Sentences with phrase «slightly less fuel»

We had been racing and driving so hard for 24 hours, and I was racing a very fast teammate and our team car, which had slightly less fuel and newer tires.

It only gets slightly less fuel economy too than the standard Jetta, but you will need to fuel up on premium to get all those horses.

The 3.5 L is available with either front or all - wheel - drive, with the front - wheel - drive version being rated at 21/34 mpg and the all - wheel - drive version being only slightly less fuel efficient at 21/31 mpg.

The Santa Fe SE Ultimate and Limited Ultimate are slightly less fuel efficient, at 17 city / 23 highway with FWD and 17 city / 22 highway with AWD.

It makes slightly less fuel economy than its sibling the Highlander.

The Audi S1 Sportback five - door version is slightly heavier and therefore slightly less fuel - efficient than the three - door, returning 39.8 mpg, or 38.7 mpg on the larger wheels.

Equipped with an automatic transmission, the Eco is slightly less fuel - efficient: 31 mpg combined (26 city / 39 highway).

The front - wheel drive Rogue Sport is rated at 25/32 mpg and if you choose all - wheel drive it's only slightly less fuel efficient at 24/30 mpg.

The front - wheel drive 2019 RDX is rated at 22/28 mpg, while the all - wheel drive version is slightly less fuel efficient at 21/27 mpg.

«It's 25 percent cheaper than a turbodiesel, gets slightly less fuel efficiency, and needs no urea tank,» she says.

Not exact matches

It's not only fast, but also fuel - efficient (though slightly less so with all - wheel drive).

It's reasonably safe (but slightly less so) to say that if the car has a catalytic converter, it probably has electronic ECU with fuel injection, and thus a rev limiter.

The 2016 Prius is about the quietest ride this side of a plug - in electric vehicle, and considering its exceptional fuel - economy rating of 50/54 mpg city / highway, it's only slightly less efficient than a plug - in too.

Dodge will happily sell you a 485 - hp Charger R / T Scat Pack for $ 10,000 less while offering better exterior styling and fuel economy along with a slightly higher - quality interior and, most importantly, folding rear seats.

Premium fuel is actually slightly lower in btus than regular, AV gas, which is 110 Octane has 4 % less btus than regular

This avoids «back driving» the axle shafts, resulting in less wear and drag and slightly improved fuel economy.

The Sonic was also unable to confidently trump the Swift in fuel consumption figures, with the Suzuki being largely more economical under duress, and only slightly less economical under regular driving — the Suzuki sipping 6.3 l / 100 km, whilst the effortless torque of the Chevrolet helped it to figures of 6.2 l / 100 km.

The Camry's fuel economy is slightly less than the Corolla's.

Its 57.6 mpg fuel economy is only slightly poorer than the 58.9 mpg that the less powerful engine can manage, which sits a tax - band below the more powerful engine.

Perhaps just as worryingly, the TRD Pro's pricing is only a few thousand dollars less that of the Ram 1500 Rebel, which not only tows and hauls a lot more, it's actually likely to be slightly more fuel efficient.

Although their fuel economy is slightly lower than the Prius C, non-hybrid cars like the Ford Fiesta SFE, Honda Civic Hatchback and Chevy Spark also cost a lot less, offer better performance and more features.

8A / 12A switchable Level 1 charging cable CHAdeMO DC quick charge port Battery warming system MiEV remote system (pre-activated air conditioning, heater and timer battery charging) Approaching Vehicle Audio System (AVAS) for alerting pedestrians Charging Times: 3 22 hours for 8amp 14 hours for 12 amp 7 hours with 240V / 15A Level 2 charging system Less than 30 minutes to 80 % full with CHAdeMO Level 3 DC Quick Charger Driving Modes: «D» — allows maximum performance as it generates 100 % torque in direct response to accelerator input «ECO» — helps maximize energy usage («fuel economy») by slightly reducing overall power output to reduce the rate of battery consumption «B» — increases regenerative brake biasing to augment energy recycling (with 100 % of power production available)

Fuel consumption is decent to if not exactly class - leading, with the manual transmission offering an average of 31 mpg and the automatic slightly less at 30 mpg.

The 2012 M - Class has slightly bigger exterior dimensions and a sleeker design, upgraded interior and tech features, standard all - wheel drive, a new 7 - speed automatic transmission, and V6 and V8 engines that are more powerful yet drink less fuel.

The two four - cylinder engine options have also been adjusted to increase fuel efficiency, but they now come with slightly less horsepower.

Fuel economy with both the manual and automatic transmissions is similar to the Nissan Versa and slightly poorer than that of the Honda Fit, which has significantly less horsepower.

Of course, while the CR - Z is the world's first hybrid to be available with a manual transmission, CVT automatic - equipped models produce slightly less torque but are more fuel - efficient.

Granted, following an upgrade to meet Euro 6 emissions standards — which also brings a quoted «three to four per cent» improvement in fuel economy — it makes slightly less power and torque -LRB--3 kW / -4 Nm).

Power and efficiency The extra mass and taller, slightly less aerodynamic profile adds a few ticks to the 0 - 60 time and subtracts a few from the fuel economy estimates, but we'll come back to that momentarily.

Meanwhile, the 2.0 XT models yield slightly less attractive fuel economy numbers: 23 mpg in the city, 28 mpg on the highway, and 25 mpg combined.

Honda expects fuel economy to equal 40 miles per gallon in the city and 43 mpg on the highway — slightly less than the Civic Hybrid but the Insight should cost considerably less.

Fuel economy in the SE was slightly less than the EPA figures of 17 miles per gallon city and 26 mpg highway but not enough to make a major difference.

Subpar fuel economy ratings in the top trim model; slightly less cargo space than primary rivals.

Nowhere in the Common Principles do we even see an alternatives test to measure whether support for non-greenhouse gas emitting renewable energy could be pursued instead of a slightly less dirty fossil fuel project.

Diesel and other engines can now get efficiencies nearly as good as fuel cells at far less cost, and the slightly lower efficiency is more than compensated for by useful heat recovery.