, is receiving a lot of award - season heat.
Personally, I think that the day will come when the religious Right will be regarded
like slave owners and those who burned witches.
God's answer to
slave owners taking a rod and beating their elderly female slaves (even breaking their bones as long as they didn't die «in a day or so») was there was to be NO VENGEANCE taken on them.
Chiwetel Ejiofor, who embodies the perfect blend of strength and forced passivity as Solomon Northup, was already attached, as were Michael Fassbender as
sadistic slave owner Edwin Epps and Brad Pitt as abolitionist Bass.
Having read the source material, it was obvious that brutal
slave owner Edwin Epps would be a meaty role.
Solomon is soon re-named Platt and his story of twelve years of slavery and bondage under
many slave owners is told as he thinks of ways to regain his freedom.
After that it's a clash of wills and a study in resilience, with the filmmakers careful to balance the sadistic
slave owners with more sympathetic ones.
Older and with a much sounder footing than the Christian training manual
for slave owners.
He noted that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were
also slave owners and added: «I wonder, is it George Washington next week?
Consequently, one of the greatest problems of the early church was in getting
Christian slave owners and Christian slaves to treat each other as spiritual equals.
For instance, there's a scene where Professor Tolson (Denzel Washington) attempts instill some self respect in his pupils by quoting from Willie Lynch's 1712 speech supposedly delivered to
fellow slave owners about how to mold and control the minds of their slaves.
Inglourious Basterds made a strong statement against the Nazi's, while this latest goes hard
after slave owners.
The trail leads to the immense plantation Candyland, owned by the brutal and
racist slave owner Calvin Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio).
The central cast are all superb: Leonardo DiCaprio is genuinely creepy as brutal
slave owner Calvin Candie, Samuel L Jackson gives the performance of his career thus far as his servant Stephen (a deeply unsettling Uncle Tom figure), while Christoph Waltz as kindly bounty hunter Dr King Schultz and Jamie Foxx as the eponymous hero (a slave Schultz frees to become his henchman) make one of modern cinema's great double acts.
Jones» poignant and beautiful exploration of the life of a
black slave owner won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction and the National Book Critics Circle award.
He's well supported by Michael Fassbender's and Benedict Cumberbatch's very
different slave owners, the heartbreaking Lupita Nyong» o as a fellow slave, and Brad Pitt in a key cameo.
Artful and intimate (Nelson's own father briefly overlapped Carver at Tuskegee), the book introduced me to the botanist's late - in - life friendship with a young descendant of white
slave owners named Jim Hardwick.
Of course, many slaves were also killed and the fallout was that
slave owners became more wary of the possible actions of slaves... while it also provided a glimmer of hope, and generational stories, for those who remained enslaved.
Did you know that the first
registered slave owner in the United States was a black man by the name of Anthony Johnson?
And if so, will National Cathedral's historical purging continue, perhaps to remove the body of Wilson, whose administration re-segregated the federal workforce, or the statues and windows that
honor slave owners like Washington, Jefferson and Madison?
However Christian bashing and discrimination — ESPECIALLY Catholic bashing in modern society is regrettably as alive and well as a bigotted southern
plantation slave owner in the 1840s.
If slavery is in force, in the sense that
slave owners adhere to its norms and the political community enforces them, then slaves can not choose in a manner that expresses dissent from the putative validity of the practice.