Sentences with phrase «slightly larger warming»

UAH data for the same period actually shows slightly larger warming of 0.16 C (data here in the AUST column).

The forced component of SAT trends shows warming everywhere, with magnitudes of 1 — 2 °C over Europe, northern Africa, Greenland and the eastern U.S., and slightly larger warming (2 — 3 °C) over Russia and Canada, with the largest SAT increases (3 — 4 °C) surrounding Hudson's Bay (Fig. 2b).

When Menne et al., 2010 compared the homogenized stations with good Surface Stations ratings to the ones with bad ratings, they found that they were nearly identical — in fact, the good stations showed a slightly larger warming trend.

As Andy discussed, BEST also demonstrated that rural temperature stations show essentially the same, and in fact even a slightly larger warming trend as urban and more poorly - sited stations (Figure 2).

«Hulme et al. (2001) note that there is slightly larger warming in the June — August and September — November seasons than in December — February and March — May.»

Not exact matches

Gluten - Free Oregano Garlic Pizza Dough (Makes 1 large 16 inch pizza) 1/4 cup Garbanzo Fava Flour 3/4 cups white rice flour 1/2 cup tapioca flour 1 1/2 teaspoons xanthan gum 3/4 teaspoons sea salt 1 teaspoon oregano 1 1/2 teaspoon garlic powder 3/4 cups lukewarm water 1 1/2 teaspoons Saf - Instant yeast 2 egg whites slightly beaten 1/2 teaspoon vinegar 1 - tablespoon cane juice crystals 1 tablespoon oil Add sugar and yeast to lukewarm water and set aside in a warm place to foam (approximately 5 minutes).

1) Mix flour, butter and icing sugar in a bowl using two knives to cut the butter until the mixture resembles fine breadcrumbs 2) Add in the egg yolks and vanilla extracts and mix well, then add iced water until the dough starts to come together 3) Shape the dough into a ball on a cool, flat, floured surface 4) Flatten dough into a disc and then wrap in plastic wrap, and chill in the refrigerator for at least 30 minutes 5) Meanwhile, peel, core and slice the apples into as thin slices as possible 6) Mix sugar and ground cinnamon powder with sliced apples and let it rest for a while 7) Pre-heat oven to 180 deg cel 8) Once dough has chilled, roll pastry dough on a sheet of parchment paper until it has expanded to the size of the tart mold (I used a rough mold the size of a large pizza) 9) Leaving at least an inch of dough free, arrange apple slices by overlapping them slightly in the shape of a circle, starting from the outermost part of the circle, until you reach the inside 10) Fold the edges of dough over the filling and then sprinkle the dough with a bit of sugar 11) Bake for about 40 - 45 minutes, or until the crust is golden brown and the apples are soft 12) Serve warm, with a side of whipped cream or ice cream (optional)

Directions: Saute chopped leeks and garlic in butter, medium low heat, until very soft — 10 — 15 minutes / Add 1 t fresh thyme if you have it / Mix milk and egg together with salt & pepper / When tart shell is done and slightly cooled, sprinkle one half of the cheese on the bottom / Spread cooked leeks over cheese, pour egg milk mixture over the leeks / Sprinkle top with remaining cheese / Bake in a 375 degree oven until egg is barely set and tart is lightly golden — 15 — 20 minutes, longer for a larger pan with more filling / Remove from oven, lift out of tart pan base, place on a rack to cool a bit / Serve while warm / Swoon.

Transfer pork and ham hock to a large bowl, let cool slightly, then shred into bite - size pieces discarding skin, bones, and excess fat; cover to keep warm.

Toss potatoes, warm vinegar mixture, and peanuts in a large bowl; let cool slightly.

If this happens, and you need to remelt the chocolate, simply put chocolate bowl back into the slightly larger bowl containing the warm water.

«However, it is also slightly larger than the Earth, and so the hope would be that this would result in a thicker atmosphere that would provide extra insulation» and make the surface warm enough to keep water liquid.

Scientists have generally attributed that darkening to larger, slightly less white snow grains caused by warmer temperatures.

It is difficult for radicals to do much at — 440ºF, but when the temperature warms even slightly (as when a star begins to form), the radicals merge to form larger molecules.

The CTD sections show that the deeper layers are also warmer and slightly saltier and the observed sea level can be explained by steric expansion over the upper 2000 m. ENSO variability impacts on the northern part of the section, and a simple Sverdrup transport model shows how large - scale changes in the wind forcing, related to the Southern Annular Mode, may contribute to the deeper warming to the south.

Let toasted almonds cool slightly (5 - 10 minutes), then add still - warm almonds to large food processor.

If you don't want to warm the entire pouch, you can warm a smaller portion by pouring the desired amount into a bowl, then placing that bowl into a slightly larger bowl of warm water.

Make the mixture quite runny (not nearly as thick as you would make it for a poultice) and warm it by placing your bowl over another, slightly larger, that contains hot water (a bain - marie).

Dalebrook is quieter (fewer people know about it), it has an outdoor shower, space to sit against the wall, a change room, and large boulders that allow for skipping out into the pool before plunging into the Indian ocean's slightly warmer waters.

For a Cape Town beach with a unique twist head to Boulders Beach; its soft sand and slightly warmer sea (Boulders is on the Indian Ocean's False Bay coastline) are home to a large colony of endangered African penguins.

«Note: LOTI provides a more realistic representation of the global mean trends than dTs below; it slightly underestimates warming or cooling trends, since the much larger heat capacity of water compared to air causes a slower and diminished reaction to changes.»

So the problem has been principally with MSU 2LT, which despite a strong surface temperature trend did not seem to have been warming very much — while models and basic physics predict that it should be warming at a slightly larger rate than the surface.

Consenquently, the associated SST pattern is slightly cooler in the deep convection upwelling regions of the Equitorial Pacific and the Indian Ocean, strongly cooler in the nearest deep convection source region of the South Atlantic near Africa and the Equator, warm over the bulk of the North Atlantic, strongly warmer where the gulf stream loses the largest portion of its heat near 50N 25W, and strongly cooler near 45N 45W, which turns out to be a back - eddy of the Gulf Stream with increased transport of cold water from the north whenever the Gulf Stream is running quickly.

The debate is about whether the increase in warming is small, medium or (unlikely in my mind) large, and then whether we should be further bankrupting already bankrupt societies to only slightly affect that rate of warming, whatever it is.

While changes in solar output have slightly increased global average temperature since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the planet - warming effect of man - made greenhouse gases is about 20 times larger -LRB-

Regarding variability, the ISPM fails to mention that the IPCC found that the larger «natural climatic variability» is almost all in the direction of cooler temperatures, relative to «previous estimations», for the past millenium: «The additional variability shown in some new studies [since the Third Assesment Report] implies mainly cooler temperatures (predominantly in the 12th to 14th, 17th and 19th centuries), and only one new reconstruction suggests slightly warmer conditions (in the 11th century, but well within the uncertainty range indicated in the TAR).»

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

All four of the datasets indicate that the spring and annual warming rates are slightly larger for the WA than the WAIS domain, while the winter warming trend is not statistically significant in the WA domain.

So the problem has been principally with MSU 2LT, which despite a strong surface temperature trend did not seem to have been warming very much - while models and basic physics predict that it should be warming at a slightly larger rate than the surface.

I think Crispwell was referring to the Antarctic sea ice which is growing a slightly larger annual extent which is a little odd when you consider the globe is warming.

The level of warmth during the peak of the MWP in the second half of the 10th century, equalling or slightly exceeding the mid-20th century warming, is in agreement with the results from other more recent large - scale multi-proxy temperature reconstructions by Moberg et al. (2005), Mann et al. (2008, 2009), and Ljungqvist (2010)».

Note: LOTI provides a more realistic representation of the global mean trends than dTs below; it slightly underestimates warming or cooling trends, since the much larger heat capacity of water compared to air causes a slower and diminished reaction to changes; dTs on the other hand overestimates trends, since it disregards most of the dampening effects of the oceans that cover about two thirds of the Earth's surface.

A tiny fraction of the thousands of combinations of parameters can give a result with no warming; a slightly larger fraction give a horrendous warming of 10 °C or even more.

The data record that NCDC currently provides, GHCNv3, initiated in 2011, yields a slightly larger global warming trend (0.75 °C for 1900 — 2010, while GHCNv2 yields 0.72 °C), but the changes are too small to affect the conclusions of our present study.

The «note» you refer to goes: «Note: LOTI provides a more realistic representation of the global mean trends than dTs below; it slightly underestimates warming or cooling trends, since the much larger heat capacity of water compared to air causes a slower and diminished reaction to changes; dTs on the other hand overestimates trends, since it disregards most of the dampening effects of the oceans that cover about two thirds of the earth's surface.»